| rockthecosmos2008 31.12.2007 05:17 |
Hi, Can anyone tell me how i can find out where sint is in the charts? Has it even charted yet? NO PISS TAKERS! IF THIS BORES YOU, THEN WHY CLICK, AND READ IT? THANK YOU |
| rockthecosmos2008 31.12.2007 05:18 |
HELLO |
| Freddie May 31.12.2007 06:16 |
Hello... |
| studyan 31.12.2007 06:40 |
only released today 31st dec it will chart next sunday hopefully |
| radio_what's_new 31.12.2007 07:46 |
tilltheendoftime wrote: Hi, Can anyone tell me how i can find out where sint is in the charts? Has it even charted yet? NO PISS TAKERS! IF THIS BORES YOU, THEN WHY CLICK, AND READ IT? THANK YOUsaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay it ain't trueeeeeeeeeeee.....saaaaaay it for real.....when I open my eyes will it be number one? Dude wake up, the song will NOT chart anywhere in the world. |
| Roger's Beard 31.12.2007 08:02 |
It'll NEVER be in the charts as you can't bloody buy it in the record shops (at least none in Sheffield, UK) |
| monty-- 31.12.2007 09:05 |
Well, it's available for free, via Brian May.com or Youtube. So I think that'll effect sales. Not as if they need the money. |
| RMT 31.12.2007 09:24 |
You can't get it anywhere in the Merry Hill Shopping Centre or in Wolverhampton. I'm guessing Brum is the same. I am really annoyed - how can we buy it if nowhere stocks it?!? |
| olly1988 31.12.2007 10:40 |
same here. nowhere sells singles and if they do its that tosser wh won x factor that cant actually fucking sing!!! |
| rockthecosmos2008 31.12.2007 10:53 |
i think HMV are selling it, check out their web site people UP THE BAGGIES!!! |
| Queengirl47 31.12.2007 11:00 |
Buy the single from Queenonline! Thats what I did... cuz it's not being released here in the states :( ...so, I ordered it from there! |
| _Bijou_ 31.12.2007 11:18 |
tilltheendoftime wrote: i think HMV are selling it, check out their web site people UP THE BAGGIES!!!HMV is where I got it. I looked in Virgin at the new releases and no sign. |
| mickyparise 31.12.2007 12:21 |
You can also buy it on amazon.com link |
| Haystacks Calhoun II 31.12.2007 12:33 |
Anyone heard the new mix yet? |
| Micrówave 31.12.2007 12:56 |
I think it'll knock Justin Timberlake, Nelly Furtado, and Beyonce right off the charts. Oh wait, it'll be 2008 soon. Never mind. |
| Roger's Beard 31.12.2007 13:45 |
Oh yeah, you can buy it online. What's annoying me is that it's the first Queen single for 10 years and I wanted to re-live the old days of going to a record shop and actually buying it on the day of release. Had I known it wasn't going to be available in any shops (Virgin, HMV, WHSmith, Woolworths, ASDA, Morrisons), I'd have ordered it online and I might actually have had it today! |
| brENsKi 31.12.2007 16:53 |
tiltheendoftime asked a question with a ridiculously simple answer: How do we know where SINT is in the charts? answer: easy - well outside the charts - or in other words it's so low in sales that it's in fact "Jules Vernesque" - 20,000 leagues under the charts |
| rockthecosmos2008 01.01.2008 07:50 |
HELLO I THOUGHT THAT QUEENZONE WAS FOR QUEEN FANS, SO WHY IS IT THAT WE KEEP GETTING ANTI QUEEN + PR PEOPLE SLAGGING OFF THE BAND, WHO ARE JUST TRYING SOMETHING NEW, TO KEEP THE QUEEN SOUND ALIVE? I THINK THE MOANERS SHOULD STOP SLAGGING OFF THE NEW STUFF, AND START SUPPORT BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL, OTHERWISE SHUT THE FUCK UP, AND GO AND BE A FAN OF THE STONE GODS OR SOMETHING. IT'S GREAT TO HEAR THAT QUEEN SOUND ON A NEW TRACK, I KNOW THAT SINT IS'NT WHAT WE ALL WANT, MYSELF I AM WAITING FOR CLASSIC BRIAN TUNE HEADLONG, HAMMER TO FALL ETC, I AM CONFIDENT THAT THE NEW ALBUM WILL BE GREAT AND PUT QUEEN BACK WHERE THEY BELONG. OH AND BY THE WAY, I ON'T GIVE A FUCK IF I'VE SPELT ANY WORDS WRONG, OR IF I'VE MISSED COMMAS, INNUENDO1991, KEEP THE QUESTIONS COMING, IGNORE THE TWATS THAT KEEP TAKING THE PISS, AT LEAST YOU ARE A REAL FAN, WHO WANTS TO TALK ABOUT REAL THINGS, AND NOT KEEP FUCKING MOANING ALL THE WHILE. HAPPY NEW YEAR PEOPLE!! |
| Tero 01.01.2008 08:20 |
tilltheendoftime wrote: HELLOHi, How you've been? tilltheendoftime wrote: I THOUGHT THAT QUEENZONE WAS FOR QUEEN FANS, SO WHY IS IT THAT WE KEEP GETTING ANTI QUEEN + PR PEOPLE SLAGGING OFF THE BAND, WHO ARE JUST TRYING SOMETHING NEW, TO KEEP THE QUEEN SOUND ALIVE?In case you hadn't noticed it, Queen and Queen+Paul Rodgers are two separate bands. One of them had a legendary 20 year career with groundbreaking music (as well as some pretty average albums), while the other one has only managed to squeeze out that SINT song so far... And to be honest, it it can't really sound like Queen, can it? For starters it has a singer who was never featured on any Queen album. tilltheendoftime wrote: I THINK THE MOANERS SHOULD STOP SLAGGING OFF THE NEW STUFF, AND START SUPPORT BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL, OTHERWISE SHUT THE FUCK UP, AND GO AND BE A FAN OF THE STONE GODS OR SOMETHING.Again, Queen and Queen+Paul Rodgers are two different bands. There are some similarities because there are same members, but so far Q+PR have proven themselves to be nothing more than a Queen tribute band with one VERY average single available for download. Nowhere on the previous albums (or anywhere else in the world for that matter, apart from the internet messages of some very deluded people like yourself) did it say that we have to support any band with similarities to Queen, and no one has said we shouldn't be able to judge them just like any other band. It is PERFECTLY reasonable to be a fan of Queen, but not a fan of Queen+Paul Rodgers. I repeat again, they are not the same band, and nowhere have we agreed to treat them as such. tilltheendoftime wrote: IT'S GREAT TO HEAR THAT QUEEN SOUND ON A NEW TRACK, I KNOW THAT SINT IS'NT WHAT WE ALL WANT, MYSELF I AM WAITING FOR CLASSIC BRIAN TUNE HEADLONG, HAMMER TO FALL ETC, I AM CONFIDENT THAT THE NEW ALBUM WILL BE GREAT AND PUT QUEEN BACK WHERE THEY BELONG.You can wait for as long as you want, but the new album is not going to put Queen "back to where they belong" because a) The new album is not being released by Queen. It's going to be released by Queen+Paul Rodgers, and b) because the new album simply will not sound (in general) as any Queen album because it has an entirely different singer with an entirely different style of singing, and an entirely different style of music he likes to write and perform. tilltheendoftime wrote: OH AND BY THE WAY, I ON'T GIVE A FUCK IF I'VE SPELT ANY WORDS WRONG, OR IF I'VE MISSED COMMAS, INNUENDO1991, KEEP THE QUESTIONS COMING, IGNORE THE TWATS THAT KEEP TAKING THE PISS, AT LEAST YOU ARE A REAL FAN, WHO WANTS TO TALK ABOUT REAL THINGS, AND NOT KEEP FUCKING MOANING ALL THE WHILE.I think a bigger issue this time is your constant use of capital letters, which makes the text harder to read, and makes the tone more aggressive. tilltheendoftime wrote: HAPPY NEW YEAR PEOPLE!!Happy New Year to you too! |
| castaway_girl 01.01.2008 21:17 |
Its not avaliable here in Australia either...not that that surprises me. you cant get their solo albums or anything down here. |
| BradJarre 02.01.2008 07:25 |
WHo the hell is tilltheendoftime? |
| Daveboy35 02.01.2008 09:49 |
Try tescos i got mine this morning!!!!! Fabulous to have a CD single by queen haven't had that feeling in 10years since NOBY. |
| brENsKi 03.01.2008 14:28 |
tilltheendoftime wrote:HELLO I THOUGHT THAT QUEENZONE WAS FOR QUEEN FANS, SO WHY IS IT THAT WE KEEP GETTING ANTI QUEEN + PR PEOPLE SLAGGING OFF THE BAND, WHO ARE JUST TRYING SOMETHING NEW, TO KEEP THE QUEEN SOUND ALIVE?i hope you are not aiming this at my comments. life is about opinions, and that was my opinion...i thinks it's a shit tune. if they do something that i like i will come out and say so...but i'm not holding my breath. as i have said before...all of Roger's solo stuff is better than anything i have yet to hear released under the Queen banner. tilltheendoftime wrote: I THINK THE MOANERS SHOULD STOP SLAGGING OFF THE NEW STUFF, AND START SUPPORT BRIAN, ROGER AND PAUL, OTHERWISE SHUT THE FUCK UP, AND GO AND BE A FAN OF THE STONE GODS OR SOMETHING.It's not "anti-queen" to say something is rubbish...would you buy a car, or tv or book that you thought was rubbish? no YOU would say what you tjhought of it, and avoid at all costs...same applies to Queen - fan or not, they are not entitled to our unconditional support...otherwise they could get away with just farting into microphones and charge us for the privilege. tilltheendoftime wrote: IT'S GREAT TO HEAR THAT QUEEN SOUND ON A NEW TRACK, I KNOW THAT SINT IS'NT WHAT WE ALL WANT, MYSELF I AM WAITING FOR CLASSIC BRIAN TUNE HEADLONG, HAMMER TO FALL ETC, I AM CONFIDENT THAT THE NEW ALBUM WILL BE GREAT AND PUT QUEEN BACK WHERE THEY BELONG.no it isn't...not if the "new (old) track" is shite!!! and as for your confidence...i will bet you £100 that the single doesn't make the UK top 20 singles charts and double the bet that the album doesn't go top ten UK charts...put your money where you confident mouth is... tilltheendoftime wrote: OH AND BY THE WAY, I ON'T GIVE A FUCK IF I'VE SPELT ANY WORDS WRONG, OR IF I'VE MISSED COMMAS, INNUENDO1991, KEEP THE QUESTIONS COMING, IGNORE THE TWATS THAT KEEP TAKING THE PISS, AT LEAST YOU ARE A REAL FAN, WHO WANTS TO TALK ABOUT REAL THINGS, AND NOT KEEP FUCKING MOANING ALL THE WHILE. HAPPY NEW YEAR PEOPLE!!you need to take off your "queen coloured spectacles" and see the reality...the band as a force are spent....the glory days were gone before you were born.... doesn't mean we can't still love the band...i find it the same with the who, beatles and floyd...but it doesn't mean you have to be a sychophantic stepford and love everything they do...where's your fucking objectivity? |
| PieterMC 03.01.2008 15:03 |
It's listed at #3 in HMV's chart on their website. |
| brENsKi 03.01.2008 15:09 |
PieterMC wrote: It's listed at #3 in HMV's chart on their website.no it isn't that isn't the chart - that's their opinion of "top ten singles worth buying" the actual singles chart is the link above...and it's not in the top 30 |
| PieterMC 03.01.2008 15:25 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote:ahh well... last time I believe what somebody tells me :-)PieterMC wrote: It's listed at #3 in HMV's chart on their website.no it isn't that isn't the chart - that's their opinion of "top ten singles worth buying" the actual singles chart is the link above...and it's not in the top 30 |
| Cwazy little thing 03.01.2008 15:28 |
Id like to see it chart, but I doubt it will. And I like Stone Gods, the one track available to hear anyway. |
| PieterMC 03.01.2008 16:46 |
Cwazy little thing wrote: And I like Stone Gods, the one track available to hear anyway.Just heard this today. Great track. I can't wait to hear the entire album. |
| Mr Mercury 04.01.2008 06:12 |
tilltheendoftime wrote: Hi, Can anyone tell me how i can find out where sint is in the charts? Has it even charted yet? NO PISS TAKERS! IF THIS BORES YOU, THEN WHY CLICK, AND READ IT? THANK YOUHeres a link to the UK charts. Keep in mind that at the time of posting this (4th Jan 2008), the song hasnt charted yet. link |
| brENsKi 04.01.2008 12:44 |
and keep in mind that if singles don't break the top 40 in their first week (these days) they usually don't at all...as it equates to a slow start with initial sales spread over 2 rather than 1 sales week...once the initial impetus is gone, it's hard to build up anymore... |
| Cwazy little thing 05.01.2008 08:05 |
PieterMC wrote:Yeah - Burn the Witch sounds good - They've got an EP out sometime in the next week or two I think - Ive got tickets to see them in Manchester in January.Cwazy little thing wrote: And I like Stone Gods, the one track available to hear anyway.Just heard this today. Great track. I can't wait to hear the entire album. Hope the rest of the album is as epic - Im short on big sounding rock/metal bands to follow at the moment. As for SINT - Ive just decided I will buy the physical release - it'll only annoy me at some point in the future if I dont. Look forwards to getting a cd quality version to put through a half decent system rather than my PC. |
| brENsKi 06.01.2008 16:04 |
well this week's top 40 are done...and surprise surprise, SINT didn't make it c'mon people - it's not rocket science...queen used to make singles that charted when they did stuff that was different/valid/interesting Joe Public couldn't give a toss about this one |
| Michael Allred 06.01.2008 18:21 |
Are we sure this chart includes this week, especially since this week isn't even over yet? Shouldn't we wait until tomorrow since that would actually mark a week since SINT was released? |
| brENsKi 06.01.2008 18:39 |
chart is on bbc website as per 7pm chart show tonight |
| kirkpatrickuk 07.01.2008 05:39 |
If this is correct then I dont think it even made the top 100. link |
| kirkpatrickuk 07.01.2008 05:43 |
It's 251 in the Amazon.co.uk sales ranking and number 3 in CD singles.....but who buys them nowadays (I do!!!). |
| Reading Princess 07.01.2008 08:35 |
In the Official Uk charts it's a new entry at No. 90 this week. Why? Because it's a load of toss. Very worthy lyrics but, let's face it, you don't go around humming words. You hum the tune and this one is bollocks. Interestingly at No. 81 this week is Don't Stop Me Now - about 28 years since it was released as a single. Now there's a tune (and a singer!) |
| Aquillas 07.01.2008 11:24 |
clear wrote: Interestingly at No. 81 this week is Don't Stop Me Now - about 28 years since it was released as a single. Now there's a tune (and a singer!)Incredible but true: Don't Stop Me Now at no. 81...:D |
| Micrówave 07.01.2008 11:32 |
Tero wrote: And to be honest, it it can't really sound like Queen, can it? For starters it has a singer who was never featured on any Queen album.Yeah, and RUSH should have changed their name in 1974. And AC/DC should be called ABS/DBS. (After Bon Scott... dead Bon Scott) Who can get all this done? Maybe Treasure Moment can ask Jim Beach at the next QPL Management meeting. |
| Tero 07.01.2008 12:55 |
Micrówave wrote:I'm actually pretty tired of THIS particular argument always being countered with "but so-and-so band changed their vocalist as well in 1583!". (It might be a valid point to make if Freddie was the second vocalist in the band, and had gotten onboard around 1974-75.)Tero wrote: And to be honest, it it can't really sound like Queen, can it? For starters it has a singer who was never featured on any Queen album.Yeah, and RUSH should have changed their name in 1974. And AC/DC should be called ABS/DBS. (After Bon Scott... dead Bon Scott) Who can get all this done? Maybe Treasure Moment can ask Jim Beach at the next QPL Management meeting. Can you instead name another band besides Queen which stayed in the same line-up for a legendary twenty year recording career, and THEN had a major line-up change with nobody kicking a fuss? Rush? AC/DC? Genesis? Pink Floyd? Van Halen? Iron Maiden? Rolling Stones? What do all these acts have in common which they don't have in common with Queen? The early changes in their recording lineup. I submit that the legendary Queen sound was a combination of the same four highly talented individual working together for twenty years, and developing together. Whereas "normal" bands have changed their style along with their members every few years, a Queen fan could always count on their favourite band to grow TOGETHER in new directions... It's not only a sound, but a way of life, and a whole different philosophy than what is expected in the rock world. To throw that away for a fleeting hope of regaining the past glories is shortsighted, and I would dare to say even detrimental to the Queen name in the long run. The longevity of the line up which was one of their best advantages in being remembered, has now turned into a mockery of the name. Great, at least they got the Queen name back in the charts, making waves at #90! |
| brENsKi 08.01.2008 13:02 |
shame i wasn't taken up on my bet...DSMN in at 81, queen's new single at 90? fekkin lamentable!!! and i tell you this...if ever my comments that current queen (smile) sound is completely invalid in the modern era - this chart position is it... Joe Public couldn't give a toss about this tired, dirge-like crap!!! there is no room for unmemorable rubbish these days... i've ranted about this elsewhere... |
| PieterMC 08.01.2008 13:06 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: shame i wasn't taken up on my bet...DSMN in at 81, queen's new single at 90? fekkin lamentable!!! and i tell you this...if ever my comments that current queen (smile) sound is completely invalid in the modern era - this chart position is it... Joe Public couldn't give a toss about this tired, dirge-like crap!!! there is no room for unmemorable rubbish these days... i've ranted about this elsewhere...Or perhaps people who already downloaded the song did not feel that they need to purchase a 1 track CD single. If Joe Public downloaded the song for free, what possible reason would they have for actually buying a copy? It's ironic that you say that there is no room for unmemorable rubbish these days when the charts are filled with unmemorable rubbish. |
| brENsKi 08.01.2008 13:10 |
PieterMC wrote:kids will buy rubbish by x-factor etc because they can hum it and it's simple and not too demanding. adults won't buy this crap...because it's nothing...let's face it...if a 30yr old single is at no 81 on the same week as a new release it tells you all you need to know...the new release is rubbish...after all most people will have DSMN on one of the many GH cds or Jazz by now..<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: shame i wasn't taken up on my bet...DSMN in at 81, queen's new single at 90? fekkin lamentable!!! and i tell you this...if ever my comments that current queen (smile) sound is completely invalid in the modern era - this chart position is it... Joe Public couldn't give a toss about this tired, dirge-like crap!!! there is no room for unmemorable rubbish these days... i've ranted about this elsewhere...Or perhaps people who already downloaded the song did not feel that they need to purchase a 1 track CD single. If Joe Public downloaded the song for free, what possible reason would they have for actually buying a copy? It's ironic that you say that there is no room for unmemorable rubbish these days when the charts are filled with unmemorable rubbish. |
| PieterMC 08.01.2008 13:14 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: .if a 30yr old single is at no 81 on the same week as a new release it tells you all you need to know...the new release is rubbish...I'm not defending the song one way or another, but to suggest that a song is rubbish just because of a poor chart placement seems kinda strange to me. |
| brENsKi 08.01.2008 14:20 |
PieterMC wrote:you need to read my other posts on this subject...it's rubbish because it's rubbish...the poor chart position just goes to underline my opinion...very seldom does a great single fail to chart<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: .if a 30yr old single is at no 81 on the same week as a new release it tells you all you need to know...the new release is rubbish...I'm not defending the song one way or another, but to suggest that a song is rubbish just because of a poor chart placement seems kinda strange to me. |
| Bobby_brown 08.01.2008 17:20 |
clear wrote: In the Official Uk charts it's a new entry at No. 90 this week. Why? Because it's a load of toss. Very worthy lyrics but, let's face it, you don't go around humming words. You hum the tune and this one is bollocks. Interestingly at No. 81 this week is Don't Stop Me Now - about 28 years since it was released as a single. Now there's a tune (and a singer!)How do they compile the Top´s these days? I´m from the old school, and i don´t underrstand quite well the new way to do it. Does this means that every music in ITunes or other digital store counts as a single? Take care |
| Brian_Mays_Wig 10.01.2008 02:26 |
pootle1 wrote: It'll NEVER be in the charts as you can't bloody buy it in the record shops (at least none in Sheffield, UK)I got it in HMV last week. |
| wilk 11.01.2008 15:55 |
Seems like they fumbled the release to me. Available free to promote a charity followed by a paid release. I hope they promote the new album better than this. |
| brENsKi 11.01.2008 17:18 |
wilk wrote: Seems like they fumbled the release to me. Available free to promote a charity followed by a paid release. I hope they promote the new album better than this.they'll probably give the new album away with packets of cornflakes... although if they wanna give it some kudos...they could package it with a 30th anniversary double pack of Jazz... |
| Raf 13.01.2008 12:45 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote:So that it'll be a lot more expensive and people in general will refuse to pay so much to get a repeated disc?wilk wrote: Seems like they fumbled the release to me. Available free to promote a charity followed by a paid release. I hope they promote the new album better than this.they'll probably give the new album away with packets of cornflakes... although if they wanna give it some kudos...they could package it with a 30th anniversary double pack of Jazz... Sounds intelligent. |
| JeroenG 19.01.2008 13:32 |
I was in the 'Free Record Shop' today (The Netherlands) and "Say It's Not True" was in the shelves at chartnr. 20..... Normally I would think that means it's on nr. 20 of the charts, right? On the other hand, I doubt if it's really true. |
| Pim Derks 19.01.2008 13:55 |
link It's not in there. |
| Walter B. 19.01.2008 14:00 |
It's at no. 62: link more info: link |
| Pim Derks 19.01.2008 14:06 |
That must mean that they've sold about 9 or 10 copies, right? |
| Walter B. 24.01.2008 12:34 |
In the "official" Dutch Top 40 the single enters at no. 36 this week: link |
| Walter B. 25.01.2008 14:01 |
Walter B. wrote: It's at no. 62: link more info: linkIn its second week it is at no. 83. link |
| Voice of Reason 2018 01.02.2008 05:50 |
Hey - last night I finally saw SINT in my local Zavvi (formerly Virgin)! I didn't get it. €4 for a song I've already had downloaded and video I could only watch on a computer(I don't have one at home). |