QueenZone discussion #1061879

<font color=#FF66FF><b>Marial-B wrote: Robbie admires Freddie, but he's not a Freddie-wannabe, so prepare to be killed

<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I think he sounds excellent, and I love the track. But he sounds nothing like Freddie... ...FORTUNATELY. He is not Freddie, he sounds nothing like Freddie, and that is the good thing about this collaboration. We don't need more shitty lameass Freddie wannabes like George Michael and Robbie Williams.

<font color=#FF66FF><b>Marial-B wrote: Robbie admires Freddie, but he's not a Freddie-wannabe, so prepare to be killed *reloads the bazooka*

olly1988 wrote: I wouldnt say he sounded like freddie, BUT his vocal performance on the track was to the same standard/ level Freddie's were. and he is 57!!! I dont think freddie would have sang 'say-ey-yay' as much. Lol.

rocktheflash wrote: bullshit!!!!

<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I think he sounds excellent, and I love the track. But he sounds nothing like Freddie... ...FORTUNATELY.

olly1988 wrote: I wouldnt say he sounded like freddie, BUT his vocal performance on the track was to the same standard/ level Freddie's were. and he is 57!!! I dont think freddie would have sang 'say-ey-yay' as much. Lol.

Ma_Luisa_loves_Mr._Bad_Guy wrote: You are totally crazy....No one in this world could sound like Freddie. Freddie Mercury is the best singer in this planet, Paul is just a good singer

una999 wrote: Say it's not True - I think people have to admit that Paul is a fantastic singer. - EVEN SOUNDS LIKE FREDDIE!!! I'm being serious.

Dan Corson XI: Full Moon Fever wrote:

<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I think he sounds excellent, and I love the track. But he sounds nothing like Freddie... ...FORTUNATELY.

Three gold stars! Though I disagree that George Michael is a 'lameass Freddie wannabe'.

queenfanbg wrote: and btw the difference between Frediie and Paul is simple:While Paul is a second range singer,Freddie was WORLD CLASS in everything

<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote:

Dan Corson XI: Full Moon Fever wrote:

<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I think he sounds excellent, and I love the track. But he sounds nothing like Freddie... ...FORTUNATELY.

Three gold stars! Though I disagree that George Michael is a 'lameass Freddie wannabe'.

That's right, in his solo career. But I think I would've liked his version of Somebody To Love better if he hadn't pulled a Freddie Mercury back then. The fact that he also offered himself to replace Freddie back in 92/93 also pisses me off big time.
WTF?..Do you realise how big of a fanbase GM has? He has a octave range which is par none to Freddie's...Listen to GM's music from the 90's like "Jesus To A Child" or "Freedom 90"..Before GM preformed at the FM Tribute Concert,he had practiced with the Queen members for a week..He didn't want to let Freddie down..Freddie & GM were really good friends..read the back story before your criticize.. btw GM was actually asked by the Queen members to join and turned them down

Neinbull wrote: I have nothing against them touring and having fun with their fans, but I wish they could stop being in the spotlight like Deacon and just enjoy what i've done, and not spoil it with "Queen".

AmeriQueen wrote: I had all these different ideas of who could potentially be a Queen vocalist after Freddie and to hell with all of it. Paul Rodgers is the one and only singer for that band unless aliens come to Earth and ressurect Mercury from the ashes.

<font color="9933FF"><b> Ms. Rebel wrote: GEORGE MICHAEL IS NOT FREDDIE MERCURY WANNABE.

<Font color=Puce>Deaky's<h6>Microwave? wrote:

<font color="9933FF"><b> Ms. Rebel wrote: GEORGE MICHAEL IS NOT FREDDIE MERCURY WANNABE.

Actually: GEORGE MICHAEL WAS ONCE SEXY BUT NOW HE'S NOT.

<font color="9933FF"><b> Ms. Rebel wrote:

<Font color=Puce>Deaky's<h6>Microwave? wrote:

<font color="9933FF"><b> Ms. Rebel wrote: GEORGE MICHAEL IS NOT FREDDIE MERCURY WANNABE.

Actually: GEORGE MICHAEL WAS ONCE SEXY BUT NOW HE'S NOT.

Oh yeeeeeeeeessss.....holyyyyyyyyy 80's and begining of 90's Mmmmmmmmm.....delicious... :9 But he still looks good for his age though :) Are you his fan? ;P

<font color="#FF00FF">its_a_hard_life wrote:

<font color="9933FF"><b> Ms. Rebel wrote:

<Font color=Puce>Deaky's<h6>Microwave? wrote:

<font color="9933FF"><b> Ms. Rebel wrote: GEORGE MICHAEL IS NOT FREDDIE MERCURY WANNABE.

Actually: GEORGE MICHAEL WAS ONCE SEXY BUT NOW HE'S NOT.

Oh yeeeeeeeeessss.....holyyyyyyyyy 80's and begining of 90's Mmmmmmmmm.....delicious... :9 But he still looks good for his age though :) Are you his fan? ;P

I am. :D HE WAS HOT IN THE WHAM! DAYS, WASN'T HE? :D

una999 wrote: Say it's not True - I think people have to admit that Paul is a fantastic singer. I mean listen to Roger and Brian and when he comes in it's class - EVEN SOUNDS LIKE FREDDIE!!! I'm being serious.

<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: I think he sounds excellent, and I love the track. But he sounds nothing like Freddie... ...FORTUNATELY. He is not Freddie, he sounds nothing like Freddie, and that is the good thing about this collaboration. We don't need more shitty lameass Freddie wannabes like George Michael and Robbie Williams.

argie1971 wrote: I'm just glad they got a good and established singer. Just look at Paul's resume. No, I don't think Paul sounds like Freddie at all. But hey, they could be like Journey, searching the web for vocalists from tribute bands to bring on the road.

<font color="black">Rogers Queen? wrote:

argie1971 wrote: I'm just glad they got a good and established singer. Just look at Paul's resume. No, I don't think Paul sounds like Freddie at all. But hey, they could be like Journey, searching the web for vocalists from tribute bands to bring on the road.

yeah...agreed because there are a lot of Queen Tribute bands that could do a better job as a singer, in my opinion and I'm thrilled to hear that Journey found someone becuase he has a lot of talent, and the same type of style as Steve.