josedequeso 27.11.2007 16:00 |
Would there be enough people interested in having a vine started? I would be more than happy to get a vine going if enough people want it. |
deleted user 27.11.2007 17:03 |
Yes!! That's a great idea! I'd like to be in this vine =) |
dobo 27.11.2007 17:06 |
I would be intrested |
g_pretender 28.11.2007 09:39 |
Sure, I would be interested. What are you considering to share on a vine? |
pittrek 28.11.2007 09:39 |
Well I would be interested :-) |
josedequeso 28.11.2007 15:50 |
Well, this vine would be just video, but later I would start an audio vine. For now I was thinking these dvds: Hammersmith Odean 12-24-75 Hyde Park 9-18-76 Earls' Court 6-06-77 (snivvle remastered edition) Houston 12-11-77 Tokyo 4-25-79 Hammersmith Odean 12-26-79 Buenos Aires 3-01-81 Sao Paulo 3-20-81 Japanese Jewels Documentary |
dobo 28.11.2007 16:42 |
They sound like a good place to start |
Queenrockyou 28.11.2007 16:48 |
Hummm... well, for a vine is somewhere where grape grows.... And my dictionnary isn't of any help !!! It seems that you are not willing to share some good old Bordeaux here, so I don't really know what you mean by "vine"... could you please explain me ? Always happy to learn new things... Regards, Olivier France. |
Queenrockyou 28.11.2007 16:48 |
Hummm... well, for a vine is somewhere where grape grows.... And my dictionnary isn't of any help !!! It seems that you are not willing to share some good old Bordeaux here, so I don't really know what you mean by "vine"... could you please explain me ? Always happy to learn new things... Regards, Olivier France. |
pittrek 29.11.2007 02:11 |
ruth.olivier wrote: Hummm... well, for a vine is somewhere where grape grows.... And my dictionnary isn't of any help !!! It seems that you are not willing to share some good old Bordeaux here, so I don't really know what you mean by "vine"... could you please explain me ? Always happy to learn new things... Regards, Olivier France.If I remember correctly, thus "vine" thing means, that you make a "chain" of people, from which the first one makes copies of his discs and sends them to the second person, the second person burns copies from those discs and sends them to the third person, etc. ... |
Queenrockyou 29.11.2007 03:28 |
OK I understand now what you mean !!! Unfortunately I don't have any DVD, only two or three odd things that were available here on Queenzone in the last months. So I can't offer anything great to this chain... Nice idea anyway !! Regards, Olivier, France. |
g_pretender 29.11.2007 06:54 |
pittrek wrote:Precisely, it's a chain of people moving a package of discs thru mail.ruth.olivier wrote: Hummm... well, for a vine is somewhere where grape grows.... And my dictionnary isn't of any help !!! It seems that you are not willing to share some good old Bordeaux here, so I don't really know what you mean by "vine"... could you please explain me ? Always happy to learn new things... Regards, Olivier France.If I remember correctly, thus "vine" thing means, that you make a "chain" of people, from which the first one makes copies of his discs and sends them to the second person, the second person burns copies from those discs and sends them to the third person, etc. ... Josedequeso: Nice list of shows. I already have some of these, but wouldn't ming getting some of the others. I eould also advise you not to put so many discs in a single vine or it will take forever for it to be forwarded along. A section for vines was created a year ago in the Queentraders forum. I think it would work better there than here. You can send someone a PM for the address without guiving away your e-mail address if you don't want to among other things. This is only a sugestion though, feel free to proceed in the way you see better. For those of you who don't know how a vine works here are the basics: You sign up for a vine in a forum (best way to keep track of the package) by adding your name to the vine list started by the original vine "seeder"(just copy and paste the list to a new post and add your name) If you are next in line contact the person with the package and provide your mailing address. When you recieve the package, register the date on the vine list. Copy the discs for yourself, and forward the ORIGINAL discs to the next person. This is important to preserve quality and reduce the chances for spreading copies with digital errors. When you forward the package, you register the sent date on the vine thread. A vine can last forever, so keep checking the thread for any new entries. Anyone can add stuff to the package contents, provided they update the vine contents on the original thread (if you have a superior version to a recording than the one included in the package for instance) Basicly that is it, you just need some patience, a CD or DVD burner and a basic internet connection. This is used by other bands fan comunities to share recordings, glad someone sugested it here as well. |
The Real Wizard 29.11.2007 12:39 |
This is a great idea. Before anything is sent, though, I think there should be extensive discussion and comparisons of versions, to ensure the best version is the one that spreads. |
josedequeso 29.11.2007 13:39 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: This is a great idea. Before anything is sent, though, I think there should be extensive discussion and comparisons of versions, to ensure the best version is the one that spreads.Bob, do you mind going through my website and see if these are in fact the best versions available. link Thanks I know I don't have the best version of Hammersmith 12-26-79 and Caracas 9-27-81. And I think this should be just pro-shot footage. But I don't have any pro shot footage after 1981, so anyone who has any is more than welcome to contribute. |
Queenrockyou 30.11.2007 12:51 |
Well, personnally, I wouldn't mind taking part of a vine for audio too, do you think it would be complicated to do ? Regards, Olivier, France. |
Saint Jiub 30.11.2007 14:52 |
ruth.olivier wrote: Well, personnally, I wouldn't mind taking part of a vine for audio too, do you think it would be complicated to do ? Regards, Olivier, France.Yes - it might get complicated. It would be easier to do it on Rapidshare and change the password every once in a while to keep out the mp3 riff-raff. I ran a bootleg vine a few years ago, and it took a lot of time to manage it. These are the disadvantages of a vine that I have experienced: 1 - Overseas shipping sometimes takes 3 weeks or more. 2 - Shipments within the same continent (but between different counties) takes longer than a week. 3 - Shipments sometimes get lost / stolen in the mail. 4 - Shipments sometimes get damaged in the mail. 5 - A few people will accept the package, but not continue the vine (and not answer e-mails). 6 - Some people need to be reminded to burn and mail the package within one week's time to keep the vine moving. |
The Real Wizard 01.12.2007 00:13 |
josedequeso wrote: Bob, do you mind going through my website and see if these are in fact the best versions available. link ThanksIt's hard to say if you've got the best versions of some, since you haven't posted the screenshots. But I can be pretty sure that your copies of Hammersmith 75, Earls Court 77, and Houston 77 are the best out there at the moment. London 79... complete? Methinks you copied the setlist from the CDs, as there isn't a complete video out there that I know of. |
g_pretender 01.12.2007 10:45 |
I thought that also. I think I have the same one he does. Mine also has the alternate edit on GDML and is only one disc. I don't know of any two disc version circulating, but my knowledge is limited. |
g_pretender 01.12.2007 10:52 |
Gym Bitch wrote: It would be easier to do it on Rapidshare and change the password every once in a while to keep out the mp3 riff-raff.What do you mean by this? Gym Bitch wrote: 1 - Overseas shipping sometimes takes 3 weeks or more. 2 - Shipments within the same continent (but between different counties) takes longer than a week. 3 - Shipments sometimes get lost / stolen in the mail. 4 - Shipments sometimes get damaged in the mail. 5 - A few people will accept the package, but not continue the vine (and not answer e-mails). 6 - Some people need to be reminded to burn and mail the package within one week's time to keep the vine moving.That's all good and true, but how do you yhink stuff got passed along in the old days, before the internet and broadband connections? By the way I have shipped stuff overseas and it doesn´t take three weeks. I don't know If you're aware of a prety good invention called the airplane. Is it too much to ask that people actualy put a little effort in getting this stuff, instead of just point and click? As for people no recieving packages and no sending them along, I believe that as long as some people that know the comunity are involved we can deny known bad shares entrance in the vine. And of course if you do it once, forguet about entering a second vine. |
josedequeso 01.12.2007 11:33 |
double post |
josedequeso 01.12.2007 11:35 |
OK, here are some screenshots:
link
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: London 79... complete? Methinks you copied the setlist from the CDs, as there isn't a complete video out there that I know of.Methinks you’re correct ;) That’s one large typo! I’ve corrected it now :) If only it was complete... |
pittrek 01.12.2007 13:22 |
Buenos Aires looks great. There is one version with a better picture, but cropped to 16:9 from Snow Producciones. Hyde Park - I don't remember my copy being so dark, but I can be wrong. Hammersmith Odeon 1975 - if it is from the "Christmas Eve at Hammersmith"" bootleg, it's the best "commonly available" version, but not the best existing. Hammersmith Odeon 1979 - it looks like the best version. DQA version is more complete, but looks worse. Munich 79 - is it YV's version ? Because it looks great. Sao Paolo 81 - looks better then my version. Tokyo 79 - looks better then my version |
josedequeso 01.12.2007 15:30 |
pittrek wrote: Buenos Aires looks great. There is one version with a better picture, but cropped to 16:9 from Snow Producciones.I say to hell with Snow Producciones! :P In my opinion this is the best version of this video. pittrek wrote: Hyde Park - I don't remember my copy being so dark, but I can be wrong.I’m not sure about this version, I got my copy from The Traders Den, the screenshots are from the night portion of the show, maybe that’s why it’s so dark. pittrek wrote: Hammersmith Odeon 1975 - if it is from the "Christmas Eve at Hammersmith"" bootleg, it's the best "commonly available" version, but not the best existing.Yep, “Christmas Eve at Hammersmith” is my version, I got mine through a trade. I know it was shared here but apparently that version is corrupt based on the comments I’ve read in that thread. But what do you mean by "best existing"? Is the better version circulating or just known to exist? pittrek wrote: Hammersmith Odeon 1979 - it looks like the best version. DQA version is more complete, but looks worse.I don’t know about this video. I hope there’s an upgrade out there. I got this one again through a trade, the DQA version is listed on Bob’s site as being the best available. I’ve never seen the DQA version, so I can’t comment on that. pittrek wrote: Munich 79 - is it YV's version ? Because it looks great.Yep, the version shared here about a week ago. pittrek wrote: Sao Paolo 81 - looks better then my version.Another one I got through a trade. I think it comes from a TV broadcast because of the voice-overs. The major flaw to me is that the video is kind of “grainy.” I’m not sure if a clearer and more pristine version is out there. Of course, the original broadcast could be the cause of the graininess. pittrek wrote: Tokyo 79 - looks better then my versionI dunno, I guess mine’s the best version, it’s NTSC, just under 1 GB. That’s good for only 24 minutes of footage. I have London 11-19/20-74 and the QTV versions of Paris 3-01-79 and Caracas 9-27-81 coming in, so I’ll post some screens when I get those as well. The Caracas version I have now is the one that Marknow shared here, which is lossy. I don’t think the Rainbow 74 video can be included in this vine since it’s official. Touched on earlier in this thread, it would take a while to send between continents, so my idea is to have a North American leg and a European leg. So, to sum up, anyone with better quality video is more than welcome to contribute. And as I said before, I’d like to include some post-81 footage, but I have no pro-shot from that period. Any help? |
YourValentine 01.12.2007 17:21 |
There are not many post 81 pro shot concert videos as you know - just Japan 82 and 85 and Rio 85. The 2 Japan concerts cannot be shared on QZ because they are official, Rio is available but I have yet to see a nice copy, mainly the sound is usually not so great. Your Hammersmith 79 screen shots look nice, it's hard to compare versions from just a screen shot when the difference is not so big. I share the Digital Queen Archive version in the hub and I can torrent it if anyone is interested. Sao Paolo - could you give us some more info, for example file size? I posted some info about South America DVDs here link somehow the thread died but perhaps you can compare your Sao Paolo DVD with what I posted there. You are right about the European and American leg, that is very useful. We had a DVD tree on queen traders.com which ran criss cross across the continents with only very few people involved. You can look up the old QZ bootleg tree thread which was very good but required a lot of work and patience to keep it running over 6 months. link Also, I think you get more feedback in the Sharing forum. Would you accept leaves (i.e people who have no DVD burner and just receive DVDs at the end of the sending process)? |
dobo 01.12.2007 20:31 |
They all seem to be better than my versions so I am looking forward to this |
The Real Wizard 02.12.2007 00:54 |
josedequeso wrote:No way... that's definitely lossy. 24 minutes should be about 2Gb if it's lossless. I've got the same copy. On my widescreen TV, the picture looks very digitized and grainy. Ideally, we'll need a lossless copy of this and The Champions documentary, because there are a few clips from this show on there as well: Now I'm Here, band intro, BoRhap, Sheer Heart Attack, WWRY (different angles), and God Save The Queen.pittrek wrote: Tokyo 79 - looks better then my versionI dunno, I guess mine’s the best version, it’s NTSC, just under 1 GB. That’s good for only 24 minutes of footage. pittrek wrote: Hammersmith Odeon 1979 - it looks like the best version. DQA version is more complete, but looks worse.Indeed. Looks like this one needs a compilation too. Sao Paolo 81 - looks better then my version.I've got a nice compilation of this one from two or three sources. It'd be great if someone could synch the better audio to it! Looks like we need a few compilations... Buenos Aires 3-1-81 too, as we've discussed, with the better audio. Good times are ahead. |
pittrek 02.12.2007 06:35 |
josedequeso wrote:Well said :-) The guy definitely knows how to restore video, but for some unknown reason he usually starts from a DivX/VCD source and/or uses a crappy mpeg2 encoder, and he usually crops and resizes the video to 16:9.pittrek wrote: Buenos Aires looks great. There is one version with a better picture, but cropped to 16:9 from Snow Producciones.I say to hell with Snow Producciones! :P In my opinion this is the best version of this video. Yes, if it's the tradersden version, it's the best version around. I have created a compilation of this version (cropped to 16:9) and the parts from the ANATO anniversary DVD, but I'm not 100% satisfied with it, it needs more work.pittrek wrote: Hyde Park - I don't remember my copy being so dark, but I can be wrong.I’m not sure about this version, I got my copy from The Traders Den, the screenshots are from the night portion of the show, maybe that’s why it’s so dark. I have created a compilation, with using this video, filling the gaps from a OGWT SVCD bootleg provided by SirGH, and using the full OGWT intro (the famous "star kicker") from a Rolling Stones bootleg. During SSOR you will see information about the concert, during SWAFIB you will see a photo slideshow taken from the original Killer Queen video, and during GSTQ the original closing credits of the OGWT broadcast. This complete video is synchronised with a compilation of best audio sources, for the first time 100% complete, including for the first time ALL Christmas references, and FULL audience "gaps", of course lossless. I thought it's finished, but when I watched it yesterday I noticed some audio delay on Ogre Battle and KYA (nothing major, just a few frames delay, but I want to do it as good as possible :-) ), and a big misstake - I wrote that Brian took inspiration for GSTQ from the british national "theme" :-( (BTW can anybody tell me how is it called correctly in english ? ) When I repair it, I could "maybe" add it as my input to the vine.pittrek wrote: Hammersmith Odeon 1975 - if it is from the "Christmas Eve at Hammersmith"" bootleg, it's the best "commonly available" version, but not the best existing.Yep, “Christmas Eve at Hammersmith” is my version, I got mine through a trade. I know it was shared here but apparently that version is corrupt based on the comments I’ve read in that thread. But what do you mean by "best existing"? Is the better version circulating or just known to exist? As Bob wrote, we need to make a compilation of these sources.pittrek wrote: Hammersmith Odeon 1979 - it looks like the best version. DQA version is more complete, but looks worse.I don’t know about this video. I hope there’s an upgrade out there. I got this one again through a trade, the DQA version is listed on Bob’s site as being the best available. I’ve never seen the DQA version, so I can’t comment on that. I started to download yesterday an NTSC version from tapecity, it's 0.99 GB, so maybe it's the same version ?pittrek wrote: Tokyo 79 - looks better then my versionI dunno, I guess mine’s the best version, it’s NTSC, just under 1 GB. That’s good for only 24 minutes of footage. I have London 11-19/20-74 and the QTV versions of Paris 3-01-79 and Caracas 9-27-81 coming in, so I’ll post some screens when I get those as well. The Caracas version I have now is the one that Marknow shared here, which is lossy. I don’t think the Rainbow 74 video can be included in this vine since it’s official.I am searching for a copy of Paris 1st March 79 which looks comparable to link |
josedequeso 02.12.2007 13:15 |
YourValentine wrote: Sao Paolo - could you give us some more info, for example file size?Coitanly! My version is 3.34 GB, it’s the same one you described in the link you provided. Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: No way... that's definitely lossy. 24 minutes should be about 2Gb if it's lossless. I've got the same copy. On my widescreen TV, the picture looks very digitized and grainy.Lossy, eh? OK, so is there a lossless version out there? Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Ideally, we'll need a lossless copy of this and The Champions documentary, because there are a few clips from this show on there as well: Now I'm Here, band intro, BoRhap, Sheer Heart Attack, WWRY (different angles), and God Save The Queen.I have a copy of The Champions coming in, I’ll post some screens when I get it. It might just be lossless. Who knows? Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: I've got a nice compilation of this one from two or three sources. It'd be great if someone could synch the better audio to it!Are you talking about synching it with the FM broadcast that was shared here? The broadcast sounds great. I was contemplating doing it, but I have almost no computer skills, perhaps someone else can do it. pittrek wrote: I am searching for a copy of Paris 1st March 79 which looks comparable to link I have only a version of Smitty's project, which looks much worse and Snow Producciones's version which I don't want to comment :-)That’s probably the version we’d want, I don’t know how my version will look. I’ve seen screenshots and it doesn’t look as good as the ones on the site. pittrek wrote: Hm, maybe add the 16 camera version of Budapest ? Or the full version of the Tribute concert ? Or Ro ck In Rio ?That would be nice :) So, we all agree on Munich 79, Earl’s Court 77 and Houston 77 as being the best versions out now (not counting 928's version of Houston 77). Hammersmith 75 and 79 need a compilation made and then synch it up to best lossless audio. Sao Paulo and Buenos Aires need lossless audio synched to it. And…what about Caracas 81? Also, any volunteers on making these compilations and synching up the audio? |
pittrek 02.12.2007 13:25 |
Hammersmith 75 is (almost) done. I have no problem to synching the rest if someone gives me the "assets" |
Saint Jiub 02.12.2007 23:29 |
g_pretender wrote:Gym Bitch wrote: It would be easier to do it on Rapidshare and change the password every once in a while to keep out the mp3 riff-raff.What do you mean by this? ELECTRONIC TRADING IS BOTH FASTER AND CHEAPER, AND THE FIRST DOWNLOADED FILES CAN BE CHECKED WITH A SPECTRAL ANALYZER BEFORE THE TRADE IS FULLY COMPLETED.Gym Bitch wrote: 1 - Overseas shipping sometimes takes 3 weeks or more. 2 - Shipments within the same continent (but between different counties) takes longer than a week. 3 - Shipments sometimes get lost / stolen in the mail. 4 - Shipments sometimes get damaged in the mail. 5 - A few people will accept the package, but not continue the vine (and not answer e-mails). 6 - Some people need to be reminded to burn and mail the package within one week's time to keep the vine moving.That's all good and true, but how do you yhink stuff got passed along in the old days, before the internet and broadband connections? By the way I have shipped stuff overseas and it doesn´t take three weeks. I don't know If you're aware of a prety good invention called the airplane. SORRY - IN MY BOOTLRG TREE FROM A FEW YEARS AGO THERE WERE SEVERAL TIMES THIS OCCURRED. Is it too much to ask that people actualy put a little effort in getting this stuff, instead of just point and click? HAVE YOU EVER HEARD THIS PHRASE?: "WORK SMARTER NOT HARDER" SHIPPING CD'S/DVD'S IS A WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY WHEN SENDING THESE ELECTRONICALLY IS FASTER, SAFER AND CHEAPER. |
josedequeso 02.12.2007 23:45 |
Mike Van: Queenzone's answer to a question no one asked.
Let the big-boy traders do our thing here, and you go sit at the kiddie's table. Do you have something positive to contribute to this discussion mike? If not, get lost. You have no business here.
Mike, you are the one that said that mp3s should be allowed, to accommodate those with a slow internet connection, how do you suppose they get these dvds if they are only available via the internet? And of course, you're not going to respond to my question, you'll just reply with something completely off topic and irrelevant.
pittrek wrote: Hammersmith 75 is (almost) done. I have no problem to synching the rest if someone gives me the "assets"Cool, I'm looking forward to it :) I'm not exactly sure what is the best audio available, I only have the "sanity clause" version. |
g_pretender 03.12.2007 03:58 |
josedequeso wrote: Mike Van: Queenzone's answer to a question no one asked. Let the big-boy traders do our thing here, and you go sit at the kiddie's table. Do you have something positive to contribute to this discussion mike? If not, get lost. You have no business here. Mike, you are the one that said that mp3s should be allowed, to accommodate those with a slow internet connection, how do you suppose they get these dvds if they are only available via the internet? And of course, you're not going to respond to my question, you'll just reply with something completely off topic and irrelevant.My thoughts exactly. If you want to get your point across try to keep a coherent speech. |
pittrek 03.12.2007 07:27 |
josedequeso wrote: Mike Van: Queenzone's answer to a question no one asked. Let the big-boy traders do our thing here, and you go sit at the kiddie's table. Do you have something positive to contribute to this discussion mike? If not, get lost. You have no business here. Mike, you are the one that said that mp3s should be allowed, to accommodate those with a slow internet connection, how do you suppose they get these dvds if they are only available via the internet? And of course, you're not going to respond to my question, you'll just reply with something completely off topic and irrelevant.There are many, MANY Queen fans which don't have internet access at home. I was also visiting this forum from an internet cafe for many years. This "vine" thing is for this kind of people. Well Bob has a previous version of my compilation (missing one "Merry Christmas"), so he can post a review, if he wants :-)pittrek wrote: Hammersmith 75 is (almost) done. I have no problem to synching the rest if someone gives me the "assets"Cool, I'm looking forward to it :) I'm not exactly sure what is the best audio available, I only have the "sanity clause" version. This audio compilation is basically the "sanity clause" version, with Ogre Battle and the Xmas medley from the "Westwood radio one" pre-FM CD (all sources speed-corrected to match the PAL TV broadcast). The intro and audience gaps are coming from a low-gen VHS shared here by somebody13, the other gaps are taken from Bob's SVCD (yes, unfortunately lossy, but it's only a few seconds so I think it's OK). BTW if somebody has at least a lossless audio of the TV broadcast, it would help me creating the definitive version of this DVD :-) |
Saint Jiub 03.12.2007 20:55 |
josedequeso wrote: Mike, you are the one that said that mp3s should be allowed, to accommodate those with a slow internet connection, how do you suppose they get these dvds if they are only available via the internet? And of course, you're not going to respond to my question, you'll just reply with something completely off topic and irrelevant.Sorry, I forgot that some people might not have their own computer to download the concerts. However, I still suggest that you consider having some or most people download the concerts (if possible) to save your time (and your own sanity). If you create two vines (North America and Europe) and 25 people enroll in each vine, you could still be running these two vines one year from now. My bootleg tree a few years ago "only" lasted 6 months, but I was so relieved when all the work was finally completed. I commend you for starting the bootleg tree. |
josedequeso 03.12.2007 23:28 |
Gym Bitch wrote: However, I still suggest that you consider having some or most people download the concerts (if possible) to save your time (and your own sanity).Yes, I believe all the compilations and upgrades being discussed in this vine should be shared online so those who can download it won't take up a slot that others could use. Gym Bitch wrote: If you create two vines (North America and Europe) and 25 people enroll in each vine, you could still be running these two vines one year from now.I think most people are grown up enough to handle copying a couple dvds then mailing it on to the next in line. It shouldn’t take that long, but mail service is unpredictable. Maybe this vine should be done is small segments? For example, roughly 4 smaller vines of a handful of dvds each, so the load is not so much. But first we need the best available versions! |
YourValentine 04.12.2007 16:55 |
From Tokyo 79 there is an alternative DVD on the Wardour Package "Pride And Joy" (4 CDs plus bonus DVD). This pressed DVD comes from the same source (TV) as the previously posted version with the title menu but it has no menu. It does have stereo sound instead of the mpeg sound of the above copy but there is a certain tape noise. The file size is 2,13 GB. |
pittrek 05.12.2007 02:10 |
YourValentine wrote: From Tokyo 79 there is an alternative DVD on the Wardour Package "Pride And Joy" (4 CDs plus bonus DVD). This pressed DVD comes from the same source (TV) as the previously posted version with the title menu but it has no menu. It does have stereo sound instead of the mpeg sound of the above copy but there is a certain tape noise. The file size is 2,13 GB.It sounds interesting. Do you have it ? |
YourValentine 05.12.2007 04:18 |
Well, I did not read in the newspaper about it :) |
pittrek 05.12.2007 04:29 |
YourValentine wrote: Well, I did not read in the newspaper about it :)Well, could you please a) share it or b) send an e-mail to pittrek at hotmail dot com ? :) |
dobo 15.12.2007 20:12 |
Anything on this? |
pittrek 16.12.2007 05:07 |
dobo wrote: Anything on this?A pretty good question ! Joe ???? |
josedequeso 16.12.2007 16:38 |
pittrek wrote:Ha! That made my day, you know my name! I'm so used to people calling me Jose.dobo wrote: Anything on this?A pretty good question ! Joe ???? Well, I'm just waiting for some confirmation on the best available sources. I'd love to have a set of discs out soon. Bob mentioned he has a compilation from the Buenos Aires 81, just needs some lossless audio synched to it. The same goes for Sao Paulo 81 dvd, I tried to synch the audio from the ’84 FM rebroadcast to it and it worked pretty well, I just don't have the necessary software. YV has the Tokyo 4-25-79 DVD in what sounds like very good quality, so if she would like to contribute either by sharing it or mailing anyone of us a copy, that would be great. Some small updates for everyone: my copy of Paris 79 is lossless and my copy of the Champions DVD is nearly lossless. (just has a bad audio bitrate) Pittrek can you send me an email please? Thanks, address in profile. |
pittrek 17.12.2007 06:46 |
josedequeso wrote:You've got mailpittrek wrote:Ha! That made my day, you know my name! I'm so used to people calling me Jose. Well, I'm just waiting for some confirmation on the best available sources. I'd love to have a set of discs out soon. Bob mentioned he has a compilation from the Sao Paolo 81, just needs some lossless audio synched to it. The same goes for Buenos Aires dvd, I tried to synch the audio from the ’84 FM rebroadcast to it and it worked pretty well, I just don't have the necessary software. YV has the Tokyo 4-25-79 DVD in what sounds like very good quality, so if she would like to contribute either by sharing it or mailing anyone of us a copy, that would be great. Some small updates for everyone: my copy of Paris 79 is lossless and my copy of the Champions DVD is nearly lossless. (just has a bad audio bitrate) Pittrek can you send me an email please? Thanks, address in profile.dobo wrote: Anything on this?A pretty good question ! Joe ???? |