what are you going to do once every single
queen song is found in the vault and every possible track is used for whatever queen productions purpose?
paint? rebuild an old funny car? stay at home with the kids? start a deep purple tribute band?
Greg is not an QP employee, he is self employed and working on a contractural basis for queen to archive their recordings.
my guess is (correct me if i am wrong) when his contract expires it would be like any other self-employed worker - he will have arranged whatever other work he wants.
let's face it there's thousands of bands out there - esp from 60s and 70s who would want their stuff archiving...and he may not even be strictly a sound archivist...he may have work in books, films, etc
I think its interesting everyone is so quick to believe that the poster calling himself "Queen Archivist" is actually Greg Brooks?! i mean, i could create an account called Greg Brooks. Has this guy ever provided evidence that he is who he says he is??
inmydefence wrote: I think its interesting everyone is so quick to believe that the poster calling himself "Queen Archivist" is actually Greg Brooks?! i mean, i could create an account called Greg Brooks. Has this guy ever provided evidence that he is who he says he is??
you need to proove your self to actually make a vaild point first.
inmydefence wrote: I think its interesting everyone is so quick to believe that the poster calling himself "Queen Archivist" is actually Greg Brooks?! i mean, i could create an account called Greg Brooks. Has this guy ever provided evidence that he is who he says he is??
you need to proove your self to actually make a vaild point first.
are you gonna troll every post i make?
I was simply asking the question, Has this the "Queen Archivist" ever proved he IS who he claims to be. as people on this board seem more than happy to devote entire threads on asking him questions about the Queen Archives.
So, i have to prove that he's NOT who he says he is, before you'll take my advice of "dont believe that everyone on the internet IS who their screen name suggests they are"!?
You're wrong in the head mate.
inmydefence wrote: I think its interesting everyone is so quick to believe that the poster calling himself "Queen Archivist" is actually Greg Brooks?! i mean, i could create an account called Greg Brooks. Has this guy ever provided evidence that he is who he says he is??
you need to proove your self to actually make a vaild point first.
are you gonna troll every post i make?
I was simply asking the question, Has this the "Queen Archivist" ever proved he IS who he claims to be. as people on this board seem more than happy to devote entire threads on asking him questions about the Queen Archives.
So, i have to prove that he's NOT who he says he is, before you'll take my advice of "dont believe that everyone on the internet IS who their screen name suggests they are"!?
You're wrong in the head mate.
Actually did you ever think maybe I am wrong in the head....??? No,, you dont think, your an impulsive prat,
It would seem i guessed right then! that would explain the illogical arguments and random abuse that you spew with every post!