QueenZone discussion #1587118

guild93 wrote: ....and it's channel 7 who are filming and broadcasting the fire benefit concert on Sunday too

guild93 wrote: I hope Brian is ok, love andgood energy to him link

runner_70 wrote: Hope he sues the shit out of the old angry man.

vinyljack wrote: Bad day, I reckon. I think when Brian takes time to meet fans he's conscious of making sure people get their time with him, however short, and it's difficult to do that when you've got a cameraman there. Doesn't help that it's a kid he's trying to speak to so feels like even more of an infringement and he's probably sick of the press being most places they go to. It's been a good few weeks since he slept in his own bed, probably a bit jetlagged and might not be in the best mindset mental health wise. All adds up.

runner_70 wrote: The real face of May is shining thru more and more. I always said he is a two faced guy. Mr Bad Guy so to speak.

vinyljack wrote: Bad day, I reckon. I think when Brian takes time to meet fans he's conscious of making sure people get their time with him, however short, and it's difficult to do that when you've got a cameraman there. Doesn't help that it's a kid he's trying to speak to so feels like even more of an infringement . . . . .

Young Music Fan wrote:

runner_70 wrote: Hope he sues the shit out of the old angry man.

That's a horrible thing to say from a Queen fan who should know about the horrible things the press did for ALL the members. Shame on you.

runner_70 wrote: The real face of May is shining thru more and more. I always said he is a two faced guy. Mr Bad Guy so to speak.

ST17 wrote: empty bullshit.

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote: The real face of May is shining thru more and more. I always said he is a two faced guy. Mr Bad Guy so to speak.

You haven't got a clue.

Young Music Fan wrote:

runner_70 wrote: Hope he sues the shit out of the old angry man.

That's a horrible thing to say from a Queen fan who should know about the horrible things the press did for ALL the members. Shame on you.

Holly2003 wrote: Brian should've given him a red special -- a good kick in the grundle.

Mkls wrote: typical Brian on a bad day ! I have seen it many times in the last 20 years... . FFS he is on TOUR - if he doesnt want interaction then should sit back into his S500 limo!

Rick wrote:

runner_70 wrote: The real face of May is shining thru more and more. I always said he is a two faced guy. Mr Bad Guy so to speak.

I agree, unfortunately. I think his character is one of the main reasons John retired, not just because of Freddie's passing.

Saint Jiub wrote: Journalism at its finest ... oh our poor cameraman is innocent. Let's just show the tail end of the of this nonevent and make Brian look as bad as possible. Brian was clearly shielding a young boy from the paparazzi. Of course the sham media outlet won't show the minute leading up to Brian's short outburst, as that would make them look bad. Oh well, Channel 7 got its internet clicks and they are getting their blood money ... Fuck the media ... liberal or conservative ... The media is no longer about the news and is instead about producing their bias to get maximum emotional response and $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

Young Music Fan wrote: There's a longer version of this clip which shows a lot more of what actually happened. He clearly said for him to stop and he didn't.

ST16 wrote: Brian has been surrounded by cameras for over 50 years so surely this was him freaking out and in my opinion out of order. Does he not realise It is not everyday Queen (Brian & Roger) land in Brisbane so of course they are going to get noticed and they have to be polite and willing to be filmed. Brian needs to apologise and especially doing that to a fellow Queen fan is unforgivable.

YourValentine wrote: I have to agree with Mkls, I saw similar things happen with Brian over the years, too. We saw him being friendly and nice to the first few fans waiting at the backstage door and then freaking out being rude to the next ones without any provocation or bad behaviour on the fans' part. He is just a volatile character. I think it's totally okay to get angry and ask people to put away their cameras, it's not okay to call a human being a "parasite" or even to get physical. That is not okay under any circumstance.

Sebastian wrote: 100% agree with Brian here: the cameraman was repeatedly asked not to film them, and he kept doing so. Brian was right to be annoyed.

runner_70 wrote:

Sebastian wrote: 100% agree with Brian here: the cameraman was repeatedly asked not to film them, and he kept doing so. Brian was right to be annoyed.

It is one thing being annoyed. But he seems to have hit him and calling him names. I think he is an arrogant parrott for ages now and completely out of touch with the real world..... The polite mask is off finally it seems....

ST16 wrote:Brian is simply doing too much for a 72 year old man, he is spinning around the globe like a loony and the only way is disaster in the end be it depression or stress looming in the background. He needs to slow right down before its too late. Lets face it he has been touring since 2012 so its time to stop.

YourValentine wrote: it's not okay to get physical. That is not okay under any circumstance.

ST16 wrote:@Brenski Firstly i was not putting my point across as an argument because on this thread it is just a serious discussion. Age may be one thing but health wise Brian is not really a well man, he suffered that prostate scare 3 to 4 years ago and his knee operation a while back, and so with that in mind he should really stop been greedy with touring a chill out.

Iron Butterfly wrote: I'm shocked reading from another poster here that Brian told fans to f off. I'm no prude, but I doubt those fans were breaking laws, maybe they were just hoping for an autograph.

ST16 wrote:@Brenski what do you mean you have removed my comment, because you do not have the right to do such a thing on here that is out of order.

ST16 wrote:Well i think karma may be getting its own back for when Brian made Freddie look like a jerk in the film lol

ST16 wrote: Well i think karma may be getting its own back for when Brian made Freddie look like a jerk in the film lol

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote:Well i think karma may be getting its own back for when Brian made Freddie look like a jerk in the film lol

The Rhapsody Tour - 2019 USA: 19 dates Box Office - $36,000,000 293,000 of 295,000 (99.4%) sold out. (14 of 19 gigs) tell me again, what does your dictionary define "karma" as?

ST16 wrote:@ Brenski What is the point quoting me when the original is already on this page? Everyone is entitled to there own opinions so please do not play god it does not suit you sir!

ST16 wrote:blue

ST16 wrote:blue

runner_70 wrote:

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote:Well i think karma may be getting its own back for when Brian made Freddie look like a jerk in the film lol

The Rhapsody Tour - 2019 USA: 19 dates Box Office - $36,000,000 293,000 of 295,000 (99.4%) sold out. (14 of 19 gigs) tell me again, what does your dictionary define "karma" as?

What does the box office have to do with karma?

brENsKi wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote:Well i think karma may be getting its own back for when Brian made Freddie look like a jerk in the film lol

The Rhapsody Tour - 2019 USA: 19 dates Box Office - $36,000,000 293,000 of 295,000 (99.4%) sold out. (14 of 19 gigs) tell me again, what does your dictionary define "karma" as?

What does the box office have to do with karma?

well, surely if there were "karma" at work and Brian had made Freddie look a fool", then the tour would not sell, and Brian would be forced to retire...wouldn't that (in runner_70 and Gerry world) be how true karma would manifest? Fact: he didn't. there wasn't. it did. he hasn't. and YOU BOTH still hate him.

ST16 wrote:@Brenski You yourself said you hated Brian not long ago so people in glass houses lol I dont hate him i just think he has become very desperate to keep Queen on the road even if a nobody takes Freddie's place. Brian has had terrible lapses of bad taste since 1991.

miraclesteinway wrote: If he doesn't want a camera in his face, he has the right to say so. Regardless of whether he has been public property for 50 years, he is still a human being and if he gets angry at someone filming him, then he has that right. None of us own Brian May or any other member of Queen, and none of us has the right to decide how he should react to being filmed. Brian May has an off day. So what. When was the last time anyone on this forum had an off day? Probably pretty often....

e-man wrote: must be an awful part of the job of any musician who is as famous as Brian. 99,9% of the MANY stories from 1973 onwards all say the same thing; he is a very nice guy. He's not 35 years anymore. Even though he travels like a king, the road must take its toll for a man his age. Combined with being sick of having cameras shoved up your face? I understand how he, and anyone else, can lose it.

runner_70 wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote: I'm shocked reading from another poster here that Brian told fans to f off. I'm no prude, but I doubt those fans were breaking laws, maybe they were just hoping for an autograph.

Not the first time I heard this. He is a moody guy. SOmeone told me he asked about Queen during one of his solo tours and he was very unfriendly telling the guy he is not here with Queen. What a dick

runner_70 wrote:

ST16 wrote: Well i think karma may be getting its own back for when Brian made Freddie look like a jerk in the film lol

True ;)

runner_70 wrote: He made Freddie look like a fool in the movie and now he looks like a big fool himself. Got it now?

rockchic65 wrote: Brian has posted his account of the situation on insta, I've copied it here:- My Welcome to Brisbane ! First of all THANKS to so many of you folks who managed to find a way to send me supportive messages while I’ve been quietly trying to work my way through the feelings generated by the incident that happened at Brisbane Airport, just moments after I landed in Australia. No – I’m not all right. But I will be. It certainly ruined my day, and if that’s what you wanted, Channel 7, then you got it. There’s a fine line between anger and depression, and I’ve been struggling with all of that since I got ambushed and harrassed by a TV News team, fresh off the plane from New Zealand. Now, obviously I’m not a novice at this … I’ve interacted with literally thousands of news reporters, photographers and cameramen over the last 50 years. I’m not exactly known for being aggressive, even in the face of provocation, but this guy caught me unawares – one of the rudest and most disrespectful video cameramen I’ve ever encountered. As we drove out of the airport, I noticed a small group of young kids with Queen albums, waving a welcome. I find it hard to just drive by in a case like this. Yes, they could have been pesky e-bay hounds just looking to make a quick buck, but these guys looked like very genuine fans. This stuff still matters to me. So we stopped the car and I got out to sign their Queen material, and they kindly gave me gifts of typically Australian goodies. Lovely. Pressed up against the kids was a guy with a huge TV camera. I’d noticed him, obviously, but I had no idea who he was – whether he was part of the party of kids, or a third party. I just let him film for the few moments I was signing the albums. But these kids were clearly very moved by the meeting, and I felt they deserved to have a few moments NOT being filmed for public sharing. So, in the nicest possible way, I turned to the cameraman and asked if he’d stop filming, now he’d got his story, and give us some private moments. He refused. He kept on filming, and aggressively turned the camera close-up on my face. That, to me, felt like deliberate invasion of my space, and downright unfriendly. At that moment, everything changed. (To be cont’d). Bri (Continuing from previous post) I asked the cameraman at least two more times to put the camera down, and so did the kids. One of them said “I’ve waited half my life to meet Brian and I don’t want it to be spoilt by you”. The guy carried on filming, and then I told him firmly to put the camera away, or else this would turn into an ugly incident. Finally, he pointed the camera upwards, and it was fairly obvious it was still turned on, recording sound. Now it takes quite a lot to get me rattled, but I was beginning to boil. Everyone has a tipping point, I think ? I carried on talking to the kids, trying to ignore the invasive presence, but he then pulled out his iPhone and began to film us with that. That was the final straw for me. I headed towards him with the intention of temporarily separating him from his phone, and actually put a hand on it, before my security guy gently dissuaded me. And then I realised I had walked straight into a trap. The guy now had what he wanted. He could cook this up into a story in which I was portrayed as an attacker on an innocent victim of a newsman. He possessed the only footage of the incident, so he or his bosses could edit it any way they wanted, to make me look like I lost my rag for no reason. And that, predictably, is exactly what Channel 7 did. They could have run a story about how we’d come over preparing to do our bit for Fire Fight Australia next week, or about the upcoming massively sold-out show in Brisbane, or even about how we’d had a nice welcome from some fans at the airport. But no … they ran the ‘story’ with a smug introduction about Brian May “attacking” a cameraman, followed by a cunningly edited version of the footage he’d shot, in which I come across as an aggressor. I regret getting angry, but angry I was, under what I regard as severe provocation, and to me the behaviour of the camera guy and the Channel 7 News Team is shabby and shameful. I’d like an apology from them all, but of course the chances of that are small. I don’t know whether it was all a set-up from the beginning – maybe so – or whether he just deliberately acted like an arse to create a story, but either way ... (Continued from previous post) ...but either way, I’ve had a struggle not to feel abused and unwelcome. I’m sensible enough to know the vast majority of folks here are not in any way like this. I spent the afternoon today with my cousins, naturalised Aussies for the last 45 years, and felt massive warmth. And lots of you figured out how shitty I must be feeling and reached out to me … I’m eternally grateful. I’ve always loved Queensland, and that will never change … had some of the best times of my life on the Barrier Reef, and cried buckets seeing the tragedy of the Koalas and Kangaroos in the recent fires. Tonight I still feel bruised, but finally being able to write this is a kind of therapy. I had to make my side of the story known. Being disrespected so publicly takes a little while to get over. But now it’s over. And tomorrow morning I will get up and do my preparations, with intent to give one of the best performances of my life, fuelled by new lessons learned, and a determination to make the best out of all this. And a detrmination to give our wonderful fans in Brisbane the best night of their lives !!! See ya there ! Bri P.S. I’m in touch with Cooper Simmons, the young lad you see in the photo. Both he and his parents have been very supportive, and highly critical of Channel 7’s behaviour. But I haven’t been able to trace the other fans … send me message if your read this, guys.

The Real Wizard wrote:

runner_70 wrote: He made Freddie look like a fool in the movie and now he looks like a big fool himself. Got it now?

No, because you are the fool here. Brian May is a not a Hollywood writer. You clearly do not understand the process of how scripts are done, and who is involved, and when. You are just making things up to justify your hatred for Brian May. You say you don't hate him, which is absolute nonsense. You have dedicated years of your life to relentlessly slandering him online, and you just can't pass up any opportunity to repeat your same talking points over and over again. It's clearly an addiction for you. You may have lost the plot, but it doesn't mean people with even a cursory understanding of your activities have as well. Despite your efforts, Queen - even in this incarnation - remain one of the biggest touring acts in the world. You are a waste of sperm.

The Real Wizard wrote:

rockchic65 wrote: Brian has posted his account of the situation on insta, I've copied it here:- My Welcome to Brisbane ! First of all THANKS to so many of you folks who managed to find a way to send me supportive messages while I’ve been quietly trying to work my way through the feelings generated by the incident that happened at Brisbane Airport, just moments after I landed in Australia. No – I’m not all right. But I will be. It certainly ruined my day, and if that’s what you wanted, Channel 7, then you got it. There’s a fine line between anger and depression, and I’ve been struggling with all of that since I got ambushed and harrassed by a TV News team, fresh off the plane from New Zealand. Now, obviously I’m not a novice at this … I’ve interacted with literally thousands of news reporters, photographers and cameramen over the last 50 years. I’m not exactly known for being aggressive, even in the face of provocation, but this guy caught me unawares – one of the rudest and most disrespectful video cameramen I’ve ever encountered. As we drove out of the airport, I noticed a small group of young kids with Queen albums, waving a welcome. I find it hard to just drive by in a case like this. Yes, they could have been pesky e-bay hounds just looking to make a quick buck, but these guys looked like very genuine fans. This stuff still matters to me. So we stopped the car and I got out to sign their Queen material, and they kindly gave me gifts of typically Australian goodies. Lovely. Pressed up against the kids was a guy with a huge TV camera. I’d noticed him, obviously, but I had no idea who he was – whether he was part of the party of kids, or a third party. I just let him film for the few moments I was signing the albums. But these kids were clearly very moved by the meeting, and I felt they deserved to have a few moments NOT being filmed for public sharing. So, in the nicest possible way, I turned to the cameraman and asked if he’d stop filming, now he’d got his story, and give us some private moments. He refused. He kept on filming, and aggressively turned the camera close-up on my face. That, to me, felt like deliberate invasion of my space, and downright unfriendly. At that moment, everything changed. (To be cont’d). Bri (Continuing from previous post) I asked the cameraman at least two more times to put the camera down, and so did the kids. One of them said “I’ve waited half my life to meet Brian and I don’t want it to be spoilt by you”. The guy carried on filming, and then I told him firmly to put the camera away, or else this would turn into an ugly incident. Finally, he pointed the camera upwards, and it was fairly obvious it was still turned on, recording sound. Now it takes quite a lot to get me rattled, but I was beginning to boil. Everyone has a tipping point, I think ? I carried on talking to the kids, trying to ignore the invasive presence, but he then pulled out his iPhone and began to film us with that. That was the final straw for me. I headed towards him with the intention of temporarily separating him from his phone, and actually put a hand on it, before my security guy gently dissuaded me. And then I realised I had walked straight into a trap. The guy now had what he wanted. He could cook this up into a story in which I was portrayed as an attacker on an innocent victim of a newsman. He possessed the only footage of the incident, so he or his bosses could edit it any way they wanted, to make me look like I lost my rag for no reason. And that, predictably, is exactly what Channel 7 did. They could have run a story about how we’d come over preparing to do our bit for Fire Fight Australia next week, or about the upcoming massively sold-out show in Brisbane, or even about how we’d had a nice welcome from some fans at the airport. But no … they ran the ‘story’ with a smug introduction about Brian May “attacking” a cameraman, followed by a cunningly edited version of the footage he’d shot, in which I come across as an aggressor. I regret getting angry, but angry I was, under what I regard as severe provocation, and to me the behaviour of the camera guy and the Channel 7 News Team is shabby and shameful. I’d like an apology from them all, but of course the chances of that are small. I don’t know whether it was all a set-up from the beginning – maybe so – or whether he just deliberately acted like an arse to create a story, but either way ... (Continued from previous post) ...but either way, I’ve had a struggle not to feel abused and unwelcome. I’m sensible enough to know the vast majority of folks here are not in any way like this. I spent the afternoon today with my cousins, naturalised Aussies for the last 45 years, and felt massive warmth. And lots of you figured out how shitty I must be feeling and reached out to me … I’m eternally grateful. I’ve always loved Queensland, and that will never change … had some of the best times of my life on the Barrier Reef, and cried buckets seeing the tragedy of the Koalas and Kangaroos in the recent fires. Tonight I still feel bruised, but finally being able to write this is a kind of therapy. I had to make my side of the story known. Being disrespected so publicly takes a little while to get over. But now it’s over. And tomorrow morning I will get up and do my preparations, with intent to give one of the best performances of my life, fuelled by new lessons learned, and a determination to make the best out of all this. And a detrmination to give our wonderful fans in Brisbane the best night of their lives !!! See ya there ! Bri P.S. I’m in touch with Cooper Simmons, the young lad you see in the photo. Both he and his parents have been very supportive, and highly critical of Channel 7’s behaviour. But I haven’t been able to trace the other fans … send me message if your read this, guys.

Thank you for pasting that here. Anyone who reads this and still thinks Brian was out of line has zero hope of exhibiting a shred of empathy or understanding in their lives.

ST16 wrote: Sorry i am not such a sad person that i have to search through all the posts to prove a point. Quite frankly i am not bothered or petty to quote anyone on here i have a life sweetie.

ST16 wrote:Sorry i am not such a sad person that i have to search through all the posts to prove a point. Quite frankly i am not bothered or petty to quote anyone on here i have a life sweetie.

ST16 wrote: @Brenski what do you mean you have removed my comment, because you do not have the right to do such a thing on here that is out of order. @ Brenski What is the point quoting me when the original is already on this page?

rockchic65 wrote: Brian has posted his account of the situation on insta, I've copied it here:- My Welcome to Brisbane ! First of all THANKS to so many of you folks who managed to find a way to send me supportive messages while I’ve been quietly trying to work my way through the feelings generated by the incident that happened at Brisbane Airport, just moments after I landed in Australia. No – I’m not all right. But I will be. It certainly ruined my day, and if that’s what you wanted, Channel 7, then you got it. There’s a fine line between anger and depression, and I’ve been struggling with all of that since I got ambushed and harrassed by a TV News team, fresh off the plane from New Zealand. Now, obviously I’m not a novice at this … I’ve interacted with literally thousands of news reporters, photographers and cameramen over the last 50 years. I’m not exactly known for being aggressive, even in the face of provocation, but this guy caught me unawares – one of the rudest and most disrespectful video cameramen I’ve ever encountered. As we drove out of the airport, I noticed a small group of young kids with Queen albums, waving a welcome. I find it hard to just drive by in a case like this. Yes, they could have been pesky e-bay hounds just looking to make a quick buck, but these guys looked like very genuine fans. This stuff still matters to me. So we stopped the car and I got out to sign their Queen material, and they kindly gave me gifts of typically Australian goodies. Lovely. Pressed up against the kids was a guy with a huge TV camera. I’d noticed him, obviously, but I had no idea who he was – whether he was part of the party of kids, or a third party. I just let him film for the few moments I was signing the albums. But these kids were clearly very moved by the meeting, and I felt they deserved to have a few moments NOT being filmed for public sharing. So, in the nicest possible way, I turned to the cameraman and asked if he’d stop filming, now he’d got his story, and give us some private moments. He refused. He kept on filming, and aggressively turned the camera close-up on my face. That, to me, felt like deliberate invasion of my space, and downright unfriendly. At that moment, everything changed. (To be cont’d). Bri (Continuing from previous post) I asked the cameraman at least two more times to put the camera down, and so did the kids. One of them said “I’ve waited half my life to meet Brian and I don’t want it to be spoilt by you”. The guy carried on filming, and then I told him firmly to put the camera away, or else this would turn into an ugly incident. Finally, he pointed the camera upwards, and it was fairly obvious it was still turned on, recording sound. Now it takes quite a lot to get me rattled, but I was beginning to boil. Everyone has a tipping point, I think ? I carried on talking to the kids, trying to ignore the invasive presence, but he then pulled out his iPhone and began to film us with that. That was the final straw for me. I headed towards him with the intention of temporarily separating him from his phone, and actually put a hand on it, before my security guy gently dissuaded me. And then I realised I had walked straight into a trap. The guy now had what he wanted. He could cook this up into a story in which I was portrayed as an attacker on an innocent victim of a newsman. He possessed the only footage of the incident, so he or his bosses could edit it any way they wanted, to make me look like I lost my rag for no reason. And that, predictably, is exactly what Channel 7 did. They could have run a story about how we’d come over preparing to do our bit for Fire Fight Australia next week, or about the upcoming massively sold-out show in Brisbane, or even about how we’d had a nice welcome from some fans at the airport. But no … they ran the ‘story’ with a smug introduction about Brian May “attacking” a cameraman, followed by a cunningly edited version of the footage he’d shot, in which I come across as an aggressor. I regret getting angry, but angry I was, under what I regard as severe provocation, and to me the behaviour of the camera guy and the Channel 7 News Team is shabby and shameful. I’d like an apology from them all, but of course the chances of that are small. I don’t know whether it was all a set-up from the beginning – maybe so – or whether he just deliberately acted like an arse to create a story, but either way ... (Continued from previous post) ...but either way, I’ve had a struggle not to feel abused and unwelcome. I’m sensible enough to know the vast majority of folks here are not in any way like this. I spent the afternoon today with my cousins, naturalised Aussies for the last 45 years, and felt massive warmth. And lots of you figured out how shitty I must be feeling and reached out to me … I’m eternally grateful. I’ve always loved Queensland, and that will never change … had some of the best times of my life on the Barrier Reef, and cried buckets seeing the tragedy of the Koalas and Kangaroos in the recent fires. Tonight I still feel bruised, but finally being able to write this is a kind of therapy. I had to make my side of the story known. Being disrespected so publicly takes a little while to get over. But now it’s over. And tomorrow morning I will get up and do my preparations, with intent to give one of the best performances of my life, fuelled by new lessons learned, and a determination to make the best out of all this. And a detrmination to give our wonderful fans in Brisbane the best night of their lives !!! See ya there ! Bri P.S. I’m in touch with Cooper Simmons, the young lad you see in the photo. Both he and his parents have been very supportive, and highly critical of Channel 7’s behaviour. But I haven’t been able to trace the other fans … send me message if your read this, guys.

ST16 wrote: @Real Wizzard / Brenski Are you going to slag Brian because he made a spelling mistake here : Channel 7’s behaviour. But I haven’t been able to trace the other fans … send me message if your read this, guys. Thanks for this rockchic. Should say " Send me message if YOU read this guys" !

Dougie 4 wrote: Kicked him in the head??? Are you a violent psychopath?

Thistle wrote: Now, regarding the people who have seen Brian be nice one day and a bastard the next - why are you trying to meet him so much? Once you've met him, you've met him. I met him once in 2011, and I don't feel the need to hound him for another meeting. I'd get pissed seeing the same people wanting something from me on a regular basis. How many autographs and photos do you need?

runner_70 wrote: May is ridiculous enough these days. Is there any rockstar on the planet that went down the toilet like him? From a respected artist to a laughing stock. Freddie protected him more than he deserved in the active Queen days it seems

YourValentine wrote:

Thistle wrote: Now, regarding the people who have seen Brian be nice one day and a bastard the next - why are you trying to meet him so much? Once you've met him, you've met him. I met him once in 2011, and I don't feel the need to hound him for another meeting. I'd get pissed seeing the same people wanting something from me on a regular basis. How many autographs and photos do you need?

James, you do not need to "want" something from Brian to see him in the backstage door area, it's usually the area where I meet my friends after the concert. I am NOT someone to try and pose for a stupid selfie and then post it on facebook or such, I really resent this idea. I have been only a witness to Brian's behaviour (which is usually top) in public space. I never wait for an artist at his hotel, chase his car, go to the airport or anything like that. The backstage door is the place where fans wait for the artist before or after a concert and if they are lucky, they get an autograph or selfie, if they are unlucky they don't get what they want, it's the name of the game. Most artists and most fans have no problem with that arrangement. When Brian loses his temper in this environment it's not the fans who are to blame.

ST16 wrote: @Real Wizzard / Brenski Are you going to slag Brian because he made a spelling mistake here : Channel 7’s behaviour. But I haven’t been able to trace the other fans … send me message if your read this, guys. Thanks for this rockchic. Should say " Send me message if YOU read this guys" !

Thistle wrote:

YourValentine wrote:

Thistle wrote: Now, regarding the people who have seen Brian be nice one day and a bastard the next - why are you trying to meet him so much? Once you've met him, you've met him. I met him once in 2011, and I don't feel the need to hound him for another meeting. I'd get pissed seeing the same people wanting something from me on a regular basis. How many autographs and photos do you need?

James, you do not need to "want" something from Brian to see him in the backstage door area, it's usually the area where I meet my friends after the concert. I am NOT someone to try and pose for a stupid selfie and then post it on facebook or such, I really resent this idea. I have been only a witness to Brian's behaviour (which is usually top) in public space. I never wait for an artist at his hotel, chase his car, go to the airport or anything like that. The backstage door is the place where fans wait for the artist before or after a concert and if they are lucky, they get an autograph or selfie, if they are unlucky they don't get what they want, it's the name of the game. Most artists and most fans have no problem with that arrangement. When Brian loses his temper in this environment it's not the fans who are to blame.

That's fair Barbara, but there are people who do turn up for more and more meetings, more and more selfies and more and more autographs, and the question really is aimed at them. I personally would hate seeing the same faces looking for something at every opportunity. I know people (really close pals) who do it, and I really don't understand it. I've asked them several times what they get out of it.

splicksplack wrote: It appears that the only thing that the cameraman did was film BM when BM asked him not to. It goes with the territory. If it upsets him then he can comfort himself in the knowledge of what else fame and fortune has brought. The camerman was some distance away from him when BM said “You put it down now or something ugly happens. Do you understand?” I studied law and, although I am not sure about Australian law, in the UK to say the above would be regarded as ‘a threat of impending violence” (whether by BM, his security or some other means). It is the criminal act of assault under Section 39 of the CJA 1988 (if extended to an actual physical attack it would also be battery). If tried, punishable by a max of 6 months imprisonment. It is clear that there is no defence available, (i.e. no self defence etc) (A quick Google confirms that in Australia 'common assault is usually proved when an argument with another individual was accompanied by threats’.) I’m sure Mr. Beach could advise although I suspect Contract law is his speciality. BM is a world famous celebrity and the cameraman was just doing his job. BM had absolutely no right to threaten him and he owes him an apology.

runner_70 wrote: Nothing invented. An ex legend hitting a camera guy doing his job. End of discussion. . . . . . . . . .and hitting cameramen. Nice....

k-m wrote:

splicksplack wrote: It appears that the only thing that the cameraman did was film BM when BM asked him not to. It goes with the territory. If it upsets him then he can comfort himself in the knowledge of what else fame and fortune has brought. The camerman was some distance away from him when BM said “You put it down now or something ugly happens. Do you understand?” I studied law and, although I am not sure about Australian law, in the UK to say the above would be regarded as ‘a threat of impending violence” (whether by BM, his security or some other means). It is the criminal act of assault under Section 39 of the CJA 1988 (if extended to an actual physical attack it would also be battery). If tried, punishable by a max of 6 months imprisonment. It is clear that there is no defence available, (i.e. no self defence etc) (A quick Google confirms that in Australia 'common assault is usually proved when an argument with another individual was accompanied by threats’.) I’m sure Mr. Beach could advise although I suspect Contract law is his speciality. BM is a world famous celebrity and the cameraman was just doing his job. BM had absolutely no right to threaten him and he owes him an apology.

Well, I wouldn't want to end up with you representing me if you think "it's clear there is no defence". Did you read Brian said afterwards he has been struggling with depression recently? I suspect he doesn't have a criminal record either and the matter would probably end up in Justice of the Peace Court if the police were stupid enough to report it in the first place. He'd end up with an alternative to prosecution probably, considering his huge contribution otherwise on other levels. 6 months imprisonment, what on earth are you talking about... Judges see worse every day in the courtroom actually. And finally, no Brian doesn't owe him anything. He clearly asked him many times to stop, he didn't. If anything, Brian might have pointed to a loophole in the law.

splicksplack wrote: k-m... I'm not a barrister so I couldn't represent you or anyone else. I'm just stating the law as it stands. >> I understand. You speak from a position of authority then... Cool. Depression is not a legal defence against assault. The law is the law and not what you may think is fair or common sense. There is an 'Insanity"defence but episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act would have to be proven. I very much doubt that would be possible when he appears to be carrying on with the rest of his life and a very demanding job. >> Depression may not be a "legal defence", however, it may be a mitigation and is brought up very often by lawyers. Charges are based on the whether the potential defendant (BM) would be found guilty, not on whether he has previous convictions. Otherwise no-one would ever get charged in the first place. >> This is utter nonsense. I was referring to sentencing, not to pressing charges. You studied law and you didn't get it?? Lack of previous convictions is another mitigation and would be taken into account before passing sentence. Brian could argue he is a person of good character (a rather solid case at his age of 72 and not getting into trouble ever before) and it's not in the public interest to prosecute. In this case there is clear video evidence of BM's assault on the cameraman. He is seen and heard making the threat which is a criminal act. The fact he asked the cameraman to stop filming does not give BM the right to commit a crime. 'Justice Of The Peace Courts' only exist in Scotland (where they can pass custodial sentences if required). >> There are ASSAULTS and there are "assaults". This was obviously the lowest of the low on the scale of seriousness, he barely put his phone down. Whatever the courts are in England, this would be dealt with at the lowest possible level (if it went to court, of course). You say "6 months imprisonment, what on earth are you talking about". If you read again what I said I merely pointed out that the maximum sentence for assault is 6 months (not what BM would get if tried). This was to show how serious the law regards assault. And of course "Judges see worse every day in the courtroom" but that does not negate lesser crimes. >> As above. You repeat words like "crime", "assault" and make references to imprisonment, like Brian actually punched anyone to a pulp. Contrary to what you seem to think, judges have common sense too. You also say "if the police were stupid enough to report it in the first place'. It is the cameraman who would report it. To the police. And then based on the evidence the police would ask the cameraman if he wants to press charges. That is the cameraman's decision, not the police. It's then up to the prosecutor based on the (clear) evidence. >> And who reports crimes to the Prosecutor? The police, right? Average Joe cannot go to the prosecutor's office and say, "Ooh, this awful Brian May assaulted, let's bring a case against him". The police do not have an obligation to report everything to the prosecutor. Finally you say "Brian might have pointed to a loophole in the law". Please elaborate because filming a celebrity in public for a few minutes, especially when he is in his celebrity role (signing autographs), is not an offence. >> I am not an expert on this, but I was referring to the fact the cameraman was initially using his camera and then switched to a mobile phone as if he was making a private recording at this stage. I am not sure if you can film people like Brian even if they ask you not to do it, just because they are a celebrity. But assault is.

splicksplack wrote: It appears that the only thing that the cameraman did was film BM when BM asked him not to. It goes with the territory. If it upsets him then he can comfort himself in the knowledge of what else fame and fortune has brought. The camerman was some distance away from him when BM said “You put it down now or something ugly happens. Do you understand?” I studied law and, although I am not sure about Australian law, in the UK to say the above would be regarded as ‘a threat of impending violence” (whether by BM, his security or some other means). It is the criminal act of assault under Section 39 of the CJA 1988 (if extended to an actual physical attack it would also be battery). If tried, punishable by a max of 6 months imprisonment. It is clear that there is no defence available, (i.e. no self defence etc) (A quick Google confirms that in Australia 'common assault is usually proved when an argument with another individual was accompanied by threats’.) I’m sure Mr. Beach could advise although I suspect Contract law is his speciality. BM is a world famous celebrity and the cameraman was just doing his job. BM had absolutely no right to threaten him and he owes him an apology.

Biggest Band On The Planet wrote: Its hilarious seeing Brian act the hard man.

ST16 wrote: @Siant Jiub That was not my bad grammar i provided it was actually Brian May's statement that i quoted ! So are you going to tell Brian he is also uneducated then?

runner_70 wrote:

splicksplack wrote: It appears that the only thing that the cameraman did was film BM when BM asked him not to. It goes with the territory. If it upsets him then he can comfort himself in the knowledge of what else fame and fortune has brought. The camerman was some distance away from him when BM said “You put it down now or something ugly happens. Do you understand?” I studied law and, although I am not sure about Australian law, in the UK to say the above would be regarded as ‘a threat of impending violence” (whether by BM, his security or some other means). It is the criminal act of assault under Section 39 of the CJA 1988 (if extended to an actual physical attack it would also be battery). If tried, punishable by a max of 6 months imprisonment. It is clear that there is no defence available, (i.e. no self defence etc) (A quick Google confirms that in Australia 'common assault is usually proved when an argument with another individual was accompanied by threats’.) I’m sure Mr. Beach could advise although I suspect Contract law is his speciality. BM is a world famous celebrity and the cameraman was just doing his job. BM had absolutely no right to threaten him and he owes him an apology.

He should sue him :) At least some voice of reason on here......MAy and his sheep will disagree though :)

aristide1 wrote: You miss the whole point of this incident - it's about the shabby personality of Brian. He is not an innocent caught in this game of public exposure, his whole life was dedicated to gain more fame, more money, more recognition (even in nonadjacent fields). Now he demands privacy. It's impossible and ludicrous, especially if the action takes place on the sidewalk.

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

splicksplack wrote: It appears that the only thing that the cameraman did was film BM when BM asked him not to. It goes with the territory. If it upsets him then he can comfort himself in the knowledge of what else fame and fortune has brought. The camerman was some distance away from him when BM said “You put it down now or something ugly happens. Do you understand?” I studied law and, although I am not sure about Australian law, in the UK to say the above would be regarded as ‘a threat of impending violence” (whether by BM, his security or some other means). It is the criminal act of assault under Section 39 of the CJA 1988 (if extended to an actual physical attack it would also be battery). If tried, punishable by a max of 6 months imprisonment. It is clear that there is no defence available, (i.e. no self defence etc) (A quick Google confirms that in Australia 'common assault is usually proved when an argument with another individual was accompanied by threats’.) I’m sure Mr. Beach could advise although I suspect Contract law is his speciality. BM is a world famous celebrity and the cameraman was just doing his job. BM had absolutely no right to threaten him and he owes him an apology.

He should sue him :) At least some voice of reason on here......MAy and his sheep will disagree though :)

You're both talking crap. Calling someone a parasite, telling them to go away and saying somethings ugly is going to happen are not direct threats of violence. Brian asked the guy to stop filming after he ad filmed for a few minutes. He did that media thing where they say ok but carry on. Brian wanted some private time with the fans, not an unreadable request and one that the fans appear to have backed. Brian made a grab for the phone. He didn't hit the guy, he didn't cause any damage and he didn't make any slanderous comments, unlike half of runner_70's posts. So what exactly are you expecting Brian to be sued for. The other telling thing is channel 7 ran the edited version of the footage but have said and done nothing about runner_70's alleged assault or splicksplack's insightful reading of Australian common law. Splicksplack you studied law, good for you. I learnt to fly, it doesn't mean I can fly a Typhoon euro fighter any more than you seem to be able to talk much more sense than rocker boy Weckwerth_70

Vocal harmony wrote:

aristide1 wrote: You miss the whole point of this incident - it's about the shabby personality of Brian. He is not an innocent caught in this game of public exposure, his whole life was dedicated to gain more fame, more money, more recognition (even in nonadjacent fields). Now he demands privacy. It's impossible and ludicrous, especially if the action takes place on the sidewalk.

Absolutely, if you look at the encounter from that point of view. However if you read Brian's account of the situation he was thinking I the fans and those fans and their parents are very much on Brian's side. The fact the camera man was asked and agreed to stop filming but then carried on was the problem here, not the fact that he had filmed something, but the fact he wasn't willing to allow Brian and the fans, some of who apparently were young, a few minutes away from media glare. The press/media should accept bounderies, if they don't or you are not willing to accept that you end up with the situation Freddie had around his house, I know this is extreme in comparison, where the press can do what they want regardless of personal feelings. The facts still stand the guy got a few minutes of footage he was asked politely to stop and give the fans and Brian a few minutes but basically had the attitude of fuck you I'm going to carry on.

Holly2003 wrote: The amount of attention-seeking stupidity on this forum is at an all-time high.

aristide1 wrote: Like the father (of) a Down syndrome child, I love him, but I'm also very disappointed.

Holly2003 wrote: I was wondering which idiot would be the first to bite and you didn't disappoint.

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: Brian should've given him a red special -- a good kick in the grundle.

ha ! You win the internet for today.

aristide1 wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: blue

[color=red]Indeed, replying to someone you don't like on another thread is the absolute attention-seeking stupidity on this forum. It's only a preview of your devastating syllables you prepare for me on your own thread, right?I'm eagerly waiting.[/color]

aristide1 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: Brian should've given him a red special -- a good kick in the grundle.

ha ! You win the internet for today.

Why do you feel the urge to gratify the author of "I was wondering which idiot would be the first to bite and you didn't disappoint"?

aristide1 wrote:Your position in the staff of this exclusive Queen club is secured anyway (as a Brian May fan, and as a Brian Boru descendant),.

aristide1 wrote:while I have to sneak through the backdoor entry together with the delivery boys.

aristide1 wrote:It's increasingly harder for me to beat your coalition against logic and common sense.

ST16 wrote:Brenski I see you are still ranting on here and blaming everyone else but yourself. Time to play nice as you keep telling me so just do it! lol

aristide1 wrote: I hope your prompt (7 min. - impressive) "Heil Bob" will be rightfully appreciated by the party leader, Brenski. Your position in the staff of this exclusive Queen club is secured anyway (as a Brian May fan, and as a Brian Boru descendant), while I have to sneak through the backdoor entry together with the delivery boys. It's increasingly harder for me to beat your coalition against logic and common sense.

ST16 wrote:Brenski party leader and chief whip Real Wizard ha ha ha no wonder this site is fucked up!

ST16 wrote:Poor Brenski you are at a cross roads in your life, but don't know which way to go? Take time out get plenty of beef tea to your lips and don't touch salmon ! lol

Saint Jiub wrote: Gerry, runner, and SC - the 3 Stooges of trolls.

mike hunt wrote:

Saint Jiub wrote: Gerry, runner, and SC - the 3 Stooges of trolls.

Are they the same person?

mike hunt wrote: Gerry and Runner I think are the same person with 2 accounts.

AlbaNo1 wrote:Is this what happens when you win the internet for the day

AlbaNo1 wrote:Bully boy manchild Brenski, you delivered several disgusting insults to me on another thread which was in fact the only thread I had clashed with you. You chose to jump in. I reply back on the same conversation but you quickly throw out your stupid stalker icons. I checked to see if what you said was in any way illegal but it seems it's not. So you have an enemy now you obnoxious liar. Loving your "who me " response as another poster observed your destructive tendencies. Get some self perspective you pompous self deluded clown. If I did have time I'd put some time to analyse the number of your posts which offer constructive comments on music versus argumentative remarks with the same posters . You absolute tool.

AlbaNo1 (Posted:18 Feb 20, 15:04) wrote:[color=blue]now go and fight someone else imbecile Only with you , you clown I haven't fought with anyone else. I wonder how many posts in this public forum you have branded people idiots or imbeciles "Idiot" would be an interesting search word to enter. Wonder which poster that would show up under. You don't say that to people in person but here it's ok right. [/color]

splicksplack wrote: Sorry to reply like this 9WITH CAPS) but the 'reply with post' thing seems to be playing up. So... Vocal Harmony, your post... "You're both talking crap. Calling someone a parasite, telling them to go away and saying somethings ugly is going to happen are not direct threats of violence. UNFORTUNATELY, THAT IS NOT YOUR CALL. IT IS THE PERCEPTION OF THE PERSON IT IS ADDRESSED TO. TO BE THREATENED WITH 'SOMETHING UGLY'S GOING TO HAPPEN' IN THE MANNER BM SAID IT IS BY ANYONE'S STANDARDS A THREAT OF VIOLENCE. DON'T KID YOURSELF Brian asked the guy to stop filming after he ad filmed for a few minutes. He did that media thing where they say ok but carry on. Brian wanted some private time with the fans, not an unreadable request and one that the fans appear to have backed. SO WHAT? IT DOES NOT GIVE BM THE RIGHT TO THREATEN (I.E. TAKE THE LAW INTO HIS OWN HANDS). IF I COME HOME AND SOMEONE HAS PARKED IN MY DRIVE I CAN REQUEST THEY MOVE THEIR CAR BUT I HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY "MOVE YOUR CAR OR THINGS WILL GET UGLY'. THAT WOULD OBVIOUSLY BE A THREAT OF VIOLENCE. Brian made a grab for the phone. He didn't hit the guy, he didn't cause any damage and he didn't make any slanderous comments, unlike half of runner_70's posts. So what exactly are you expecting Brian to be sued for. I HAVEN'T MENTIONED 'SUEING', 'HITTING', 'CRIMINAL DAMAGE' OR 'SLANDER'. WHAT I HAVE DONE IS POINT OUT THAT BRIAN COULD BE PROSECUTED FOR ASSAULT UNDER SECTION 39 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT. ASSAULT IS THE THREAT OF VIOLENCE, NOT THE ACT (WHICH WOULD BE BATTERY). The other telling thing is channel 7 ran the edited version of the footage but have said and done nothing about runner_70's alleged assault or splicksplack's insightful reading of Australian common law. NOT SURE YOUR POINT HERE. ALL THAT IS RELEVANT IS THAT VIDEO EVIDENCE EXISTS OF BM THREATENING THE CAMERAMAN. Splicksplack you studied law, good for you. I learnt to fly, it doesn't mean I can fly a Typhoon euro fighter any more than you seem to be able to talk much more sense than rocker boy Weckwerth_70 I WOULD IMAGINE FLYING A TYPHOON FIGHTER IS HIGHLY SKILLED SO NOT A VERY GOOD COMPARISON. ALL YOU NEED TO DO TO UNDERSTAND SECTION 39 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT IS THE ABILITY TO READ. WHICH MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO BEFORE FIRING OFF ANYMORE HYSTERICAL ARSE-LICKING POSTS.

GratefulFan wrote: So he's a twat a lot of the time, but a well-intended human basically all of the time.

GratefulFan wrote: Brian is frequently intemperate and narcissistic, and has piss poor self-awareness. But the only reason we know that to such a certainty is because he has such a genuine desire to use his platform and privilege meaningfully - to affect social change for the good, as he sees it, and to have real exchanges with real fans, as he sees them. So he's a twat a lot of the time, but a well-intended human basically all of the time.

Thistle wrote:

GratefulFan wrote: So he's a twat a lot of the time, but a well-intended human basically all of the time.

Oh-ah, cha-cha-cha - you said twat lol.

dudeofqueen wrote: More proof of his narcissistic demeanour: A friend of mine if physio for the England Women's cricket team currently in Pert for the Women's T20 Cricket World Cup. The team were in the gym and had a Queen play list going and the girls were all singing during their training session. In to the guym walks Brian May who insisted that the music be turned off or, at the very least, down because "I don't want to hear it!" What an absolute fucking idiot.

GratefulFan wrote: No I did not! I spelled tawt wrong. Plus I only said twat because Vocal Harmony said it next.

Vocal harmony wrote: Yes Brian didn't want to listen to it, he's in the middle of a tour playing the music, his time away from Queen is his own. How many artists really want to listen to them selves all the time.

Holly2003 wrote: Not what it says here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/51607607

GratefulFan wrote: I blame the front desk for this needless debacle, who when asked what Brian could expect to hear in the gym, replied “Crickets”.

dudeofqueen wrote: Vocal harmony, re: >all the time All the time? He's the one that's flogging Queen music to every advert that pops the question. He's the one agreeing to GH re-issues every 9 months or so. He's the one fronting publicity for a fictitious movie about the band that has reached a global audience. Then he has the temerity to go in to a hotel gym and demand that a group of elite athletes turn Queen music off that they're loving and using to motivate themselves? You seriously believe that to be an OK thing to do?

dudeofqueen wrote: More proof of his narcissistic demeanour: A friend of mine if physio for the England Women's cricket team currently in Pert for the Women's T20 Cricket World Cup. The team were in the gym and had a Queen play list going and the girls were all singing during their training session. In to the guym walks Brian May who insisted that the music be turned off or, at the very least, down because "I don't want to hear it!" What an absolute fucking idiot.

dudeofqueen wrote: ST16, You'd hope that the Cricketers would have told him to fuck off, and turned it up, referring May to the Hotel Manager given that they are booked in to the hotel en-masse for the duration of the group stages of the tournament. Would guess that the revenue the hotel makes from touring England cricket teams when they visit Perth is far more valuable to them over the next few years than a one-off stay. May's a bell-end.

ST16 wrote: Brian's true colours are coming out at last which gives us all some answers as to why they were always arguing in the studio years ago.

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Vocal harmony, re: >all the time All the time? He's the one that's flogging Queen music to every advert that pops the question. He's the one agreeing to GH re-issues every 9 months or so. He's the one fronting publicity for a fictitious movie about the band that has reached a global audience. Then he has the temerity to go in to a hotel gym and demand that a group of elite athletes turn Queen music off that they're loving and using to motivate themselves? You seriously believe that to be an OK thing to do?

He is not "the one" flogging Queen music to every advert. That is the record company, that's what they do, they're making what they can out of the licence agreements they hold. It is not down to one person. The other thing about what you're claiming went on apparently having heard it from someone who apparently was part of it. . The official BBC interview with THE person involved reads slightly differently. My point still stands that most artists, especially on tour playing regularly, will not want to hear their songs during their time off. Carry on your anti Brian May, Q+AL stance it makes no difference to what is happening in the real world.

dudeofqueen wrote: Vocal harmony, re: >He is not "the one" flogging Queen music to every advert. That is the record company, that's what they do, they're making what they can out of the licence agreements they hold. It is not down to one person. Bullshit. If May said no, it would stop.

runner_70 wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: More proof of his narcissistic demeanour: A friend of mine if physio for the England Women's cricket team currently in Pert for the Women's T20 Cricket World Cup. The team were in the gym and had a Queen play list going and the girls were all singing during their training session. In to the guym walks Brian May who insisted that the music be turned off or, at the very least, down because "I don't want to hear it!" What an absolute fucking idiot.

Probably because it was all Freddie's songs not his. There you go-another proof that he completely lost the plot. What do the May Sheeps say now?

runner_70 wrote: What has has his behaviour to do with "how these things work" you clueless twat? He is a guest in a Hotel and acts if he owned it? So "how do these things work " you Clown? May acted like the bell end he is in 2020. WHy is it you NEVER EVER admit that your idol is doing something wrong? He might kill someone and you'd still say "well he deserved it"...... Sad really

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

It's your unwillingness to except that some people on here have some understanding (more than you) of how contractual obligations work. Yes He or More likely Queen productions and or Jim Beach but not necessarily Brian May on his own stopped a box set release. But at what point was it stopped and for what reason. You don't know. As for adverts. There are many that use other artists music. David Bowie hasn't popped up to push the use of his music in an ad campaign, but his record company certainly have. You seem to think Brian May has complete control over Queen, your talking crap. Do you really believe a song like Some Body To Love is under his control as an advertisement soundtrack when he hadn't written it. One of two things have happened there. Either as I pointed out to you before the way the songs are licensed to the record company means that they can ok their use or Jim Beach, Mary Austin and Freddie's sister have pushed for its use. The same goes for songs written by other band members wanting there songs used. The more likely reason is the first, record company licensing. Regarding your friend with the cricket team. She maybe as nice and courteous as you say, in which case you're reporting of the incident should have reflected that instead of claiming Brian walked in and made demands.

runner_70 wrote: You surely will come back with another lame comment about why May did the right thing by forcing a cricket team having fun listening to Queen songs. If it was his own song I believe there would be another Instagram story and a foto with the team.

brENsKi wrote:

runner_70 wrote: You surely will come back with another lame comment about why May did the right thing by forcing a cricket team having fun listening to Queen songs. If it was his own song I believe there would be another Instagram story and a foto with the team.

he really can't win with you (and your hate-mod) can he? think about it for a minute: if he'd decided to exercise with the Cricket Team with Queen songs playing...YOU would be the one calling him an "arrogant, conceited, prick" for "showing off" to his own tunes. only truly sad part? YOU actually enjoy these "damned if he does, damned if he doesn't" occasions, don't you?

runner_70 wrote:Another lame try to hijack the topic. THis is no "what if he did what". It is about WHAT HE REALLY did.

runner_70 wrote: This thread is about May wanting to shut down a cricket team listening to Queen you assclown. I do not Hate him you twat. I did not start the thread. I just think he completely lost the plot. YOU are hijacking the thread because you are too stupid to say that I am right and May was wrong.

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

It's your unwillingness to except that some people on here have some understanding (more than you) of how contractual obligations work. Yes He or More likely Queen productions and or Jim Beach but not necessarily Brian May on his own stopped a box set release. But at what point was it stopped and for what reason. You don't know. As for adverts. There are many that use other artists music. David Bowie hasn't popped up to push the use of his music in an ad campaign, but his record company certainly have. You seem to think Brian May has complete control over Queen, your talking crap. Do you really believe a song like Some Body To Love is under his control as an advertisement soundtrack when he hadn't written it. One of two things have happened there. Either as I pointed out to you before the way the songs are licensed to the record company means that they can ok their use or Jim Beach, Mary Austin and Freddie's sister have pushed for its use. The same goes for songs written by other band members wanting there songs used. The more likely reason is the first, record company licensing. Regarding your friend with the cricket team. She maybe as nice and courteous as you say, in which case you're reporting of the incident should have reflected that instead of claiming Brian walked in and made demands.

As usual you are trying to get off topic you sad fuck. We were talking about May's behaviour as a guest in a hotel towards other guests not about releasing music. SO try again. . . .

brENsKi wrote:

runner_70 wrote: This thread is about May wanting to shut down a cricket team listening to Queen you assclown. I do not Hate him you twat. I did not start the thread. I just think he completely lost the plot. YOU are hijacking the thread because you are too stupid to say that I am right and May was wrong.

the thread is about the cameraman incident. check the thread title: bluered it was hijacked by on page 10 and diverted re: the Cricket Team. this happened in red - two weeks later. i'm not hijacking anything. am replying to posts as they appear here. btw - if you don't hate Brian, how about a positive comment (from you) on anything he's done since 1998?

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

It's your unwillingness to except that some people on here have some understanding (more than you) of how contractual obligations work. Yes He or More likely Queen productions and or Jim Beach but not necessarily Brian May on his own stopped a box set release. But at what point was it stopped and for what reason. You don't know. As for adverts. There are many that use other artists music. David Bowie hasn't popped up to push the use of his music in an ad campaign, but his record company certainly have. You seem to think Brian May has complete control over Queen, your talking crap. Do you really believe a song like Some Body To Love is under his control as an advertisement soundtrack when he hadn't written it. One of two things have happened there. Either as I pointed out to you before the way the songs are licensed to the record company means that they can ok their use or Jim Beach, Mary Austin and Freddie's sister have pushed for its use. The same goes for songs written by other band members wanting there songs used. The more likely reason is the first, record company licensing. Regarding your friend with the cricket team. She maybe as nice and courteous as you say, in which case you're reporting of the incident should have reflected that instead of claiming Brian walked in and made demands.

As usual you are trying to get off topic you sad fuck. We were talking about May's behaviour as a guest in a hotel towards other guests not about releasing music. SO try again. . . .

Try reading the whole thread. If you do this you'll see it wasn't me who changed the original subject. The other thing you'll notice is that I was answering something that dudeofqueen brought up. It's obvious who is the sad fuck yet again, Rocker boy Weckwerth 70 proves what a gutter crawling imbecile he is yet again.

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

It's your unwillingness to except that some people on here have some understanding (more than you) of how contractual obligations work. Yes He or More likely Queen productions and or Jim Beach but not necessarily Brian May on his own stopped a box set release. But at what point was it stopped and for what reason. You don't know. As for adverts. There are many that use other artists music. David Bowie hasn't popped up to push the use of his music in an ad campaign, but his record company certainly have. You seem to think Brian May has complete control over Queen, your talking crap. Do you really believe a song like Some Body To Love is under his control as an advertisement soundtrack when he hadn't written it. One of two things have happened there. Either as I pointed out to you before the way the songs are licensed to the record company means that they can ok their use or Jim Beach, Mary Austin and Freddie's sister have pushed for its use. The same goes for songs written by other band members wanting there songs used. The more likely reason is the first, record company licensing. Regarding your friend with the cricket team. She maybe as nice and courteous as you say, in which case you're reporting of the incident should have reflected that instead of claiming Brian walked in and made demands.

As usual you are trying to get off topic you sad fuck. We were talking about May's behaviour as a guest in a hotel towards other guests not about releasing music. SO try again. . . .

Try reading the whole thread. If you do this you'll see it wasn't me who changed the original subject. The other thing you'll notice is that I was answering something that dudeofqueen brought up. It's obvious who is the sad fuck yet again, Rocker boy Weckwerth 70 proves what a gutter crawling imbecile he is yet again.

Maybe you should stick to answering topics you sad assclown. And take your fuckhead out of May's ass you bell-end

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

It's your unwillingness to except that some people on here have some understanding (more than you) of how contractual obligations work. Yes He or More likely Queen productions and or Jim Beach but not necessarily Brian May on his own stopped a box set release. But at what point was it stopped and for what reason. You don't know. As for adverts. There are many that use other artists music. David Bowie hasn't popped up to push the use of his music in an ad campaign, but his record company certainly have. You seem to think Brian May has complete control over Queen, your talking crap. Do you really believe a song like Some Body To Love is under his control as an advertisement soundtrack when he hadn't written it. One of two things have happened there. Either as I pointed out to you before the way the songs are licensed to the record company means that they can ok their use or Jim Beach, Mary Austin and Freddie's sister have pushed for its use. The same goes for songs written by other band members wanting there songs used. The more likely reason is the first, record company licensing. Regarding your friend with the cricket team. She maybe as nice and courteous as you say, in which case you're reporting of the incident should have reflected that instead of claiming Brian walked in and made demands.

As usual you are trying to get off topic you sad fuck. We were talking about May's behaviour as a guest in a hotel towards other guests not about releasing music. SO try again. . . .

Try reading the whole thread. If you do this you'll see it wasn't me who changed the original subject. The other thing you'll notice is that I was answering something that dudeofqueen brought up. It's obvious who is the sad fuck yet again, Rocker boy Weckwerth 70 proves what a gutter crawling imbecile he is yet again.

Maybe you should stick to answering topics you sad assclown. And take your fuckhead out of May's ass you bell-end

I did answer what was brought up in this thread you twat. I also gave you a straight forward answer to your post regarding me. I wrote it, like this one, in the style of your own posts you fuck dick. You're a fucking laughing stock because every time someone says something you don't agree with your first move is to insult them then claim that they are off topic. You've done it on every thread you ever post on, you've done it to people in this thread repeatedly. You end up coming across has someone with the views and communication abilities of a 12 year old. Not just a 12 year old but an uneducated badly raised 12 year old. I don't give a fuck about you or your twisted views, but what I do enjoy is replying to you in the manner that you reply to me, and others, because I know you can't stand being spoken too in the way you speake to the rest of this community and being made to look like the idiot you are. So carry on acting like the bell-end you are you putrid little fuck.

Elessar wrote: Difficult to know what happened (and why) without hearing May’s version of events, but I suspect the fact that a lot of the team didn’t recognise him contributed. I think that if they all knew who he was they’d have felt a bit awkward playing his music in front of him - it almost feels like a bit of a piss-take. Instead they were in the unfortunate situation of playing the man’s music in front of him without realising who he was. I’m sure they weren’t hugely offended. The youngsters who prefer Bieber to Queen will have at least seen the new A Star Is Born and will recall Bradley Cooper’s character saying he can’t stand listening to his own music. Or maybe he was just being a prick. It’s hard to be sure nowadays.

Elessar wrote: Or maybe he was just being a prick. It’s hard to be sure nowadays.

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Vocal harmony wrote:

dudeofqueen wrote: Officer Clawhauser, Nice to see you've taken time out from stuffing your fat face with doughnuts to grace us with your presence. We are desperately in need of a competent police officer and you've set yourself up nicely there. There's a bit of jam on your cheek chap - wipe it off will you? Re: >You obviously know nothing about the music business and its contractual obligations, and would clearly rather not learn about it But, of course, you do? May put the kybosh on a comprehensive box set in the early 2000's. Love him or hate him, Brooksy has presented some fantastic projects which have then been tweaked and fucked up by His Loopiness to the point that they are, in most cases, unfit for purpose. What he *says* **HAPPENS**; why are you so reluctant to accept that? Are you fucking him? >since it would force you to erode your hatred for Brian May. .......

It's your unwillingness to except that some people on here have some understanding (more than you) of how contractual obligations work. Yes He or More likely Queen productions and or Jim Beach but not necessarily Brian May on his own stopped a box set release. But at what point was it stopped and for what reason. You don't know. As for adverts. There are many that use other artists music. David Bowie hasn't popped up to push the use of his music in an ad campaign, but his record company certainly have. You seem to think Brian May has complete control over Queen, your talking crap. Do you really believe a song like Some Body To Love is under his control as an advertisement soundtrack when he hadn't written it. One of two things have happened there. Either as I pointed out to you before the way the songs are licensed to the record company means that they can ok their use or Jim Beach, Mary Austin and Freddie's sister have pushed for its use. The same goes for songs written by other band members wanting there songs used. The more likely reason is the first, record company licensing. Regarding your friend with the cricket team. She maybe as nice and courteous as you say, in which case you're reporting of the incident should have reflected that instead of claiming Brian walked in and made demands.

As usual you are trying to get off topic you sad fuck. We were talking about May's behaviour as a guest in a hotel towards other guests not about releasing music. SO try again. . . .

Try reading the whole thread. If you do this you'll see it wasn't me who changed the original subject. The other thing you'll notice is that I was answering something that dudeofqueen brought up. It's obvious who is the sad fuck yet again, Rocker boy Weckwerth 70 proves what a gutter crawling imbecile he is yet again.

Maybe you should stick to answering topics you sad assclown. And take your fuckhead out of May's ass you bell-end

I did answer what was brought up in this thread you twat. I also gave you a straight forward answer to your post regarding me. I wrote it, like this one, in the style of your own posts you fuck dick. You're a fucking laughing stock because every time someone says something you don't agree with your first move is to insult them then claim that they are off topic. You've done it on every thread you ever post on, you've done it to people in this thread repeatedly. You end up coming across has someone with the views and communication abilities of a 12 year old. Not just a 12 year old but an uneducated badly raised 12 year old. I don't give a fuck about you or your twisted views, but what I do enjoy is replying to you in the manner that you reply to me, and others, because I know you can't stand being spoken too in the way you speake to the rest of this community and being made to look like the idiot you are. So carry on acting like the bell-end you are you putrid little fuck.

SO what you think about your idol sending his sec to a WOmen's sports team and asks them to turn off Queen music. ...... That is what the topic is all about. You obviously are a re pussy because you are not answering

runner_70 wrote:

Elessar wrote: Or maybe he was just being a prick. It’s hard to be sure nowadays.

The Australian tour could be labelled "I am a Prick" Tour 2020

ST16 wrote: May is punching above his weight thinking he is god on his visits.............Turn that camera off..... Turn that Queen music off...... But..... All cameras and phones on for my pet Adam!

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote: May is punching above his weight thinking he is god on his visits.............Turn that camera off..... Turn that Queen music off...... But..... All cameras and phones on for my pet Adam!

how do YOU know what Brian May is thinking? unless Brian told you that specifically - or you're a telepath, then you have no conceivable idea what Brian was thinking. fact that you (yet again) couldn't leave an anti-AL comment out of something completely unconnected, renders your post nothing more than the usual Anti-May/Lambert agenda you've had [on here SIC] since the day you arrived.

runner_70 wrote:

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote: May is punching above his weight thinking he is god on his visits.............Turn that camera off..... Turn that Queen music off...... But..... All cameras and phones on for my pet Adam!

how do YOU know what Brian May is thinking? unless Brian told you that specifically - or you're a telepath, then you have no conceivable idea what Brian was thinking. fact that you (yet again) couldn't leave an anti-AL comment out of something completely unconnected, renders your post nothing more than the usual Anti-May/Lambert agenda you've had [on here SIC] since the day you arrived.

Still hijacking and being a pussy when it comes to the question if May was wrong or right in the hotel....

ST16 wrote:Turn that camera off..... Turn that Queen music off...... But..... All cameras and phones on for my pet Adam!

brENsKi wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote: May is punching above his weight thinking he is god on his visits.............Turn that camera off..... Turn that Queen music off...... But..... All cameras and phones on for my pet Adam!

how do YOU know what Brian May is thinking? unless Brian told you that specifically - or you're a telepath, then you have no conceivable idea what Brian was thinking. fact that you (yet again) couldn't leave an anti-AL comment out of something completely unconnected, renders your post nothing more than the usual Anti-May/Lambert agenda you've had [on here SIC] since the day you arrived.

Still hijacking and being a pussy when it comes to the question if May was wrong or right in the hotel....

care to explain how responding precisely and relevantly to a post in this thread is "hijacking"? https://i.imgur.com/QeUtBOil.jpg" title="source: imgur.com" />

runner_70 wrote:As you are a pussy when it comes o answering a simple Question: DO you think it was right for May to close their Queen party down. Dont be a pussy

Freddie Jupiter wrote:I'm absolutely astounded at the amount of mental gymnastics some people are prepared to engage in on this forum to justify Brian's appaling, and progressively worsening, behaviour. There is no justifying his disgusting treatment of the cameraman in Brisbane or his narcissistic, entitled behaviour in that hotel. Quite simply he was in the wrong on both accounts, and in the first case he was indisputably in the wrong from a purely legal perspective as well. And this is aside from his continuous attempts to erase Freddie's immense contribution to queens success and continuing popularity by employing an overweight karaoke singer and by outright lying in the queen movie, (now known as Brian's revenge) Quite simply Brian's immense envy towards Freddie is going to destroy him and queens legacy. In fact it's gotten to a point where i simply can't enjoy listening to queen, my favourite band for two decades, anymore. I really believe that fans should band together in disapproval of his behaviour and the genral direction in which he has been steering queens legacy, instead of supporting it and feeding his near infinite narcissism and self-importance.

ST16 wrote:@Brenski Why are you been such a prick for? You are very obnoxious and you have no right to judge other peoples posts on here because you are not god. Get off your high horse and let people have there say . Just shows you do not know who is posting what and now you are accusing me of been "Freddie Jupiter" to which i need an apology from you.

Freddie Jupiter wrote: I'm absolutely astounded at the amount of mental gymnastics some people are prepared to engage in on this forum to justify Brian's appaling, and progressively worsening, behaviour. There is no justifying his disgusting treatment of the cameraman in Brisbane or his narcissistic, entitled behaviour in that hotel. Quite simply he was in the wrong on both accounts, and in the first case he was indisputably in the wrong from a purely legal perspective as well. And this is aside from his continuous attempts to erase Freddie's immense contribution to queens success and continuing popularity by employing an overweight karaoke singer and by outright lying in the queen movie, (now known as Brian's revenge) Quite simply Brian's immense envy towards Freddie is going to destroy him and queens legacy. In fact it's gotten to a point where i simply can't enjoy listening to queen, my favourite band for two decades, anymore. I really believe that fans should band together in disapproval of his behaviour and the genral direction in which he has been steering queens legacy, instead of supporting it and feeding his near infinite narcissism and self-importance.

ST16 wrote: He dis not own that Gym so he had NO right to demand the music be changed, and he had NO right to tell the camera man to turn it off when he is in a different country . . . .

Freddie Jupiter wrote: It's very simple. It's not illegal to film anybody in a public place in Australia. Brian certainly can ask a cameramen to stop filming, but the cameraman is not compelled by law to stop, and has a right to refuse to comply with Brian's request. What Brian has no right to do is try to coerce a cameraman to stop filming just because it happens to be Inconvenient for him; it doesn't work that way. As far as the hotel incident is concerned, he was just being a dick there. No laws were broken there.

ST16 wrote: @Brenski Did you google that lol because we all know at that time of the night you are wasted!

Freddie Jupiter wrote: brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed. It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that. Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

Young Music Fan wrote:

Freddie Jupiter wrote: brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed. It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that. Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

The cameramen didn't have Brian's permission, what don't you understand about that?

Freddie Jupiter wrote: brenski, what is this cherry picked bullshit you've posted. i know the law and it's not illegal to be filmed in public. There are some circumstances where you might need to obtain permission from the council but not from the person being filmed. It's true that you're not allowed to be intrusive and stalk people, but the cameraman was not doing any of that. Just accept already that Brian was in the wrong. Why is that so hard for you to do?

brENsKi wrote: redwrong again: the actual Australian Law by definition states: Even if you’re filming somewhere where it is perfectly legal, your conduct may amount to a criminal offence if it is disruptive to others. Here are a few tips that may help you determine whether or not to hit the record button in Australia: Alternatively, if you’re filming for financial gain or for a business, then you are filming for a commercial purpose.If you’re filming for a commercial purpose, you may need to obtain permission from the people who will be in your footage...

ST16 wrote: redblue

Freddie Jupiter wrote: More bullshit and obfuscation from you Brenski. First of all how do you know that he didn't have a permit to film. Did Brian ask for his permit before assaulting him? Second how do you you know that he even needed am permit in this case, given that a permit is not always required even if filming for financial gain. Third he was filming with his phone for personal use at the time of the assault, and the law is very clear and unambiguous that when filming for personal use a permit is NEVER required. Just accept that Brian was in the wrong finally. You'll feel better.

Freddie Jupiter wrote: No, the cameraman did absolutely nothing wrong - he was doing his job and nothing he did was illegal. As to why he didn't press charges is anyone's guess. Perhaps he genuinely was a queen fan as he said, and the whole process would have been a royal pain in the ass anyway.

ST16 wrote: Freddie Jupiter You are wasting your time with Brenski he is Irish and cannot compute small pieces of info. just leave it and chat with someone who has a brain.

Freddie Jupiter wrote: Are you thick or something? I've already explained that he could have had a permit, and that a permit is not always necessary, even when filming for financial gain. Plus he was filming for his personal use at the time of the assault and not for financial gain. And Brian has no right to stop him from filming even if the cameraman was breaking the law because that would be taking the law into your own hands, and that's illegal. Whichever way you slice it, Brian was in the wrong, and there is zero evidence that the cameraman was breaking any law in any way whatever. Why are we still talking about this? Learn to accept facts and truth and move on. There is no other way.

brENsKi wrote:

ST16 wrote: Freddie Jupiter You are wasting your time with Brenski he is Irish and cannot compute small pieces of info. just leave it and chat with someone who has a brain.

https://i.imgur.com/c1SWmEs.png?1" title="source: imgur.com" />

ST16 wrote:Get over yourself snowflake !

ST16 wrote:[color=blue]Brenski Chill out and stop been a drama queen. I honestly do not give a fuck what you think of me.[/color]

ST16 wrote:blue

ST16 wrote:blue

Freddie Jupiter wrote: @vocal harmony, you still don't get it, do you? The law is the law and it's not necessarily what you think is right or what you think should happen. It also doesn't care if Brian was pissed or if the fans were pissed or if their parents were pissed blah blah blah... At the end of the day there is zero evidence that the cameraman did anything illegal, unlike Brian who clearly broke the law by taking the law into his own hands. Once again accept it and move on. You can rationalise away that which cannot be rationalised away.

Freddie Jupiter wrote: Young music fan, that is not an excuse in the eyes of the law. The cameraman was not doing anything illegal. Brian broke the law by taking the law into his own hands. The incident also never would have happened if Brian had got back in his car and drove away, or invited to meet the fans back at his hotel. Brian doesn't own the world and can't order everybody around him to do as he pleases and to act according to what is convenient for Brian at all times. It doesn't work that way.

Freddie Jupiter wrote: Brenski, are you playing the village idiot here? The permit to film is obtained from the council, not from Brian. This is a public place, not Brian's house. If Brian has an issue with being filmed he can cover his face or get in his car and drive away. Besides, at the time of the assault the camera guy was filming on his personal phone, and a permit is NEVER required to do that.

brENsKi wrote:

Freddie Jupiter wrote: Brenski, are you playing the village idiot here? The permit to film is obtained from the council, not from Brian. This is a public place, not Brian's house. If Brian has an issue with being filmed he can cover his face or get in his car and drive away. Besides, at the time of the assault the camera guy was filming on his personal phone, and a permit is NEVER required to do that.

no. but YOU are! and the rules on filming an individual are quite clear: permission is assumed unless the individual says NO. Brian said no, so at that point anyone else in the vicinity can be filmed but not Brian. cameraman continued to film Brian - against his wishes - he broke the law by going against the individual's express wish. which is why he didn't press charges.

MisterCosmicc wrote: Man, Brenski. What's going on? I understand going after worship, but how come you don't go after the people who worship Adam?

ST16 wrote:[/b . . . . Since Freddie died May has made sure he gets the recognition now and does things his way and poor Roger tags along for the ride, what Brian wants Brian has to get or god help those in the firing line.

ST16 wrote:Brenski Are you getting paid from Brian to defend his guilty disgusting actions then?

STD16 wrote: Vocal Harmony tut tut you need to wing your neck in etc

blueblue

purplepurple

greengreen

orangeorange

brownbrown

redred

brENsKi wrote:Gerry, are you being paid by the BNP to be a racist pig?...or is racist pig your natural disposition?

ST16 wrote: Ha ha ha no sadly i am not getting paid cos i would gladly do it voluntary to get back at bullies like you and your alter ego Vocal Harmony !

Freddie Jupiter wrote:Come on you guys, all these personal attacks and constant bickering are going to achieve nothing. The only way we are going to achieve anything constructive is if we all unite in our disapproval of Brian's increasingly poor behaviour and the unpalatable direction in which he has been steering the band's legacy.

Vocal harmony wrote:I am who I always have been on here. Just me, one person. This of course can not be said of you with your multiple identities which are blatant attempts to hide your abusive, racist and unhinged views.

Freddie Jupiter wrote: @Brenski, stop pretending to know who I am, because you don't know shit. This is literally my third of fourth day on this forum. I wouldn't even have come here in the first place had it not been for Brian making the news in Australia assaulting a news cameraman. That literally made me embarrassed to be a queen fan. The man is destroying the legacy of one of the most phenomenal bands of all time and needs to be stopped. And finally stop clogging this thread with your constant bickering with Gerry, or whoever it is that you're trying to insult.

Freddie Jupiter wrote:Also I doubt Gerry will ever apologise so stop wasting your time.

ST16 wrote: @Freddie Jupiter As you are new on here i will tell you that Brenski is the sites trouble maker and he starts all the rows on here, so that has cleared that one up. These morons will only continue there tirade of abuse if no one puts there foot down like i am. Many many thread have been ruined by Irish Brenski he gets off by insulting folk.

ST16 wrote:Brenski Lets face it you are a stalker on here because you have stalked every post i have sent in the last two weeks, you are obsessed with bullying and having the last word to make you look superior.

blueblue

QE2. wrote:Brenski You do stalk me daily on every thread available so stop telling lies and grow up.

QE2. wrote: Brenski Sorry but that post was sent today it is not a six day old post, and for the record you do stalk me every single day harass would be a better word for it really.