Mr.Jingles 01.06.2007 08:15 |
Biggest Queen rip-off? |
FriedChicken 01.06.2007 08:55 |
Valensia At least The Darkness and Mika write original songs |
The Fairy King 01.06.2007 09:16 |
FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote: Valensia At least The Darkness and Mika write original songsDitto. |
Matias Merçeauroix 01.06.2007 12:33 |
Valensia's the only one that can actually sound like Queen. But then again, Mika is not a Queen ripoff. The Darkness just stole a few riffs, and Valensia stole the sound. |
Haystacks Calhoun II 01.06.2007 12:47 |
Check out Justin's myspace page.... Got 4 new tunes on there, all of them pretty darn good. link |
The Fairy King 01.06.2007 13:45 |
Gay in the 80's!!!! XD Luv it! |
runy 03.06.2007 13:45 |
Mika :P |
FriedChicken 05.06.2007 07:18 |
Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Valensia's the only one that can actually sound like Queen. But then again, Mika is not a Queen ripoff. The Darkness just stole a few riffs, and Valensia stole the sound.Why do you want to sound like Queen? Isn't it more challanging to make your own sound? |
AspiringPhilosophe 05.06.2007 10:30 |
FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote:HA HA! Brilliant!!!Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Valensia's the only one that can actually sound like Queen. But then again, Mika is not a Queen ripoff. The Darkness just stole a few riffs, and Valensia stole the sound.Why do you want to sound like Queen? Isn't it more challanging to make your own sound? And so true, by the way. This is why Valensia is not a complex artists, though his songs may be technically complex...it's still just a copy in the end, which makes it simple. |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.06.2007 12:21 |
FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote:I do not want to sound like Queen. But saying IT'S A RIP-OFF it's so easy. Have you ever tried to sound like Queen? It's no walk in the park.Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Valensia's the only one that can actually sound like Queen. But then again, Mika is not a Queen ripoff. The Darkness just stole a few riffs, and Valensia stole the sound.Why do you want to sound like Queen? Isn't it more challanging to make your own sound? |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.06.2007 12:21 |
CMU HistoryGirl wrote:That makes no sense.FriedChicken<br><font size=1>The Almighty</font> wrote:HA HA! Brilliant!!! And so true, by the way. This is why Valensia is not a complex artists, though his songs may be technically complex...it's still just a copy in the end, which makes it simple.Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Valensia's the only one that can actually sound like Queen. But then again, Mika is not a Queen ripoff. The Darkness just stole a few riffs, and Valensia stole the sound.Why do you want to sound like Queen? Isn't it more challanging to make your own sound? |
AspiringPhilosophe 05.06.2007 13:25 |
What's so complicated about it? Seems pretty easy to understand to me. Since all Valensia does is copy Queen, he is not a complex artist. Complex performer, maybe. But not a complex artist. Half of the difficulty of being an artist is coming up with new material...which this guy clearly doesn't do...he cops out and copies other art forms that blazed the trail before him. He may choose complex stuff to copy, but it's still a copy, ergo, not original. Ergo, he is merely a performer, not an artist in the true sense of the word. If he wanted to be a truly great performer, which he seems capable of being, he needs to stop copying other people's stuff and come up with new things on his own. |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.06.2007 13:46 |
Ok, now we're talking bullshit. A performer but not an artist?? WHAT AN INSULT!! Elvis never wrote a single fucking song in his life, then he is not an artist? For fuck's sake!! And I must ask, what did you listen of Valens' stuff? Did you listen to all of his 9 records plus the 2 V albums? I don't think so. So go to listen, and then come back and tell me if he always copies Queen. Can't think of a Queen song like The Polka or Thunderbolt. |
runy 05.06.2007 17:08 |
I listened to some various songs Valensia sings (queen covers including) and I must agree that his voice sounds nice in Queen songs and he has similar to Freddie's voice timbre, maybe just not that strong. But I wouldn't listen to him for his own stuff. Just didn't like the style. This is why I choose Mika. I like both his voice and music. And I like his whole album, not just a single song. |
AspiringPhilosophe 05.06.2007 18:30 |
Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Ok, now we're talking bullshit. A performer but not an artist?? WHAT AN INSULT!! Elvis never wrote a single fucking song in his life, then he is not an artist? For fuck's sake!! And I must ask, what did you listen of Valens' stuff? Did you listen to all of his 9 records plus the 2 V albums? I don't think so. So go to listen, and then come back and tell me if he always copies Queen. Can't think of a Queen song like The Polka or Thunderbolt.Yes, a performer...not an artist. Elvis wasn't one either. I realize I'll probably be flamed for saying that, but oh well. Performers are amazing, but if you can't come up with one creative song that is completely your own, no "borrowing" from anyone else, then you are merely a performer, though you may write songs. It was a stretch to say that he "always" copies Queen..."always" is a dangerous word to use. But since he has copied them in the past, then, at best he is a good performer, and a mediocre artist. Be original, for once, and come up with something original that is all your own. That's what makes a great artist. |
Matias Merçeauroix 05.06.2007 21:28 |
CMU HistoryGirl wrote:Did you just read what you wrote?Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Ok, now we're talking bullshit. A performer but not an artist?? WHAT AN INSULT!! Elvis never wrote a single fucking song in his life, then he is not an artist? For fuck's sake!! And I must ask, what did you listen of Valens' stuff? Did you listen to all of his 9 records plus the 2 V albums? I don't think so. So go to listen, and then come back and tell me if he always copies Queen. Can't think of a Queen song like The Polka or Thunderbolt.Yes, a performer...not an artist. Elvis wasn't one either. I realize I'll probably be flamed for saying that, but oh well. Performers are amazing, but if you can't come up with one creative song that is completely your own, no "borrowing" from anyone else, then you are merely a performer, though you may write songs. It was a stretch to say that he "always" copies Queen..."always" is a dangerous word to use. But since he has copied them in the past, then, at best he is a good performer, and a mediocre artist. Be original, for once, and come up with something original that is all your own. That's what makes a great artist. |
AspiringPhilosophe 06.06.2007 09:34 |
**wonders why she bothers** In the end, it is a matter of opinion. I happen to think that if you rely on other bands for your music, then you aren't an artist...merely a performer...on the same scale as cover bands. An artist by definition is something that creates something new, a performer can create things, but uses something that has been given to them, and thus creates on only a surface level. You have your opinion, I have mine. Neither is more valid than the other. Let's just leave it at that. |
john bodega 06.06.2007 13:32 |
Hmmph to all this, I'm not even going to read it. How's that for diplomacy There doesn't need to be all that much negativity in this thread because on principle alone I'd stand by any of the artists discussed. If bluegrass musicians, or jazz musicians, or whoever... all quit their jobs when they thought the genre had been pushed as far as it could be, then we wouldn't HAVE that music anymore. Music needs to be alive. Having it as a recorded legacy is not enough. It needs to continue to grow, to have things done to it.... even a cover is not a bad thing, when done creatively. While I do think Valensia sails too close to being derivative, it's something that has to be admired because he's at least trying to keep a kind of music alive. It's not *bad* music.... in my opinion it's a little too much like copying. But hell, either you like his music on it's own, or you hate it, hear someone say "that's ripping off Queen" and then go and investigate. Boom - another Queen fan. No one loses. Least of all Valensia - debate all you want about his originality, but he's actually pretty good at what he does. Fine voice. Good player. As for Mika and the Darkness.... people need not get so worked up, again. The Darkness were fine if you took them as a joke band (which I did). And Mika... well fuck. Good at what he does, and only very young... give him a chance to develop. (salutes all) |
Boy Thomas Raker 06.06.2007 15:34 |
"And Mika... well fuck. Good at what he does, and only very young... give him a chance to develop." Well put, Zebonka. I'd hazard a guess that the majority of people hear who have flamed Mika have done so because of the line "so I tried a little Freddie", and thought "Freddie clone!" Actually, the song is about the difficulty of trying to establish yourself in the bullshit world of music, and he "tried a little Freddie" because he was unsure of what he should be to people in the industry. The song is a total fuck you to the music industry, so good on him for that. I think that Mika obviously is heavily influenced by Freddie, and that shows in his playing and the affectation on his vocals, but I'm pretty sure Freddie was influenced by people like Liza Minelli and Robert Plant so it's not like Freddie was Freddie on the first Queen album. Give Mika time, he may suck, he may have a great career, but let him stand on his own without having to slam him for trying to be like someone else. |
Janet 06.06.2007 15:40 |
Boy Thomas Raker wrote: "And Mika... well fuck. Good at what he does, and only very young... give him a chance to develop." Well put, Zebonka. I'd hazard a guess that the majority of people hear who have flamed Mika have done so because of the line "so I tried a little Freddie", and thought "Freddie clone!" Actually, the song is about the difficulty of trying to establish yourself in the bullshit world of music, and he "tried a little Freddie" because he was unsure of what he should be to people in the industry. The song is a total fuck you to the music industry, so good on him for that. I think that Mika obviously is heavily influenced by Freddie, and that shows in his playing and the affectation on his vocals, but I'm pretty sure Freddie was influenced by people like Liza Minelli and Robert Plant so it's not like Freddie was Freddie on the first Queen album. Give Mika time, he may suck, he may have a great career, but let him stand on his own without having to slam him for trying to be like someone else.Agree completely! |
Matias Merçeauroix 06.06.2007 16:05 |
HE IS TALKING ABOUT FRED ASTAIRE, NOT FREDDIE FUCKING MERCURY |
Boy Thomas Raker 06.06.2007 16:16 |
I've heard both stories, Fred Astaire and Freddie Mercury, although I've never, ever heard Fred Astaire referred to as Freddie, and I'm as old as dirt. Nonetheless, in his video he does the Freddie move with the imaginary mic over his head after he sings that line. The connection is there, and he's been compared to Freddie (Mercury, not Astaire) ;)in scores of interviews. Give him time to grow and we'll see what he's made of. |
Erin 06.06.2007 17:20 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Check out Justin's myspace page.... Got 4 new tunes on there, all of them pretty darn good. linkThanks a lot, Haystacks! Now I can't get that Gay in the 80's song out of my head..;-P |
beautifulsoup 06.06.2007 22:02 |
Boy Thomas Raker wrote: I've heard both stories, Fred Astaire and Freddie Mercury, although I've never, ever heard Fred Astaire referred to as Freddie, and I'm as old as dirt. Nonetheless, in his video he does the Freddie move with the imaginary mic over his head after he sings that line. The connection is there, and he's been compared to Freddie (Mercury, not Astaire) ;)in scores of interviews. Give him time to grow and we'll see what he's made of.Thank you! |
The Fairy King 07.06.2007 03:25 |
Could be Astaire...the song is called Grace Kelly after all. |
The Fairy King 07.06.2007 03:33 |
*(azzadude)* ..GET DOWN MAKE LOVE! wrote: If Mika has said, Its Freddie Mercury............................then why would it be about any one else???????????????????????????????????Instead of posting so many question marks, you could give us the proof so we can move on. |
The Fairy King 07.06.2007 04:18 |
XD |
john bodega 07.06.2007 07:13 |
I'm afraid you're all wrong - AGAIN. He means Fred Williamson. link Boss nigger. |
Erin 07.06.2007 11:10 |
Zebonka12 wrote: He means Fred Williamson. link Boss nigger.OMG...;-D My, how times have changed! |
runy 09.06.2007 13:04 |
*(azzadude)* ..GET DOWN MAKE LOVE! wrote:It's so pleasing what he sais about Freddie in that video... :)<b><font color="#FF1493">The Fairy King wrote:???????????????????????? I quite like the questions marks......... But just for the people here who keep on saying its not freddie M, but its Fred A..... well.... watch this at 2min and 22sec and then tell me what you all think... link*(azzadude)* ..GET DOWN MAKE LOVE! wrote: If Mika has said, Its Freddie Mercury............................then why would it be about any one else???????????????????????????????????Instead of posting so many question marks, you could give us the proof so we can move on. And going along with you, there can't be Fred Astair mentioned, because of the name form mostly used: for Mercury we use Freddie and for Astair we use Fred, so why the fuck he sang Freddie instead of Fred, if he ment Astair...? LOL... |
thomasquinn 32989 10.06.2007 05:59 |
Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: Ok, now we're talking bullshit. A performer but not an artist?? WHAT AN INSULT!! Elvis never wrote a single fucking song in his life, then he is not an artist? For fuck's sake!!Nope, he was an entertainer. And I must ask, what did you listen of Valens' stuff? Did you listen to all of his 9 records plus the 2 V albums? I don't think so.She doesn't need to. One or two albums ought to be enough to get a pretty good view of an artist, especially a copy-cat pseudo-artist. So go to listen, and then come back and tell me if he always copies Queen. Can't think of a Queen song like The Polka or Thunderbolt.Wow. Two exceptions (and dubious ones at that). |
thomasquinn 32989 10.06.2007 06:02 |
Boy Thomas Raker wrote: "And Mika... well fuck. Good at what he does, and only very young... give him a chance to develop." Well put, Zebonka. I'd hazard a guess that the majority of people hear who have flamed Mika have done so because of the line "so I tried a little Freddie", and thought "Freddie clone!" Actually, the song is about the difficulty of trying to establish yourself in the bullshit world of music, and he "tried a little Freddie" because he was unsure of what he should be to people in the industry. The song is a total fuck you to the music industry, so good on him for that. I think that Mika obviously is heavily influenced by Freddie, and that shows in his playing and the affectation on his vocals, but I'm pretty sure Freddie was influenced by people like Liza Minelli and Robert Plant so it's not like Freddie was Freddie on the first Queen album. Give Mika time, he may suck, he may have a great career, but let him stand on his own without having to slam him for trying to be like someone else.The point you seem to be missing: Grace Kelly is musically a Queen-rip. Style plagiarism. In fact, also arrangement-plagiarism, but we'll leave that for now. Listen to the rest of the album next. Do you hear anything innovative? No, I didn't think so. Sure, I'll give him time, but only if HE gives ME something that is at least DECENT and at least SOMEWHAT INNOVATIVE. |
Boy Thomas Raker 10.06.2007 11:13 |
And the point you seem to be missing, Thomas, is that there was nothing on the first Queen album that separated Freddie from anyone else. If the internet were available in 1973, people on the Led Zeppelin, Sweet and Bowie forums would be bitching about how this Freddie guy has ripped off music/style/androgony from their favourite act. Queen's first couple of albums were basically passed off as warmed over Led Zeppelin with Beach Boys harmonies. It irked Freddie and he always made the point of asking interviewers who sounded like Queen when Bo Rhap was released. As to Grace Kelly ripping off Queen, can't agree. He's obviously influenced, but does anything with piano noodlings and vocal harmonies and big flourishes equal a Queen rip-off? Again, Queen were considered Led Zep clones in the beginning, and their first album was a very Zep/Free style of music. They changed, which is why I say Mika deserves time. |
Donna13 10.06.2007 11:14 |
*(azzadude)* ..GET DOWN MAKE LOVE! wrote: If Mika has said, Its Freddie Mercury............................then why would it be about any one else???????????????????????????????????If you think hard about this question, grasshoppers, you will realize that he uses Grace Kelly's entire name so there is no mistaking that he is singing about her. But ... he only uses the first name of Freddie. Hmm. Could it be Fred Astaire after all? Even if it is, it all leads back to Freddie. Let's look at the subliminal message that is missed by almost everyone: Fred Astaire used to dance with whom? That's right - Ginger Rogers. Notice her last name. Hmm. That reminds you of Roger Taylor and Paul Rodgers. Also, Ginger Rogers without Fred Astaire would not have been as big a star (Mika without Queen...). But they always ended up together in the movies (hmm, what could this mean?). This is a big hint that Mika knows he cannot be a really big star without using Queen in some way. He really sees himself as the new lead singer and co-songwriter (once Paul retires) of Queen. But he didn't want to be too obvious about it. Other options to consider: Freddie starts with an f and an r. Fruit starts with those two letters. And remember, Freddie thought he was a banana tree. Frontman. Whoa! Frustrated. Oh, my gosh! Frozen (in time). Ahhhh. |
user name 10.06.2007 11:40 |
AND Franz Ferdinand! Freddie started World War I! |
thomasquinn 32989 10.06.2007 15:22 |
Boy Thomas Raker wrote: And the point you seem to be missing, Thomas, is that there was nothing on the first Queen album that separated Freddie from anyone else. If the internet were available in 1973, people on the Led Zeppelin, Sweet and Bowie forums would be bitching about how this Freddie guy has ripped off music/style/androgony from their favourite act. Queen's first couple of albums were basically passed off as warmed over Led Zeppelin with Beach Boys harmonies. It irked Freddie and he always made the point of asking interviewers who sounded like Queen when Bo Rhap was released. As to Grace Kelly ripping off Queen, can't agree. He's obviously influenced, but does anything with piano noodlings and vocal harmonies and big flourishes equal a Queen rip-off? Again, Queen were considered Led Zep clones in the beginning, and their first album was a very Zep/Free style of music. They changed, which is why I say Mika deserves time.And when did I say that I was extremely impressed with Queen I? I'm not. It's a fair rock album, that's it. Queen II is the breakthrough work for me. If Mika pulls that off with his second record, fine. However, I cannot judge him on what he hasn't done yet, so I will, if you permit me, not share in your powers of divination and remain the mere mortal I am, thus judging Mika on his first album. That first album is nothing special. Oh, and the vocal ARRANGEMENT is a Freddie-rip. Not note-by-note plagiarism, just style-theft. And that goes considerably deeper than "random baroque harmony vocals", it continues through the chordal structure, down to the chord-tones that get stress and the type of passing notes. |
runy 10.06.2007 16:51 |
<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: AND Franz Ferdinand! Freddie started World War I!Which one did... Freddie Mercury or Fred Astair? |
Boy Thomas Raker 10.06.2007 21:01 |
Not singling you out, Thomas, re: Queen I and the rest of Queen's career. It just appears some people here are ready to crucify Mika for similiarities, or ripping off Queen. I don't see the note-for-note rip-off that you do, but I think you're knowledgeable enough that I can't dispute what your ears hear. Either he'll become less Freddie/more Mika or he won't. He has personality in his music, which is harder to find these days, so it'll be interesting to see where his career takes him. I just think too many people are all over him based on one album, which isn't a fair sample size. |
thomasquinn 32989 11.06.2007 11:30 |
Boy Thomas Raker wrote: Not singling you out, Thomas, re: Queen I and the rest of Queen's career. It just appears some people here are ready to crucify Mika for similiarities, or ripping off Queen. I don't see the note-for-note rip-off that you do, but I think you're knowledgeable enough that I can't dispute what your ears hear. Either he'll become less Freddie/more Mika or he won't. He has personality in his music, which is harder to find these days, so it'll be interesting to see where his career takes him. I just think too many people are all over him based on one album, which isn't a fair sample size.Sorry, my mistake. I'm getting so used to taking all the flack here, that it's turning into a habit to defend :) I appreciate his choice of genre, seeing how glam is still (again) a rather marginal area in popular music. However, he runs the risk of turning into a Darkness-style novelty act, unless he finds some artistic depth to base himself on. My main beef with his album is that he appears stuck on, as well as in, one very slim style. He needs to expand beyond that, and try other types of songs. If he doesn't do so on his second album, I fear him a lost case, like the Dresden Dolls, for whom I had a lot of hope after their first studio album, but who blew it with the second. |