| theCro 15.12.2007 11:01 |
tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? |
| pittrek 15.12.2007 12:00 |
Ehm - because it does NOT exist ? |
| Smitty 15.12.2007 12:04 |
The gig definitely existed...in 1986. Come on, can we let this one go? The most we will get is audio from the concert, most likely as a crappy "top 100 bootlegs" release. The reason we won't get video has already been touched on in this thread. |
| onevsion 15.12.2007 15:26 |
<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: The gig definitely existed...in 1986. Come on, can we let this one go? The most we will get is audio from the concert, most likely as a crappy "top 100 bootlegs" release. The reason we won't get video has already been touched on in this thread.I agree. Also, I'm quite happy with the bootleg video filmed from the screen with the EX audience recording copy from the masters synched to it. No need for an official release IMHO. A 70's release is what most fans want I think. Hammy '79 would be great. |
| john bodega 16.12.2007 02:32 |
theCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist?Haha haha hahahahahha. Hahahaha. |
| theCro 16.12.2007 11:56 |
Zebonka12 wrote:what's so funny? go and suck your daddy's nipplestheCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist?Haha haha hahahahahha. Hahahaha. rofl |
| Penetration_Guru 16.12.2007 14:52 |
Hypothetically, if the entire multi-angle footage hadn't disappeared off SOMEONE's hard drive, we COULD have had it released.... |
| john bodega 17.12.2007 00:32 |
theCro wrote:What's so funny?Zebonka12 wrote:what's so funny? go and suck your daddy's nipples rofltheCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist?Haha haha hahahahahha. Hahahaha. BRIAN MAY: It wasn't recorded GREG BROOKS: It wasn't recorded THE CRO: So why hasn't it been released? |
| Benn 17.12.2007 12:27 |
Why? Because TheCro is a buffoon and continually bombards this board with ridiculously inane questions. Just waiting for his next one: "Why is Brian sometimes called Brian May and sometimes just Brian?" |
| pittrek 17.12.2007 13:08 |
Just a few threads which were started by theCro in the last days : link link link link link link |
| Aquillas 17.12.2007 14:08 |
The fourth link is the best. :P |
| theCro 17.12.2007 18:18 |
Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :Presponses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... |
| Winter Land Man 17.12.2007 18:52 |
theCro wrote:I wasn't joking on that thread.Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :Presponses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... |
| theCro 17.12.2007 23:28 |
.*.Messenger: Jake Pyndle.*. wrote:ok sorry then, it wasnt meant to youtheCro wrote:I wasn't joking on that thread.Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :Presponses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... |
| Roger's Beard 18.12.2007 04:35 |
"Hypothetically - why Queen will not release 'Live at Knebworth' Hmmm.If you mean "video" then maybe because they just don't have it? Despite what Greg says, it's unlikely that the feed from the big screen was NOT recorded. However, it is very probable that the feed would have been recorded either straight to VHS (which will be languishing forgotton in Brian's loft) or on either lo-band or hi-band U matic videocassette: either way, these formats will NOT be of sufficient quality to ever merit a practical commercial release. It IS more likely that we will get a CD release of the concert at some point, or even a 5.1 surround mix on an "extras" disc. Budapest on disc one, Knebworth DVDA surround mix on disc two with what little broadcast quality footage survives. |
| Raf 18.12.2007 07:37 |
Benn wrote: Why? Because TheCro is a buffoon and continually bombards this board with ridiculously inane questions. Just waiting for his next one: "Why is Brian sometimes called Brian May and sometimes just Brian?"Not to mention when he decides to upload some mp3 files and insists on writing a disclaimer like "I don't have it in FLAC and fuck off if you like FLAC" |
| Penetration_Guru 18.12.2007 16:31 |
theCro wrote:We should have a race to find theCro's "I lost all my best mp3s, please resupply" thread, to prove what a wally he is....Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :Presponses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... mate, you ARE a fucking idiot, however much to would like to believe the contrary. |
| brENsKi 18.12.2007 17:21 |
theCro uttered verbal diarrhoea: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ because you are talking shit? |
| thunderbolt 31742 19.12.2007 17:03 |
theCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes?Because Roger had a particularly bad acid trip the night after the concert and ate the tapes. There, happy? |
| theCro 19.12.2007 20:16 |
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: theCro uttered verbal diarrhoea: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ because you are talking shit?oh poor retard you go and suck your daddy's nipples ROFL get a life, jerk |
| theCro 19.12.2007 20:17 |
pootle1 wrote: "Hypothetically - why Queen will not release 'Live at Knebworth' Hmmm.If you mean "video" then maybe because they just don't have it? Despite what Greg says, it's unlikely that the feed from the big screen was NOT recorded. However, it is very probable that the feed would have been recorded either straight to VHS (which will be languishing forgotton in Brian's loft) or on either lo-band or hi-band U matic videocassette: either way, these formats will NOT be of sufficient quality to ever merit a practical commercial release. It IS more likely that we will get a CD release of the concert at some point, or even a 5.1 surround mix on an "extras" disc. Budapest on disc one, Knebworth DVDA surround mix on disc two with what little broadcast quality footage survives.thank you! |
| alexnvl 22.12.2007 17:30 |
Parts of the concert were recorded actually. You can see it here: link |
| deleted user 22.12.2007 23:36 |
thecro said: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? Because Brian May AKA Hypothetiacally Brain saw he might hypohetically have a spot on his hand he plays with so thought it might be best to burn the tape and save him having to hypothetically be embarresed for not hypothetically looking his best. Therefore they do not hypothetically exist anymore. You got your hypotheical answer! |