QueenZone discussion #1056461

shticky wrote: I read the article (its a long one but very refreshing and interesting to read) and I'd love to believe every word M.V. Ahundova or whatever his name has written. Being gay IS dishonorable. It's not normal. We've just collectively been brain washed in this society to believe that it is normal and OK. But not me. I am not easily persuaded into believing something just because it seems to be the mainstream way to be or think. Some people like to think on their own and quit believing everything that the media or society in general tells them to believe. There are alot of people like this and they are not prudes or religious bigots. Some of them aren't even religious at all. I know people are going to bash this post and say I'm a homophobe or I hate the homosexual lifestyle. Yeah maybe so! So what if I am? How many times have I been bashed by people I deal with everyday at work because I don't go along with just any little thing? Because I don't get drunk every Friday night or take drugs, and I don't ever feel the need for incessant chit chat in the work place, heh! People just can't tolerate that about me and tell me I should change and be more "outgoing". LOL!!!!!! But yet I can't say anything about their lifestyle because that would be called "intolerance". Anyway, why would anyone want to believe that someone they supposedly admire is a homosexual and led that kind of wild and raucus lifestyle? Some people seem to relish in this idea... and wouldn't want to believe anything else about Freddie Mercury as if it was OK for him to be this way. Well it wasn't. That is if it was true! This article (book?) certainly brought home some things to ponder on. Good for you, M.V. Ahundova it's about time somebody showed some deep thought on this subject. For myself I love Queen and their music. Freddie was a beautiful looking specimen of a human being. God he was gorgeous..... But the supposed lifestyle he lead especially in his last years gives me the creeps. That's why I said in another post that he had a dark, death aura around him. He was strangely attractive, yet somehow repulsive. I have been in alot of ways repulsed by Freddie Mercury, even by his looks. Now I know that it's because of all the crap I've read or listened to about him. Because being a fan I naturally wanted to know everything I could find out. It's very weird how even a person's physical appearance changes depending upon how they are perceived to live their life. Maybe all of it is bullshit. I hope so. Freddie Mercury didn't need that kind of lifestyle to be fabulous. People would have loved him the same, and most people even more so if they hadn't believed all that crap. Wasn't his outlandish stage performances enough? Well for myself I want to believe it was all just an act! After reading this article I started to see him in a different light. Even if all the nasty things we read or heard about him are true (If we're honest we know in our hearts not even half of it can be true, and especially NOTHING in Jim Hutton's book....which I have not read...because Jim Hutton just looks like a filthy, lying creep), I can now look at Freddie Mercury and think of him as a different person. A person who could have lived a mild and respectable life. A true showman who shone like the brightest star when he was onstage but when he was alone with himself, was a quiet and gentle man who thought pure and lovely thoughts and dreamed of a family of his own. What's wrong with that? And why would anyone really want to believe anything else? What gives you, or anybody else, the right to make moral judgements on people you don't know? Fair enough, be homophobic, I don't like snakes, rats, dung-beetles or homophobes, but I'd rather keep that to myself.

ANAGRAMER wrote:

shticky wrote: I Fair enough, be homophobic, I don't like snakes, rats, dung-beetles or homophobes, but I'd rather keep that to myself.

My Mini Mercury wrote: Being gay IS dishonorable. It's not normal.

My Mini Mercury wrote: What's wrong with that? And why would anyone really want to believe anything else?

My Mini Mercury wrote: I read the article (its a long one but very refreshing and interesting to read) and I'd love to believe every word M.V. Ahundova or whatever his name has written. Being gay IS dishonorable. It's not normal. We've just collectively been brain washed in this society to believe that it is normal and OK. But not me. I am not easily persuaded into believing something just because it seems to be the mainstream way to be or think. Some people like to think on their own and quit believing everything that the media or society in general tells them to believe. There are alot of people like this and they are not prudes or religious bigots. Some of them aren't even religious at all. I know people are going to bash this post and say I'm a homophobe or I hate the homosexual lifestyle. Yeah maybe so! So what if I am? How many times have I been bashed by people I deal with everyday at work because I don't go along with just any little thing? Because I don't get drunk every Friday night or take drugs, and I don't ever feel the need for incessant chit chat in the work place, heh! People just can't tolerate that about me and tell me I should change and be more "outgoing". LOL!!!!!! But yet I can't say anything about their lifestyle because that would be called "intolerance". Anyway, why would anyone want to believe that someone they supposedly admire is a homosexual and led that kind of wild and raucus lifestyle? Some people seem to relish in this idea... and wouldn't want to believe anything else about Freddie Mercury as if it was OK for him to be this way. Well it wasn't. That is if it was true! This article (book?) certainly brought home some things to ponder on. Good for you, M.V. Ahundova it's about time somebody showed some deep thought on this subject. For myself I love Queen and their music. Freddie was a beautiful looking specimen of a human being. God he was gorgeous..... But the supposed lifestyle he lead especially in his last years gives me the creeps. That's why I said in another post that he had a dark, death aura around him. He was strangely attractive, yet somehow repulsive. I have been in alot of ways repulsed by Freddie Mercury, even by his looks. Now I know that it's because of all the crap I've read or listened to about him. Because being a fan I naturally wanted to know everything I could find out. It's very weird how even a person's physical appearance changes depending upon how they are perceived to live their life. Maybe all of it is bullshit. I hope so. Freddie Mercury didn't need that kind of lifestyle to be fabulous. People would have loved him the same, and most people even more so if they hadn't believed all that crap. Wasn't his outlandish stage performances enough? Well for myself I want to believe it was all just an act! After reading this article I started to see him in a different light. Even if all the nasty things we read or heard about him are true (If we're honest we know in our hearts not even half of it can be true, and especially NOTHING in Jim Hutton's book....which I have not read...because Jim Hutton just looks like a filthy, lying creep), I can now look at Freddie Mercury and think of him as a different person. A person who could have lived a mild and respectable life. A true showman who shone like the brightest star when he was onstage but when he was alone with himself, was a quiet and gentle man who thought pure and lovely thoughts and dreamed of a family of his own. What's wrong with that? And why would anyone really want to believe anything else?

junketerQ2 wrote: Sorry, but being gay is definitely a lifetsyle choice!!!

junketerQ2 wrote: Sorry, but being gay is definitely a lifetsyle choice!!!

Lester Burnham wrote:

junketerQ2 wrote: Sorry, but being gay is definitely a lifetsyle choice!!!

Yes, I can only imagine a 16 year old boy sitting in his room, wondering why he feels so confused about the girls that he likes, knowing that he SHOULD like girls yet doesn't, and deciding that he wants to undergo years of anxiety for cloaking his true sexual identity, then when he finally does come out with his "decision", being subjected to endless name-calling and ignorance from his friends, family, and society in general. Oh, not to mention the whole anal sex thing. That's a definite deal-breaker when it comes to someone deciding he wants to be gay.

Dusta wrote: Does this person truly believe that one cannot have a, "wild and raucus lifestyle," if one is not gay?

My Mini Mercury wrote:

junketerQ2 wrote: Sorry, but being gay is definitely a lifetsyle choice!!!

It's true. I know this sounds cliche but being a pedophile is a choice too. Being a pervert is a choice. Being a rapist is a choice. Being a homosexual is a choice. Being a thief or bank robber is a choice. Or maybe it is all genetic? Doesn't make it right, anyhow. What strikes me is how we got from condemning such a thing years ago, to now declaring one a hero if he admits to homosexuality. Could it be that this society we live in is so morally sick and in denial that we have no other choice? Well, I have a choice and I don't care if you call me a homophobe. It doesn't bother me in the least, because I'm fully aware of the depraved world I live in. And by the way, I don't care for alot of rules either, before anyone goes calling me a stiff prude. I'm kind of rebellious at heart. But that doesn't stop me from knowing right from wrong. I'm still going to have fun. At the end of the day, after a wonderful fun filled day at work I'm still gonna eat dinner with a nice glass of cabernet.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

junketerQ2 wrote: Sorry, but being gay is definitely a lifetsyle choice!!!

It's true. I know this sounds cliche but being a pedophile is a choice too. Being a pervert is a choice. Being a rapist is a choice. Being a homosexual is a choice. Being a thief or bank robber is a choice. Or maybe it is all genetic? Doesn't make it right, anyhow. What strikes me is how we got from condemning such a thing years ago, to now declaring one a hero if he admits to homosexuality. Could it be that this society we live in is so morally sick and in denial that we have no other choice? Well, I have a choice and I don't care if you call me a homophobe. It doesn't bother me in the least, because I'm fully aware of the depraved world I live in. And by the way, I don't care for alot of rules either, before anyone goes calling me a stiff prude. I'm kind of rebellious at heart. But that doesn't stop me from knowing right from wrong. I'm still going to have fun. At the end of the day, after a wonderful fun filled day at work I'm still gonna eat dinner with a nice glass of cabernet.

Lester Burnham wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote:

junketerQ2 wrote: Sorry, but being gay is definitely a lifetsyle choice!!!

It's true. I know this sounds cliche but being a pedophile is a choice too. Being a pervert is a choice. Being a rapist is a choice. Being a homosexual is a choice. Being a thief or bank robber is a choice. Or maybe it is all genetic? Doesn't make it right, anyhow. What strikes me is how we got from condemning such a thing years ago, to now declaring one a hero if he admits to homosexuality. Could it be that this society we live in is so morally sick and in denial that we have no other choice? Well, I have a choice and I don't care if you call me a homophobe. It doesn't bother me in the least, because I'm fully aware of the depraved world I live in. And by the way, I don't care for alot of rules either, before anyone goes calling me a stiff prude. I'm kind of rebellious at heart. But that doesn't stop me from knowing right from wrong. I'm still going to have fun. At the end of the day, after a wonderful fun filled day at work I'm still gonna eat dinner with a nice glass of cabernet.

Being ignorant is a choice too. Why do you choose to be ignorant?

My Mini Mercury wrote: What strikes me is how we got from condemning such a thing years ago, to now declaring one a hero if he admits to homosexuality. Could it be that this society we live in is so morally sick and in denial that we have no other choice?

magicalfreddiemercury wrote: Yes, I think it must be that because if you consider other things we condemned years ago - like women voting or blacks and whites sharing the same public space - and how our views have changed, then it could only be because society is sick and in denial. Or, here's a thought, part of society, the part that accepts people for who they are and as equals, has simply matured. Whereas others... have not.

magicalfreddiemercury wrote: Yes, I think it must be that because if you consider other things we condemned years ago - like women voting or blacks and whites sharing the same public space - and how our views have changed, then it could only be because society is sick and in denial. Or, here's a thought, part of society, the part that accepts people for who they are and as equals, has simply matured. Whereas others... have not.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

magicalfreddiemercury wrote: Yes, I think it must be that because if you consider other things we condemned years ago - like women voting or blacks and whites sharing the same public space - and how our views have changed, then it could only be because society is sick and in denial. Or, here's a thought, part of society, the part that accepts people for who they are and as equals, has simply matured. Whereas others... have not.

Women voting and being born black has got nothing to do with a sexual perversion. And if we must accept people for how they are then why not accept EVERYTHING? Why not accept an underage teenage girl (let's say 14) can have sex with a thirty seven year old man, so long as she's willing? Last time I looked it's still illegal.

magicalfreddiemercury wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote:

magicalfreddiemercury wrote:

That's where maturity comes into play. It's understanding the difference between who people ARE and what people DO. Not everyone is able to distinguish between the two. Apparently.

My Mini Mercury wrote: A black man is a black man. It's WHO HE IS. It has nothing to do with what he DOES unless racial descrimination comes into play, and he finds he can't do everything he wants to do because he feels he is being chastised because of his race, something he can't help. A gay man out of the closet is a gay man. That's who he is and it most definitely determines what he DOES.

LozlanTheMage wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote:

magicalfreddiemercury wrote: That's where maturity comes into play. It's understanding the difference between who people ARE and what people DO. Not everyone is able to distinguish between the two. Apparently.

A black man is a black man. It's WHO HE IS. It has nothing to do with what he DOES unless racial descrimination comes into play, and he finds he can't do everything he wants to do because he feels he is being chastised because of his race, something he can't help. A gay man out of the closet is a gay man. That's who he is and it most definitely determines what he DOES.

And what exactly DOES he do? Does his sexual preference harm you, or indeed anyone? Perhaps you will claim that, yes, homosexuality erodes the fiber of decent god-fearing societies etc. etc. Personally I believe that the god-fearing folk who tie gay men to fences and beat them after dragging them behind their pickup-truck are at the heart of my own nation's disgusting amoral decline, but hey, what do I know? Surly two men who love each other is a far more heinous crime than the persecution and death of a hated minority.

LozlanTheMage wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote: Being gay IS dishonorable. It's not normal.

Treasure Moment wrote: freddie was gay because its a genetic thing, thats what he was, he didnt choose it you ignorant fucking moron

LozlanTheMage wrote: I am bisexual. I am also a suffered of severe, nigh-debilitating Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, kept at bay with a delightful drug cocktail. For the majority of my life I agonized over my own potentiality for homosexuality. I experimented with male friends in my youth, which led me to whip myself with a belt as penance

LozlanTheMage wrote: Gay men tend to catch a great deal of flack from ignorant jackholes who spend their evenings wanking off to lesbian porn.

magicalfreddiemercury wrote: It's like those in-your-face religious types. You know the ones... muslims kneeling and bowing every few hours.

junketerQ2 wrote: Ummmm, ok - what a heated discusssion - lol. Well, I'll just add that Freddie was in a man/woman relationship for some years with Mary Austin & then he decided/chose to end it to live a gay lifestyle - CHOICE!!!

junketerQ2 wrote: Ummmm, ok - what a heated discusssion - lol. Well, I'll just add that Freddie was in a man/woman relationship for some years with Mary Austin & then he decided/chose to end it to live a gay lifestyle - CHOICE!!!

LozlanTheMage wrote: I wanted to extend my heartfelt thanks to the original poster for this lovely gem: "I'M SORRY ABOUT YOUR PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. ALOT OF PEOPLE HAVE THEM AND NEED TO SEEK COUNSELING. THIS TALE SOUNDS ALOT LIKE A PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILING ON CNN I SAW A COUPLE YEARS AGO. THERE WERE CONFESSIONS FROM A CONVICTED RAPIST WHO TOLD IN MINUTE DETAIL THE AGONIES HE FACED WHEN NIGHT FELL AND HE COULDN'T RESTRAIN HIMSELF FROM GOING OUT AND FINDING ANOTHER VICTIM TO RAPE. THERE WERE TEARS IN HIS EYES AS HE BEGGED FOR UNDERSTANDING AND MERCY. THEN THERE WAS THE CLASSIC CHILD MOLESTER. HE COULDN'T CONTROL HIS APPETITE FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. IT WAS IN HIS BLOOD. HE KNEW HE NEEDED TO BE LOCKED UP, BUT HE WAS PLEADING FOR UNDERSTANDING AND MERCY AT THE SAME TIME." Ah, thank you. It is a distinct pleasure to be equated with a serial rapist and a child molester due to my entirely healthy and psychologically sound sexual preferences. Sir, you missed the point entirely.

junketerQ2 wrote: Well, just for the record, I am a huge Queen fan & love them primarily for the awesome music they have made - pure geniuses! The fact that Freddie was gay does not put me off their music one little bit at all. <<However, just because I have an opinion against the homosexual lifestyle does not mean that I hate or cannot tolerate gay people. It is quite simply the "act" that I despise, not the person. Therefore it also does not mean that I am a homophobe. And don't go calling me a bigot because you are in effect a bigot yourself for not tolerating the fact that I have a differing opinion to you!>>> <<<Like I said first off - I loved Freddie & his attributes & gifts that he had & his generosity & love towards others - just don't like the homosexuality.

LozlanTheMage wrote: Fortunately for me I was able (with the help of some new medications)to chase away my personal demons. Many of my obsessions were groundless (that my head would start expanding, that I could never blink to the left, and so on

<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME I salute homosexuality!

My Mini Mercury wrote:

<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME I salute homosexuality!

THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. IT'S GONE BEYOND "TOLERANCE". IT SEEMS THE GAYER A PERSON IS, THE MORE HE'S HAILED A HERO.

<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: It is my personal belief that everyone is prone to homosexuality. In fact, I dare to say that the starter of this thread could one day be attracted to her own gender.

gnomo wrote:

<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: It is my personal belief that everyone is prone to homosexuality. In fact, I dare to say that the starter of this thread could one day be attracted to her own gender.

I agree - I do believe we're all born bisexual, and our choices are only a matter of personal preference, that may shift over time as a result of (changes in) our experiences and environment and mindset...

<font color=#CC0099> *Killer Queen* wrote: It' important that he's good as a person. And that's all what matters.

magicalfreddiemercury wrote:

<font color=#CC0099> *Killer Queen* wrote: It' important that he's good as a person. And that's all what matters.

Though you're 100% correct, the problem lies with those who abhor homosexuality. They rarely see a homosexual as a 'good person' because they feel what they're doing is bad. Logic eludes those people. As we've seen in this thread and others.

Micrówave wrote: Allow me to "plug" something in here. First, the theory that we're all born bi-sexual is crap. Our sexuality develops as we age. Otherwise, I would have never wanted to stop sucking on the tit. There's no gay gene or some little bell that goes off when you're 7 that says "I'm gay". I'm sure science would have figured that out by now, unless "it's a conspiracy!"

LozlanTheMage wrote: link Share and enjoy.

LozlanTheMage wrote: [/QUOTENAME link Share and enjoy.

My Mini Mercury wrote: ENOUGH SAID.

Micrówave wrote: First, the theory that we're all born bi-sexual is crap. Our sexuality develops as we age.

gnomo wrote:

Micrówave wrote: First, the theory that we're all born bi-sexual is crap. Our sexuality develops as we age.

Exactly what I said - we're born with the natural possibility to develop our sexuality in any direction.
I THINK WHAT MICROWAVE MEANS IS THAT WE DON'T START BEING SEXUAL UNTIL WE REACH A CERTAIN AGE.
YOU KNOW, HORMONES AND SUCH.

magicalfreddiemercury wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote: ENOUGH SAID.

To show utter ignorance.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

gnomo wrote:

Micrówave wrote: First, the theory that we're all born bi-sexual is crap. Our sexuality develops as we age.

Exactly what I said - we're born with the natural possibility to develop our sexuality in any direction. I THINK WHAT MICROWAVE MEANS IS THAT WE DON'T START BEING SEXUAL UNTIL WE REACH A CERTAIN AGE. YOU KNOW, HORMONES AND SUCH.

I'm assuming that you've spent very little time around small children. Even infants derive great pleasure from stimulating their genitals. Freud was a hack in many respects, but his observations of psychosexual development in infants and toddlers remain particularly intriguing.
I'm curious as to your opinions on sexual development in children. Your reference to hormones implies an equating of puberty to sexual awakening; this is an archly conservative thought, founded solely in the desire to de-sexualize our children to avoid personal discomfiture.
Again, I would direct your attention to the Kinsey report. Via some admittedly dubious sources, Kinsey acquired information on orgasms in pre-pubescent children. There is no age specific to sexual exploration; we are creatures of erotic sensation even in the womb. Any disavowment of said awareness is merely a personalized strategy designed to justify depriving our children of sex education, thereby sparing our own conservative sensibilities surrounding sexuality. Unfortunately this suppressing trend prevents many children from developing a stable sexual identity early in life. Heck, it may even be 'responsible' for shoving children out of the heteronormative mode into homosexual experimentation.
Me? I believe in rudimentary sex ed in Kindergarten. Understanding burgeoning sexual preference and awareness is integral to a healthy and non-destructive approach to relationships and, moreover, self-acceptance.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

magicalfreddiemercury wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote: ENOUGH SAID.

To show utter ignorance.

NO.......YOU'RE IGNORANT IF YOU BUY THE CRAP PRESENTED IN THIS ARTICLE. HOW MANY HOMOSEXUALS OR BISEXUALS DO YOU KNOW ARE HERMAPHRODITES?

<font color=#CC0099> *Killer Queen* wrote: this reminds me of topic called "how gay was Queen?" from >>don't try suicide<<, but at the end he told us that he was just joking. But as far as I can see you are totally serious.

LozlanTheMage wrote: link Share and enjoy.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

<font color=#CC0099> *Killer Queen* wrote: this reminds me of topic called "how gay was Queen?" from >>don't try suicide<<, but at the end he told us that he was just joking. But as far as I can see you are totally serious.

I TAKE IT THAT YOU WANTED ME TO SAY I WAS ONLY JOKING.

<font color=#CC0099> *Killer Queen* wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote:

<font color=#CC0099> *Killer Queen* wrote: Why are you using Caps Lock all the time? Does that mean that you are yelling? Ok, calm down.

OBOY HERE WE GO WITH THAT PHENOMENON. WHOEVER CAME UP WITH THIS CRAP ABOUT "CAPS LOCK" AND "YELLING"? DON'T TELL ME IT'S BEEN AN INTERNET STANDARD FOR YEARS I ALREADY KNOW THAT. I'D JUST LIKE TO KNOW WHO CAME UP WITH IT.

Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME Uh, dude, hate to break this news to Science and all, but worms are Asexual. All worms have both parts. So what exactly is a male worm? (please, no "male worm" jokes, I wasn't trying to open the flood gates) So we all read that article for what reason?

Serry<br><font size=1>The FLACer</font> wrote: Google ads shows banners about gays now in this thread! Starter of the topic spreads homosexuality over the board. Well, I suppose someone has already the gallows in its face, so the QZ hangman is awaiting...

Serry<br><font size=1>The FLACer</font> wrote: I've had enough of those discussions on Russian Queen forums and all those lovely arguements like "Peter Freestone is a liar! - Why? - His face looks like he's a pig, Serry!"
PETER FREESTONE LOOKS LIKE YOUR TYPICAL LIE LOVING OLD GOSSIP SPREADING BIDDY IN THE WORKPLACE. TRUE ENOUGH. I WISH SCIENCE WOULD START PERFORMING EXPERIMENTS ON HOW FACIAL CHARACTERISTICS RELATE TO ONE'S PERSONAL CHARACTER. THAT WOULD BE COOL.
(JUST KIDDING)

My Mini Mercury wrote:

LozlanTheMage wrote: Fortunately for me I was able (with the help of some new medications)to chase away my personal demons. Many of my obsessions were groundless (that my head would start expanding, that I could never blink to the left, and so on

THIS REMINDS ME OF A "PERSONAL DEMON" I HAVE. I HAVE BEEN OBSESSED WITH THE NUMBER 4 SINCE I WAS THREE, BECAUSE IT'S A PERFECTLY NICE AND EVEN NUMBER. I ALWAYS COUNT OUT 4 OF EVERYTHING. IF I RAP MY FINGERS ON A TABLE, IT MUST BE 4 TIMES OR SEVERAL SETS (ALL EVEN NUMBERS) OF RAPS EACH SET CONSISTING OF 4 TAPS. AND IF A "RAP SET" HAPPENS TO END IN AN UNEVEN NUMBER BECAUSE I WAS TEMPORARILY DISTRACTED BY SOMEONE TALKING TO ME OR WHATEVER, I AM ACUTELY CONSCIOUS OF IT AND MUST THEN ADD AND EXTRA "RAP" FOLLOWED BY AT LEAST 4 MORE SETS OF RAPS. IF I SQUINT OR BLINK MY EYES, IT INVARIABLE MUST BE 4 EQUAL BLINKS OR SQUINTS, OR SEVERAL SETS OF 4. THE NUMBER 3 JUST KIND OF HANGS THERE AND IF I TAKE JUST 3 COOKIES INSTEAD OF 4, THE 3rd COOKIE ALWAYS SEEMS SO LONELY AND I MUST REACH FOR ANOTHER ONE. OF COURSE IF THERE ARE ONLY 3 COOKIES LEFT IN THE JAR, AND I HAVE A NICE COLD GLASS OF MILK, I HURRY UP AND EAT THE 3rd ONE, AND WITH LESS RELISH THAN I WILL EAT THE OTHER TWO. THAT 3rd COOKIE JUST DOESN'T HAVE THE SAME APPEAL FOR ME AS IT WOULD IF IT HAD A "MATE" WITH IT. BUT WITH THE REMAINING TWO COOKIES I WILL INDULGE MYSELF AND EAT THEM SLOWLY WITH THE GLASS OF MILK. HOWEVER, IF I HAVE 4 COOKIES ALTOGETHER....I EAT THEM ALL WITH EQUAL TIMING AND RELISH, AND I TRY TO END IT WITH EQUAL NUMBER OF BITES, PREFERABLY IN SETS OF 4. I'VE NEVER FIGURED OUT HOW I COULD CONTROL THIS. SOME OF MY FRIENDS HAVE SUGGESTED THERAPY OR HYPNOSIS. IT HAS BECOME A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE PAST TWO YEARS BECAUSE AS A RESULT OF THIS "OBSESSION" I DEVELOPED A HABIT OF FLEXING THE MUSCLES IN MY SHOULDERS....FIRST THE LEFT ONE, THEN THE RIGHT...IN MANY SETS OF 4. I SAT IN A CLASS FOR A SOLID HOUR ONE DAY DOING THIS AND DEVELOPED A SERIOUS CASE OF BURSITIS AS AS RESULT.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

<<<ONCE AGAIN I'LL SAY. DO IT IN PRIVACY. YOU DON'T NEED TO TELL ANYONE. NOONE NEEDS TO KNOW!
I SUFFER FROM A SKIN CONDITION THAT FLARES UP FROM TIME TO TIME. IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH MY IMMUNE SYSTEM. IT IS TOO STRONG AND IT ATTACKS ME. SOMETIMES MY SKIN IS PERFECT. OTHER TIMES (MOST OF THE TIME) IT FLARES UP AND IT IS HIDEOUS. I MUST COVER IT UP WITH LONG SLEEVES, EVEN IN THE HOT WRETCHED SUMMERTIME. NOONE KNOWS. I KEEP IT TO MYSELF NOT FEELING THE NEED TO ADVERTISE THIS CONDITION TO EVERYONE.<<<<
<<<<<I'M A VERY QUIET IN PERSON. I'VE NEVER INSTILLED FEAR IN ANYONE. >>>
<<<<When my dog runs through said neighbors yard on occasion, I get much grief over it. They even called the police on me one day because my dog was in their yard. He wasn't doing anything, just laying on their porch because he used to live there (The people who used to live their gave him to me.)
But that was ok, we accepted it and he has to stay inside my house when Im gone so he won't go over there. >>>
I MADE THIS UP TOO.
FROM NOW ON DON'T BE SO GULLIBLE.

Serry<br><font size=1>The FLACer</font> wrote: "PETER FREESTONE LOOKS LIKE YOUR TYPICAL LIE LOVING OLD GOSSIP SPREADING BIDDY IN THE WORKPLACE." This is what I wrote you about, guys! Those chapelgoers are more dangerous than the FLAC supporters!

Micrówave wrote: worms are Asexual. All worms have both parts.

gnomo wrote:

Micrówave wrote: worms are Asexual. All worms have both parts.

that's a self-contradicting statement. If they have both male and female fully-functioning reproductive organs, then they are ERMAPHRODITES, by definition of the word.

<b><font color=007788>?Freya? wrote:

gnomo wrote:

Micrówave wrote: worms are Asexual. All worms have both parts.

that's a self-contradicting statement. If they have both male and female fully-functioning reproductive organs, then they are ERMAPHRODITES, by definition of the word.

Isn't the correct spelling "Hermaphrodite" ?

gnomo wrote:

Micrówave wrote: worms are Asexual. All worms have both parts.

that's a self-contradicting statement.

Lisser wrote: Fuck's sake, quit feeding Mini Mercury. Thank you for your interesting posts Lozlan. I enjoyed them.

Lisser wrote: Fuck's sake, quit feeding Mini Mercury. Thank you for your interesting posts Lozlan. I enjoyed them.

LozlanTheMage wrote: [QUOTE
Thanks much. In the spirit of closing this thread I will no longer be posting; Mini Mercury's cheerful revelations concerning her 'made up' posts have convinced me that she has no particular respect for the argument at hand or those participating in it.
Actually, I'm fairly offended by the detailed post concerning her obsessive tendencies; I felt some true sympathy for a moment. To have the whole production revealed as a farce shoots down any respect I have for her argument (which was scant enough at the onset).
YOU MEAN YOU ACTUALLY FELT SORRY FOR ME?
AND I BLEW THE WHOLE THING BY SAYING IT WAS MADE UP. DAMN.
<<<(you might be intensely surprised to learn how much genetic material we share with bananas). >>>>
THEN I GUESS THEY COULD HAVE USED BANANAS IN THE SEXUAL ATTRACTION EXPERIMENT AND IT WOULD HAVE ALL COME OUT THE SAME.
<<<Signing off.>>>
YEAH RIGHT.

LozlanTheMage wrote:

Lisser wrote: Fuck's sake, quit feeding Mini Mercury. Thank you for your interesting posts Lozlan. I enjoyed them.

Thanks much. In the spirit of closing this thread I will no longer be posting; Mini Mercury's cheerful revelations concerning her 'made up' posts have convinced me that she has no particular respect for the argument at hand or those participating in it. Actually, I'm fairly offended by the detailed post concerning her obsessive tendencies; I felt some true sympathy for a moment. To have the whole production revealed as a farce shoots down any respect I have for her argument (which was scant enough at the onset). A final word on the worms: the fact that they are hermaphroditic is irrelevant. We are all evolved from lifeforms that initially reproduced through binary fission and, later, hermaphroditic processes. Evolution is a spiralling chain of higher life derived from the lower; thus any discovery effecting the lowliest of creatures has wide-ranging effects on the species subsequently derived from them. We all originate from the same stuff (you might be intensely surprised to learn how much genetic material we share with bananas). Thus a discovery low on the evolutionary ladder has far-reaching effects over the stratum of all earthly life. Signing off.

My Mini Mercury wrote: I'm sticking by what I said though. I have nothing against homosexuals. They are human beings with feelings. What I do have a problem with is homosexuals telling me there is nothing wrong with homosexuality and that it's normal. THAT is a delusion. It's deceptive and wrong.

Sparrow wrote: im curious MMM, what would happen if your future child came home one day and said 'mom, i have to confess. im gay.' or your (son) says 'mom, i kinda did some things with a boy, and i liked it' would you condemn the child you love, and just seconds before was the same person before telling these thing to you, simply because of their lifestyle?

<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote:

you should never call your beliefs true unless you have substantial evidence to back your claims up.

MY EVIDENCE TO BACK UP MY BELIEF IS THIS:
IF MEN WERE MEANT TO SLEEP WITH MEN.....THEN MEN WOULD NOT JUST HAVE THEIR OWN PARTS....BUT FEMALE ONES AS WELL....SO THEY COULD FIT BOTH WAYS. SAME WITH WOMEN.
AND PLEASE DONT TELL ME ABOUT THE ANAL SEX. OBVIOUSLY THAT IS NOT WHAT THAT PLACE IS FOR.

My Mini Mercury wrote: MY EVIDENCE TO BACK UP MY BELIEF IS THIS: IF MEN WERE MEANT TO SLEEP WITH MEN.....THEN MEN WOULD NOT JUST HAVE THEIR OWN PARTS....BUT FEMALE ONES AS WELL....SO THEY COULD FIT BOTH WAYS. SAME WITH WOMEN. AND PLEASE DONT TELL ME ABOUT THE ANAL SEX. OBVIOUSLY THAT IS NOT WHAT THAT PLACE IS FOR.

My Mini Mercury wrote:

Sparrow wrote: im curious MMM, what would happen if your future child came home one day and said 'mom, i have to confess. im gay.' or your (son) says 'mom, i kinda did some things with a boy, and i liked it' would you condemn the child you love, and just seconds before was the same person before telling these thing to you, simply because of their lifestyle?

NO. I WOULDN'T CONDEMN HIM BUT I SURE AS HELL WOULD CONDEMN HIS ACTIONS. ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF WHY HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD KEEP THEIR SEXUAL PREFERENCES TO THEMSELVES. IT REALLY HURTS THE PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT YOU MOST. IF YOU LUST AFTER SOMEONE OF THE SAME SEX AND YOU JUST CAN'T HELP YOURSELF.....THEN JUST DO IT IN PRIVATE GET IT OUT OF YOUR SYSTEM WHATEVER. NO NEED TO TELL ANYONE ELSE ABOUT IT. WHO'S TO SAY LATER ON DOWN THE ROAD YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND? THIS WHOLE "COMING OUT" THING IS BULLSH&%T. EVERYONE HAS DEEP SEATED SECRETS AND DEMONS AND TORMENTS THAT ARE NO EASIER TO BEAR THAN WHAT HOMOSEXUALS THINK THEY HAVE TO DEAL WITH. NO NEED TO EXPOSE THEM FOR EVERYONE ELSE TO SEE.

<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote:

My Mini Mercury wrote: MY EVIDENCE TO BACK UP MY BELIEF IS THIS: IF MEN WERE MEANT TO SLEEP WITH MEN.....THEN MEN WOULD NOT JUST HAVE THEIR OWN PARTS....BUT FEMALE ONES AS WELL....SO THEY COULD FIT BOTH WAYS. SAME WITH WOMEN. AND PLEASE DONT TELL ME ABOUT THE ANAL SEX. OBVIOUSLY THAT IS NOT WHAT THAT PLACE IS FOR.

Your evidence isn't substantial enough.

My Mini Mercury wrote: Guess I lose you win.

andrewpatrick wrote: when was the last time Mr Ahundova got his gardener to bathe him and video it at the same time!! MR AHUNDOVA YOU DEFINATLEY ARE A TWAT!!!

Missreclusive wrote: Am raising a 13 yr old guy who loves Queen and Freddie M. He doesn't realize anything with regard to Freddies sexuality...he assumes he was heterosexual. The kid has watched Freddie interviews and concerts with Freddie prancing around in leotards and has also seen the IWTBF vid but still doesn't see Freddie as gay. We just enjoy the music and Freddies personality both on stage and off. Now, this same kid has developed predjudice towards gays and also hispanics. Why? Because of the "in your face" stuff. He has seen the hispanics in our area act like little gang members and has witnessed flamboyant lisping gays... he finds it distasteful. Have I taught him this? no. He made up his own mind, this kid a top student, plays music and sports and is well thought of in the community. I think sexuality is a personal issue and shouldn't be shoved in anyones face...period. But then the world is full of people who feel they must do this and they don't care that it offends people. Thank you for this testimonial, I am reassured to know that children can recognize the real Freddy and do not buy into this fake gay propaganda.

Holly2003 wrote: Flores, cherry-picking bits from the Bible to support your anti-gay beliefs is the worst kind of intellectual and moral cowardice. You live in the Dark Ages. No one cares what you think any more than they care about the views of lunatics who think the world is flat or that comets are evil omens. You are irrelevent. .

ITWEMBLEY86 wrote: Mr. Ahundova lived and lives- behind the iron curtain, and as such does not believe anything the media says or said. which is a reasonable position when faced with a culture of total propoganda, but it seems insane to the enlightened western culture who believe anything they read. except for "the gospel truth" of course.

Zaza Gabor wrote: QUOTE "However, there’s one thing about those chaos-coming-soon websites you go to next; something that I’m just curious about. There homosexuals are dubbed as “sodomites” and “pedophiles”, despite that these words are not synonyms; and there isn’t mentioned that both sodomy and pedophilia can be [and way too often are] committed by heterosexuals as well."QUOTE Actually it IS mentioned: "Homosexual apologists, admit that some homosexuals sexually molest children, but they vehemently deny that homosexuals are more likely to commit such offences. They cleverly argue that the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature and produce convincing statistics to support their argument. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, they conveniently ignore the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population. If pushed these venal minds will cite the claim of a so-called sex researcher Alfred Kinsey that at least 10 percent of the population is homosexual. This figure is a fallacy. The facts of the matter are these: men commit almost all sex crimes against children. Therefore, paedophiles are invariably males. Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls). Therefore, by definition and probability the act is by pederasts who are ipso facto homosexual. The figure cited by Alfred Kinsey and promoted by vested interests that homosexuals comprise 10 percent of the population has been proved a fallacy by authorities that are more circumspect and decidedly less venal. The figure is between 1 to 3 percent of the population. Individuals from this tiny minority (1 to 3 percent of the population) that are sexually attracted to the same sex commit up to one-third of the sex crimes against children. Therefore, homosexuals are over represented in child sex offences. Homosexuals comprise by far the greatest group of sexual predators of children and the lifting of the moral restraints and the legal sanctions against them merely emboldens would be paedophiles. These are the facts this is the reality.