Hey Guys,
Check out my delightful present for Freddie's B-Day this year: link. My contribution? A wonderful new criticism section! Laugh with me here, and feel free to contibute all you want. Ha Ha Ha. At the same time, some "RS" asshole is trying to delete some of my references. I warned his that this constitutes article vandalism, but he does not really care.
I have to say that I blame "RS" for their ignorance on everything from '50s music to heavy metal. But I am mostly just trying to go after them for their hateful reviews and ignorant omissions of Queen over the years.
By the way, note already that this idiot is erasing links that I put up. I guess that he works for "RS."
deleted user 03.09.2007 13:31
Sorry, can't help - too busy affixing "diamonds" to a silver jock strap that I plan to send to Mary Austin in the hopes that she'll bury it with his ashes.
I'll support anybody who is against Rolling Stone Magazine, however, what it really comes down to is if 'you' like an artist. I find it a waste of time to complain about one magazine when you, just like everybody else, could disregard what you read in the papers and simply enjoy the music.
Freddie's #1 Fan Forever wrote: Hey Guys,
Check out my delightful present for Freddie's B-Day this year: link. My contribution? A wonderful new criticism section! Laugh with me here, and feel free to contibute all you want. Ha Ha Ha. At the same time, some "RS" asshole is trying to delete some of my references. I warned his that this constitutes article vandalism, but he does not really care.
I have to say that I blame "RS" for their ignorance on everything from '50s music to heavy metal. But I am mostly just trying to go after them for their hateful reviews and ignorant omissions of Queen over the years.
Once again Freddie's #1 Fan Forever proves how little value wikipedia has.
Instead of dealing with verifiable factual info on wikipedia we get some idiotic moron's vendetta against a magazine.