QueenZone discussion #1042276

<font color=FF9900>Mr Mercury</font> wrote: The singing on this demo is rubbish to be honest, which is a pity because the song itself sounded like a good idea. Maybe you should look at getting in someone who can sing to do your stuff justice.

Mercuryworks wrote: It should be in personal section as for the singer drop the accent makes you sound retarded no offense

Treasure Moment wrote: better than U2 or rolling stones ever did or beatles for that matter.

Leaky Luke wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: better than U2 or rolling stones ever did or beatles for that matter.

You finally got a certain amount of good feedback and you start to say this?! You're really unbelievable.

Treasure Moment wrote: it wasnt me who posted this in the beginning, my brother and i are very different

Wiley wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: it wasnt me who posted this in the beginning, my brother and i are very different

Yes, your brother is not that much of an asshole like you, hehe :). The song is quite good. I enjoyed it a lot. Not too keen on the vocals still but the song is nice. I could see it in an edited version on MTV, sung by Evanescence or someone like that. Have you considered having a female lead vocalist? or at least someone that can actually sing very good. Your voices are good for demos but not enough for a commercial record, I think. Wiley

.*.Messenger: Jake Pyndle.*. wrote: I just wrote a new instrumental which would blow those guys off the planet. And I can sing better than them! LoL

Treasure Moment wrote:

.*.Messenger: Jake Pyndle.*. wrote: I just wrote a new instrumental which would blow those guys off the planet. And I can sing better than them! LoL

alright, let me listen to it.

<font color=FF9900>Mr Mercury</font> wrote: The singing on this demo is rubbish to be honest, which is a pity because the song itself sounded like a good idea. Maybe you should look at getting in someone who can sing to do your stuff justice.

Wiley wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: it wasnt me who posted this in the beginning, my brother and i are very different

Yes, your brother is not that much of an asshole like you, hehe :). The song is quite good. I enjoyed it a lot. Not too keen on the vocals still but the song is nice. I could see it in an edited version on MTV, sung by Evanescence or someone like that. Have you considered having a female lead vocalist? or at least someone that can actually sing very good. Your voices are good for demos but not enough for a commercial record, I think. Wiley

Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:

Wiley wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: it wasnt me who posted this in the beginning, my brother and i are very different

Yes, your brother is not that much of an asshole like you, hehe :). The song is quite good. I enjoyed it a lot. Not too keen on the vocals still but the song is nice. I could see it in an edited version on MTV, sung by Evanescence or someone like that. Have you considered having a female lead vocalist? or at least someone that can actually sing very good. Your voices are good for demos but not enough for a commercial record, I think. Wiley

I wouldnt want to edit the song , i think its good the way it is. Even if it was edited , i wouldnt think MTV would play this kind of deep depressing music. ( they did 80s-mid 90s) But now its all about shallow tunes that last 3.30 min. Its part of making everyone become less emotional and more robotic.

.*.Messenger: Jake Pyndle.*. wrote:

Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:

Wiley wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: it wasnt me who posted this in the beginning, my brother and i are very different

Yes, your brother is not that much of an asshole like you, hehe :). The song is quite good. I enjoyed it a lot. Not too keen on the vocals still but the song is nice. I could see it in an edited version on MTV, sung by Evanescence or someone like that. Have you considered having a female lead vocalist? or at least someone that can actually sing very good. Your voices are good for demos but not enough for a commercial record, I think. Wiley

I wouldnt want to edit the song , i think its good the way it is. Even if it was edited , i wouldnt think MTV would play this kind of deep depressing music. ( they did 80s-mid 90s) But now its all about shallow tunes that last 3.30 min. Its part of making everyone become less emotional and more robotic.

I didn't find the song depressing. In fact, why the fuck would you call it that?

Togg wrote: Which ever one of you posted it (I care not) why oh why do you persist in doing this? Can either of you grasp the simple concept of forums for different sections of a website? seems not Can you both stop posting this rubbish in any other section than the correct one.

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

yeah whatever, spend 25 years more, if you dont know what good music is it doesnt matter if you spend 100 years in it. Your words mean nothing to me because you know nothing.

Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

yeah whatever, spend 25 years more, if you dont know what good music is it doesnt matter if you spend 100 years in it. Your words mean nothing to me because you know nothing.

Hilarious, really.

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

yeah whatever, spend 25 years more, if you dont know what good music is it doesnt matter if you spend 100 years in it. Your words mean nothing to me because you know nothing.

Crezchi wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

yeah whatever, spend 25 years more, if you dont know what good music is it doesnt matter if you spend 100 years in it. Your words mean nothing to me because you know nothing.

You sound like one of those idiots on American Idol who get bad critism and lash out at Simon Cowell and say 'I don't care what you say i can sing' Maybe you can perform a cover od she bangs? Why not take the critism from people who have been there and done that and just use that to get better instead of talking childish shit? Your attitude alone will prevent you from EVER getting a deal, it's possible to get a deal from your music, obviously because anyone can get a deal, and btw you talk your flack about these newer bands and you guys are so supreme to them?! NOT! I will tell you that you sound like any other band on MTV/VH1 with the exception that they can sing, and they don't use gay ass Europe theme's, oh yeah, they have a recording deal and sell millions. Hmm, convinced yet?

<font color=chartreuse>Thirtynine? wrote: Mmm. I don't think I'm ever going to bother listening to your music, because it's performed by a pompous, self-proclaimed "musical genius." Besides, I'm too stupid to understand how "complex" the music is, right? I won't bother to post any more about this, so good luck. :)

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

yeah whatever, spend 25 years more, if you dont know what good music is it doesnt matter if you spend 100 years in it. Your words mean nothing to me because you know nothing.

Togg wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: Having spent the last 25 years in music/media industry I can safely say that you will never get signed, so you might as well enjoy the flak on Queenzone, because frankly here is the only place your music will ever get heard.

yeah whatever, spend 25 years more, if you dont know what good music is it doesnt matter if you spend 100 years in it. Your words mean nothing to me because you know nothing.

Well easy to say when you are looking in from the outside, come back when you have earnt you living from the band for 20 years. Until then my friend you have about as much credibility as chewing gum on the street.

Togg wrote: So come on then, define 'good music'? if you know so much about it and everyone else is wrong, all the millions of people all over the world that have bought albums from all the bands you seem to hate. what makes them wrong? and you with your band that has sold nothing right? What makes good music good? Since you obviously feel sales play no part, define what does? we'd all love to know because all I can see is you shouting everyone down with nothing to back your argument up, just nonesense about how you know better than anyone else. If you could back your argument up it might be an interesting debate, but as it stands you just look a fool.

Micrówave wrote: Can someone tell me why the Sloppy Joe mix is not on the shelf next to chili but usually found next to canned/jarred spaghetti sauce. A manwich is hardly Italian.

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: So come on then, define 'good music'? if you know so much about it and everyone else is wrong, all the millions of people all over the world that have bought albums from all the bands you seem to hate. what makes them wrong? and you with your band that has sold nothing right? What makes good music good? Since you obviously feel sales play no part, define what does? we'd all love to know because all I can see is you shouting everyone down with nothing to back your argument up, just nonesense about how you know better than anyone else. If you could back your argument up it might be an interesting debate, but as it stands you just look a fool.

listen to Queen, thats good music, awesome melodies,structure,singing, catchiness. Thats the perfect example of how good music should be.

Togg wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: So come on then, define 'good music'? if you know so much about it and everyone else is wrong, all the millions of people all over the world that have bought albums from all the bands you seem to hate. what makes them wrong? and you with your band that has sold nothing right? What makes good music good? Since you obviously feel sales play no part, define what does? we'd all love to know because all I can see is you shouting everyone down with nothing to back your argument up, just nonesense about how you know better than anyone else. If you could back your argument up it might be an interesting debate, but as it stands you just look a fool.

listen to Queen, thats good music, awesome melodies,structure,singing, catchiness. Thats the perfect example of how good music should be.

Great argument! well constructed and carefully considered, boy your mum must be proud! Any song with a melody, singing and structure gets my vote. here here.

Treasure Moment wrote: They dont have any bad songs.

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: So come on then, define 'good music'? if you know so much about it and everyone else is wrong, all the millions of people all over the world that have bought albums from all the bands you seem to hate. what makes them wrong? and you with your band that has sold nothing right? What makes good music good? Since you obviously feel sales play no part, define what does? we'd all love to know because all I can see is you shouting everyone down with nothing to back your argument up, just nonesense about how you know better than anyone else. If you could back your argument up it might be an interesting debate, but as it stands you just look a fool.

listen to Queen, thats good music, awesome melodies,structure,singing, catchiness. Thats the perfect example of how good music should be.

Great argument! well constructed and carefully considered, boy your mum must be proud! Any song with a melody, singing and structure gets my vote. here here.

not any song, i dont need to explain what it is, i just know it and queen is the perfect example of it. They dont have any bad songs.

Knute wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: They dont have any bad songs.

Yeah, Body Language is a shimmering oasis in a desert full of crappy music and bands, like the Beatles for example. Body Language is 100x better than any Beatles song ever written.

LozlanTheMage wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Togg wrote: So come on then, define 'good music'? if you know so much about it and everyone else is wrong, all the millions of people all over the world that have bought albums from all the bands you seem to hate. what makes them wrong? and you with your band that has sold nothing right? What makes good music good? Since you obviously feel sales play no part, define what does? we'd all love to know because all I can see is you shouting everyone down with nothing to back your argument up, just nonesense about how you know better than anyone else. If you could back your argument up it might be an interesting debate, but as it stands you just look a fool.

listen to Queen, thats good music, awesome melodies,structure,singing, catchiness. Thats the perfect example of how good music should be.

Great argument! well constructed and carefully considered, boy your mum must be proud! Any song with a melody, singing and structure gets my vote. here here.

not any song, i dont need to explain what it is, i just know it and queen is the perfect example of it. They dont have any bad songs.

Actually, if you are attempting to make a reasoned argument that will convince anyone, you will find that you do actually have to explain things. Saying something is a perfect example but being unable to state in any fashion why it is a perfect example is indicative of an opinion, not a fact. You enjoy Queen's music more than any other band's because you enjoy Queen's music. Thus far that is all you've convinced me of, matey.

Lester Burnham wrote: Seriously... why even bother arguing? It's obvious this whole thing is a wind-up that's outstayed its welcome thirty seconds after it first started. No one can be so deluded as to think that a simple garage band with generic instruments, melodies, and lyrics could be better than some of the most influential musicians in the past few generations. And if they are that deluded, then they seriously need professional help. Either way, it's not worth giving any more time or attention to Treasure Moment and their hilariously confrontational personnel. Why dignify them with any kind of response? You're just giving them attention, and they're getting a reaction out of you, and that's all they need to keep posting on the board. If you really want to offer them comments, good or bad, leave them on their Myspace page, but just let the threads they start here die.

Wiley wrote: TM, you are wrong... in so many ways. Stop talking about FACTS which are not facts but your (shitty) opinion. On the other hand, Body Language, Dancer and (on the whole) the Hot Space album is a guilty pleasure of mine. I can enjoy and like Body Language more than some of the Beatles tracks but that is my personal taste. Still, I believe they were geniuses. I think you're trapped within a character you created many posts ago.

Treasure Moment wrote: its not a character, its me

Wiley wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: its not a character, its me

I'm SO sorry to read that, I really am. My deepest condolences. Have a nice life (you need to get one first, btw).

Treasure Moment wrote: im sorry that you are you too, my deepest condolenses.