| Ginger01 21.04.2007 03:21 |
As requested, here is the 14 April 1979 in FLAC. I got this from Wiley in the Hub (hope you don't mind me sharing it here!) and unfortunately it is not complete - God save the Queen is missing and We are the Champions fades out after about 20 seconds. Sound is really very good. Lineage : Master > DAT (x) > CDR (x) > WAV > FLAC Total size is 648 MB. No artwork, unfortunately. Disc 1: 1. Intro / We Will Rock You (fast) 2. Let Me Enteartain You 3. Somebody To Love 4. If You Can't Beat Them 5. Death On Two Legs 6. Killer Queen 7. Bicycle Race 8. I'm In Love With My Car 9. Get Down, Make love 10. You're My Best Friend 11. Now I'm Here Disc 2: 1. Don't Stop Me Now 2. Spread Your Wings 3. Dreamer's Ball 4. Love Of My Life 5. '39 6. It's Late 7. Brighton Rock / Guitar Solo 8. Keep Yourself Alive 9. Bohemian Rhapsody 10. Tie Your Mother Down 11. Sheer Heart Attack 12. We Will Rock You 13. We Are The Champions (cut) Good download and enjoy! |
| Masahiko 21.04.2007 05:33 |
Thanks Ginger! Thank you for answering my request. Doumo arigatou! |
| jacques 21.04.2007 06:14 |
Thanks! Jacques |
| on my way up 21.04.2007 07:43 |
thank you very much |
| Hippolyte 21.04.2007 08:01 |
Many thanks, Ginger. |
| Vali 21.04.2007 08:11 |
Many thanks ! |
| dogwithabone 21.04.2007 08:25 |
Thank you so much Ginger!! |
| Masahiko 21.04.2007 08:44 |
Could anyone make coverart for this please. |
| The Real Wizard 21.04.2007 10:32 |
Could someone send me a short sample of it? Or upload it to mediafire, or wherever? I can compare it to my copy, which is: Master > DAT (1) > CDR Thanks! |
| Maruga 21.04.2007 14:36 |
Thank you very much Ginger... |
| on my way up 21.04.2007 15:27 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Could someone send me a short sample of it? Or upload it to mediafire, or wherever? I can compare it to my copy, which is: Master > DAT (1) > CDR Thanks!Is your version complete? |
| Ginger01 21.04.2007 15:44 |
Here is Track 7 from Disc 1 (Bicycle Race) in Mediafire as a sample: link Bob, yours is probably better. It is no doubt also complete. Please tell me what you think. |
| The Real Wizard 21.04.2007 18:17 |
Thanks for the sample, Ginger! It is exactly the same tape generation as mine, but there seem to be some digital clicks here and there (there's a big one right at the beginning). It's probably been burned and ripped a few times... but it's still lossless. The pitch is also a half-semitone too slow, so the lineage of my copy should actually be this: Master > DAT (1) > CDR (x) > WAV > GoldWave pitch correction > CDR (0) Yours is cut at the end for some reason... strange! |
| Ginger01 21.04.2007 19:35 |
It starts with wind and thunder (covered by audience noise) and at 30 seconds WWRY fast starts. So the assumed lineage of my version would be Master > DAT (1) > CDR (x) > WAV > FLAC? Please confirm and I'll add it to the first post. Thanks for all your info! |
| The Real Wizard 22.04.2007 00:40 |
Ginger01 wrote: It starts with wind and thunder (covered by audience noise) and at 30 seconds WWRY fast starts.Yeah.. the same as mine. So the assumed lineage of my version would be Master > DAT (1) > CDR (x) > WAV > FLAC? Please confirm and I'll add it to the first post.Looks right to me! Thanks for all your info!No prob! |
| tilomagnet 22.04.2007 02:54 |
Ginger01 wrote: It starts with wind and thunder (covered by audience noise) and at 30 seconds WWRY fast starts. So the assumed lineage of my version would be Master > DAT (1) > CDR (x) > WAV > FLAC? Please confirm and I'll add it to the first post. Thanks for all your info!I'd rather say Master > DAT(x) > CDR(x) You cannot be really sure that the DAT gens of both versions are identical. The less complete version may be from a different generation of the original Master > DAT transfer. Since DAT > DAT is (when done properly) a bit-perfect digital, and therefore lossless way of copying, you cannot tell if something is higher or lower gen by ear. DAT(0) may sound identical to DAT(10). |
| The Real Wizard 22.04.2007 03:11 |
Well, I was just going by what I was told when I first got the recording. I was told: Master > DAT > DAT > CDR |
| Ginger01 22.04.2007 03:58 |
Thanks for all these clarifications! :) |
| tilomagnet 22.04.2007 04:25 |
Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Well, I was just going by what I was told when I first got the recording. I was told: Master > DAT > DAT > CDREhm, I wasn't questioning that lineage, Bob. Obviously both versions are derived from the same original Analog Master > DAT transfer, but the less complete version may have been transfered to CDR from a differently gen'ed DAT than your copy. |
| Sithmarauder 22.04.2007 10:16 |
As always, thank you Ginger. YTB |
| The Real Wizard 22.04.2007 12:52 |
tilomagnet wrote:Aha... indeed a possibility.Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: Well, I was just going by what I was told when I first got the recording. I was told: Master > DAT > DAT > CDREhm, I wasn't questioning that lineage, Bob. Obviously both versions are derived from the same original Analog Master > DAT transfer, but the less complete version may have been transfered to CDR from a differently gen'ed DAT than your copy. Dammit, why do you always have to make sense!??? ;) |
| stark 23.04.2007 04:25 |
thanks ginger! |
| fernando_sales 23.04.2007 10:32 |
Many thanks, Ginger! |
| argueteban 23.04.2007 21:39 |
would somebody keep seedin'. thank you, thank you and thank you (-; |
| pompon67 21.03.2008 04:47 |
Can I ask you for seeding this show :)? |
| Hannibal23 21.03.2008 05:39 |
Any more seeders please?!? |
| daffy_the_duck 21.03.2008 13:03 |
I don't know why I miss this one last year. Can someone help me to fix that mistake? |
| PBB 21.03.2008 15:17 |
daffy_the_duck wrote: I don't know why I miss this one last year. Can someone help me to fix that mistake?I know why I missed it: I was on holiday:-) Thank you for sharing and the reseeding:-) |
| Ginger01 21.03.2008 18:17 |
Always glad to help! Hope you complete soon (and please help seed for others!) :) |
| pompon67 24.03.2008 16:04 |
Uuuu, 0 seeds again :(, please help and seed!! :) |
| Ginger01 24.03.2008 16:38 |
Seeding again... I stopped because I saw evidence of other seeders... clearly it was not the case :( anyway, hope you complete soon! :) |
| pompon67 27.03.2008 10:14 |
Thanks for seeding, but 0 seeds again and again request for seeding please :) |
| pompon67 27.03.2008 10:15 |
Thanks for seeding, but 0 seeds again and again request for seeding please :) |
| PBB 27.03.2008 12:29 |
pompon67 wrote: Thanks for seeding, but 0 seeds again and again request for seeding please :)I've been seeding all week, but not 24/7. I don't connect to anyone. Anyway I'm not home today, so I can't help you at the moment. |
| Ginger01 27.03.2008 16:59 |
Seeding again, but don't see anybody downloading... |
| PBB 28.03.2008 04:07 |
Ginger01 wrote: Seeding again, but don't see anybody downloading...Seeding again, but only this morning. seeding someone in italy, but still don't see Pompon. Hopefully you'll get it through the other peer then:-) |