| The Real Wizard 31.07.2014 14:18 |
I can't believe I'm doing this, on two levels.. One, that I actually just listened to an incredible live version of The Fairy Feller's Master-Stroke. But two - that the first 13 seconds, for some inexplicable reason, ran a quarter step too slow and that I needed to correct it. link ... compared to the original - link Who made this decision thinking it was somehow a good idea !? Looking forward to the ensuing discussion. This should be juicy. |
| MadTheSwine73 31.07.2014 14:22 |
Thanks for this. It seemed odd when I first listened to it, but I forgot about it since the PERFORMANCE IS AWESOME. |
| Nitroboy 31.07.2014 14:24 |
I think it was done by the uploader as to avoid YouTube's automatic copyright-thingy :O |
| The Real Wizard 31.07.2014 14:31 |
Nitroboy wrote: I think it was done by the uploader as to avoid YouTube's automatic copyright-thingy :OIndeed sir, you are correct ! I just checked iTunes and the speed is correct. Score ten points for Nitroboy. |
| Nitroboy 31.07.2014 14:37 |
Thank you ;) I'm curious though, for when I look at the iTunes Store the only preview I have is of Keep Yourself Alive from the November show(s) :O |
| The Real Wizard 31.07.2014 14:38 |
I guess it depends on which country you're from.. |
| Rick 31.07.2014 14:42 |
Change it to Canada and voila :) |
| bootLuca 31.07.2014 15:23 |
I want to wait until september before listening to this.... but I can't wait! ;-) |
| Marknow 31.07.2014 15:32 |
I think in your excitement Bob that you forgot you were posting official material from iTunes? :P Not that I'm complaining mind! :) |
| The Real Wizard 31.07.2014 15:36 |
Ha ! Well, not everyone in the world can access this at the moment, so why the heck not? It's just a sample and is freely available to begin with. |
| on my way up 31.07.2014 15:42 |
MY MIND IS BLOWN! |
| pittrek 31.07.2014 15:44 |
Great stuff! |
| inu-liger 31.07.2014 15:47 |
on my way up wrote:MY MIND IS BLOWN!MINE TOO! D: |
| Nitroboy 31.07.2014 15:52 |
If anyone still has doubts in this release, they must be mental. |
| Jamie1977 31.07.2014 16:10 |
Very nice!! |
| Chief Mouse 31.07.2014 16:17 |
Beautiful! Thanks :) |
| brENsKi 31.07.2014 16:20 |
fucks' sake!!!...no bloody hell!!!...jeez!!! stunned love it!!!! |
| Gregsynth 31.07.2014 17:27 |
One of the best Queen-related things I've heard in a while (and it's just a sample!!!)!!! Can't wait for the release date! |
| Vali 31.07.2014 17:28 |
I'm speechless. Could never imagine this live perfomance would be SO GOOD!! |
| Cruella de Vil 31.07.2014 18:04 |
Holy shit, they actually did it and darn well too. This is going to be a great release! |
| BETA215 31.07.2014 19:06 |
AMAZING. I'M MIND BLOWN. BEAUTIFUL. INCREDIBLE NEW LIVE SONG EXCELLENTLY INTERPRETED. I'M SPEECHLESS. GREAT! Like GregSynth said: One of the best Queen-related things I've heard in a while (and it's just a sample!!!)!!! Can't wait for the release date! PS: There's a lot of hype in my brain right now! |
| Saint Jiub 31.07.2014 20:51 |
Sound great. Overdubs? Did QPL intentionally "self-pirate" this short excerpt to explosively hype September 9th? |
| Nitroboy 31.07.2014 21:28 |
Panchgani wrote: Sound great. Overdubs? Did QPL intentionally "self-pirate" this short excerpt to explosively hype September 9th? This isn't something that leaked, it's the sample clip from iTunes |
| Saint Jiub 31.07.2014 21:49 |
Nitroboy wrote:Panchgani wrote: Sound great. Overdubs? Did QPL intentionally "self-pirate" this short excerpt to explosively hype September 9th?This isn't something that leaked, it's the sample clip from iTunes ........ Why did the first 13 seconds of the excerpt need to be corrected ("to avoid YouTube's automatic copyright-thingy")?? |
| Saint Jiub 31.07.2014 21:59 |
Nevermind ... I just read the other topic ... It was a nice listen that did not require me to download Apple crapware. |
| Cruella de Vil 31.07.2014 22:28 |
Sorry to be here twice, but I'm Still scanning the samples. What a great job on the audio mix! Hell, this will be played loud and nasty when it comes home in September. This is just superb stuff! |
| Brian Maybe 31.07.2014 22:49 |
Oh my freakin' God, this is EPIC!! This is gonna be some money well spent for this release! And Bob, you rock! (but you knew that... ;-) |
| musicland munich 31.07.2014 23:09 |
Thank you ! Looking forward to it's god damn release ! |
| Jimmy Dean 31.07.2014 23:39 |
WOW. IT'S REALLY INSANE. After all the bootlegs and all these years. This is beyond ear candy. Listen to Brian nail all the parts. Clearly the main reasons why this wasn't played often was due to Freddie straining his voice on a song that likely would alienate the audience rather than win them. Everyone wants Hangman... but holy f**k... who cares when we get to hear this! |
| cmi 01.08.2014 01:09 |
Fantastic!!! It works great as a live song. It's a pity it was performed so rarely. |
| friedrich 01.08.2014 02:09 |
what a hell of a band! thanks for sharing!! i can't wait!!! is there a a capella part in the arrangement? |
| The Real Wizard 01.08.2014 03:30 |
Jimmy Dean wrote: Everyone wants Hangman... but holy f**k... who cares when we get to hear this!Ding! friedrich wrote: what a hell of a band! thanks for sharing!! i can't wait!!! is there a a capella part in the arrangement?Sounds like it ! |
| inu-liger 01.08.2014 03:48 |
Here's a better quality rip of the iTunes preview stream, with liberties taken to de-fade in/out so you can better hear the a cappella bit :) |
| BETA215 01.08.2014 04:22 |
inu-liger wrote: Here's a better quality rip of the iTunes preview stream, with liberties taken to de-fade in/out so you can better hear the a cappella bit :)Can you upload it to a page like MEGA/MediaFire? I can't download it. |
| inu-liger 01.08.2014 04:24 |
BETA215 wrote:http://www.mediafire.com/download/7woz38yyc6zum17/Queen_-_The_Fairy_Feller's_Master-Stroke_(Live_-_iTunes_Sample_-_Enhanced).flacinu-liger wrote: Here's a better quality rip of the iTunes preview stream, with liberties taken to de-fade in/out so you can better hear the a cappella bit :)Can you upload it to a page like MEGA/MediaFire? I can't download it. |
| thomasquinn 32989 01.08.2014 04:42 |
This is so totally amazing! Greatest Queen(-related) thing I've heard since the Sun City leak featuring My Fairy King! |
| Lazing On A Sunday Afternoon 01.08.2014 05:33 |
This is just wonderful!! Thanks for sharing :-) |
| pua 01.08.2014 06:24 |
So it was true..? IT SOUNDS AMAZING BEST RELEASE IN YEARS. |
| alberbal12 01.08.2014 06:25 |
A wonderful recording for the most wonderful group in whole history!! |
| MercurialFreddie 01.08.2014 06:43 |
This live performance is terrific ! Can't stand the fact that we heave yet to wait whole month to get the full release. It's excruciating ! One question though, is it just me or during the "Soldier sailor tinker tailor ploughboy, waiting to hear the sound" part Freddie's voice seem to be sped up ? |
| Nitroboy 01.08.2014 06:47 |
MercurialFreddie wrote: This live performance is terrific ! Can't stand the fact that we heave yet to wait whole month to get the full release. It's excruciating ! One question though, is it just me or during the "Soldier sailor tinker tailor ploughboy, waiting to hear the sound" part Freddie's voice seem to be sped up ? That's just you :) Freddie hits the C5 beautifully if you ask me. |
| MercurialFreddie 01.08.2014 07:07 |
Ok, thanks for clarifying that one for me ! :) |
| Oscar J 01.08.2014 07:15 |
To me, the C5 sounds very computer processed which makes me think that he didn't actually hit it in the original tape (possibly cracking it or hitting an A4 or something). If QP wants to pitch correct an icon like Freddie Mercury, they should at least be hiring people that can do it with some finesse. |
| princetom 01.08.2014 07:41 |
Nitroboy wrote:sounds strange, processed, and unnatural,though.One question though, is it just me or during the "Soldier sailor tinker tailor ploughboy, waiting to hear the sound" part Freddie's voice seem to be sped up ?That's just you :) Freddie hits the C5 beautifully if you ask me. but nice to hear a gem like "master-stroke"! damn. after all these years... |
| The King Of Rhye 01.08.2014 08:24 |
Freddie just nails the harpsichord part on the piano...................just awesome all the way around...... |
| ploughman 01.08.2014 09:09 |
The only sad thing is that this March Rainbow show too was already overdubbed heavily. I think they planned to release it as an live album and did the overedubs already 1974. You can hear this on the backing vocals on many of the songs. Like Seven seas of rhye. |
| on my way up 01.08.2014 09:14 |
ploughman wrote: The only sad thing is that this March Rainbow show too was already overdubbed heavily. I think they planned to release it as an live album and did the overedubs already 1974. You can hear this on the backing vocals on many of the songs. Like Seven seas of rhye.Well, the vocal harmonies were pretty impressive live around this time... maybe there's less overdubbing - but just better performance - than we think. On some boots the vocal harmonies are pretty spot on too... |
| Nitroboy 01.08.2014 09:49 |
ploughman wrote: The only sad thing is that this March Rainbow show too was already overdubbed heavily. I think they planned to release it as an live album and did the overedubs already 1974. You can hear this on the backing vocals on many of the songs. Like Seven seas of rhye. If you're talking about when Freddie and Roger nails the G5 on "Forever, ever, ever!" That's 100% live, not overdubbed. |
| GERRYISADICK 01.08.2014 09:54 |
^^ Thats live? It sounds to perfect. |
| Nitroboy 01.08.2014 09:58 |
Has it ever occurred to you people that Queen gained such huge success because they were extremely talented? |
| GERRYISADICK 01.08.2014 10:05 |
Yes Ill shut up |
| jondickens1 01.08.2014 10:52 |
The "soldier sailor tinker tailor plough boy wait did u hear the sound bit sounds very odd to me to. The word "sound" in that vocal sounds like a twanging rubber band. Very peculiar. |
| ploughman 01.08.2014 11:23 |
Nitroboy wrote:Since I heard this Rainbow 1974 (Originally "Sheetkeekers" bootleg) I noticed there are too many voices going on. Two Freddies and two Roger falsettoes at the same time. I know they were talented, but they knew the post-prod tricks too.ploughman wrote: The only sad thing is that this March Rainbow show too was already overdubbed heavily. I think they planned to release it as an live album and did the overedubs already 1974. You can hear this on the backing vocals on many of the songs. Like Seven seas of rhye.If you're talking about when Freddie and Roger nails the G5 on "Forever, ever, ever!" That's 100% live, not overdubbed. |
| Oscar J 01.08.2014 11:27 |
jondickens1 wrote: The "soldier sailor tinker tailor plough boy wait did u hear the sound bit sounds very odd to me to. The word "sound" in that vocal sounds like a twanging rubber band. Very peculiar.Yes, sounds like they've been going all out in Pro Tools on that particular line. Still, the rest sounds absolutely wonderful - even for Queen it must have been a challenge playing it this tight live. Will be interesting to hear whether they even nailed that bitchy timing in the intro of the song. The piano is very high in the mix, good thing Freddie isn't flubbing that much. |
| GERRYISADICK 01.08.2014 11:30 |
Do you doubt the ability of queen in the 70s |
| Oscar J 01.08.2014 11:47 |
Not really, no. :) That "ability" is what makes this my favourite period of the band, both live and in studio. |
| Erik Viking 01.08.2014 11:52 |
It seems that my countless plays DOTL and LMEY from Live Killers have a worthy successor. The (Master!) Fairy(..>) is so dynamic and daring .... Hats off. Great! Give it to me! :) |
| Rien 01.08.2014 12:27 |
just listened to it. Thrilling to hear something from Queen for the first time... :) |
| MercurialFreddie 01.08.2014 17:59 |
I also do not doubt in their technical abilities but the word "sound" indeed just sounds strange. I have no problem with using Pro Tools as all the bands do it with live recorded material, but I wouldn't like see one day on the Internet or in a review of the 1974 Rainbow live album slagging off or ridiculing Queen for masking live mistakes / going too far with production etc. The press has not been kind to Queen and some magazines are eager to embellish something deemed negative by them and at the same time not mention everything which is tremendously good about this gig. |
| fjac1980 01.08.2014 18:33 |
the best Queen's discover in two decades!!!!! |
| JacquesDaniels 02.08.2014 08:42 |
I hate to say it, but although the rest of the clip sounds pretty damn good and promising, Freddie's vocals sound like they have been autotuned all the way, although the most obvious part is in the "Soldier, sailor" bit. I hope the low quality of the sample proves me wrong, but usually I can easily detect these, because I have used autotune in the studio for effect and tinkered with it elsewhere. Still, can't wait to hear the rest of it. |
| mrdata1968 02.08.2014 09:38 |
Drums are mono, the mix on Sheetkeeckers is better. |
| ploughman 02.08.2014 12:44 |
The songs that WERE on the Sheetkeeckers are different. They clearly selected the songs that went best during the night, overfubbed vocals and maybe some guitars(?) in the studio and these are the tracks we know. Like Seven Seas of Rhye, which has way too many voices to be only Roger-Freddie-Brian. Fairy Feller is different. It was clearly not selected to be on the live album (that never actually metamorphosed), so there are no overdubs. But as mentioned some really violent vocal corrections with a little help of Pro Tools. Still. It sound quite magnificient and with only three voices they did amazing job! I just had hoped, thay would have get rid of all those ovedubs, also for the November Show. I hate to hear so many Freddies and Rogers singing on "Just a new man" during Now I'm Here. Thay were really great live and wouldnt have needed to do these overdubs. |
| MercurialFreddie 02.08.2014 15:25 |
Yes, the fact alone that they've decided to perform it and the way they did it proves (again) that Queen is a hell of a band. They stepped out from their safe-zone and gave rendition of a song which is incredibly complex in terms of vocals (those harmonies!), harmony and tempo. They did an incredible job. Is it possible that they've performed it more than once ? Concerning the word "sound" -> I don't know who is responsible from restoring, audio engineering or remixing the original vocals but I hope that the change will be made even at the eleventh hour. This tiny bit really stand out and I'd recommend at least minimizing the effect they have used on Freddie's voice. Of course there is always a possibility that that was the way Freddie sang it on the gig originally. If an audience tape of this show emerge, then we will know for sure. |
| dysan 02.08.2014 16:23 |
That is just amazing. Goosebumps and tears this end. Stunning. |
| Holly2003 02.08.2014 16:43 |
That particular bit of the song doesn't sound as doctored here: link Maybe the original upload here was poorer quality? |
| Gregsynth 02.08.2014 17:25 |
Here's an even better quality version Holly! |
| Ale Solan 02.08.2014 18:34 |
Gregsynth wrote: Here's an even better quality version Holly!file's gone? |
| Gregsynth 03.08.2014 01:21 |
link Here's the link to the higher quality sample. |
| MercurialFreddie 03.08.2014 03:42 |
Greg, could you refer to the track in the context of autotuning or overdubbing ? |
| Vocal harmony 03.08.2014 07:46 |
Proof of what an amazing band they were in those days. It's a shame that the spirit that drove them to attempt and pull this off, and other songs too, had long gone by the time The Magic Tour happened. They were a different band back then. |
| Oscar J 03.08.2014 17:29 |
I din't think that's a shame, I mean - we've got this! And we got hundreds of other concerts they performed where they really did put the music first like here. And we should be open minded and realise that Queen, by moving towards more radio friendly pop music, found a way into even more millions of people's hearts. |
| Holly2003 04.08.2014 05:04 |
I don't think that's important at all. If some people's taste in music is so bland all they can handle is I Want to Break Free and My Baby Does Me then that's more to be pitied than celebrated. Popularity is not a measure of musical quality. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oscar J wrote: And we should be open minded and realise that Queen, by moving towards more radio friendly pop music, found a way into even more millions of people's hearts. |
| Oscar J 04.08.2014 07:14 |
That's another way to put it. :) |
| Mrmarioanonym 08.08.2014 14:04 |
for me the whole song sounds autotuned. i know how good freddie is but i can clearly hear autotune artifacts on there. i hope they didn't do this to the entire gig. that would be a dealbreaker. also some of the harmonies sound "harmonized" |
| pittrek 08.08.2014 14:22 |
OK there are a few weird "artifacts" in Freddie's vocal on a few parts, but I can't understand why people claim that the backing vocals were overdubbed? And Freddie does sound similar to the bootlegs |
| Mrmarioanonym 08.08.2014 17:52 |
i don't mean overdubbed per se rather than someone slapping a harmonizer on one or two vocals to make it sound as big as the album version. |
| dysan 09.08.2014 06:09 |
The artefacts on his voice could easily pass as cracks and mannerisms? I think it sounds amazing. Never heard May sound so baroque. This recording has really effected me in a way I never thought Queen would again. |
| Holly2003 09.08.2014 06:33 |
Very well put. I feel exactly the same. -------------------------------------------------------- dysan wrote: The artefacts on his voice could easily pass as cracks and mannerisms? I think it sounds amazing. Never heard May sound so baroque. This recording has really effected me in a way I never thought Queen would again. |
| The Real Wizard 09.08.2014 13:54 |
^ I'll second that. |
| Marknow 09.08.2014 14:13 |
Does it have overdubs? You bet your ass it does, just like Rock Montreal, Milton Keynes, Wembley. Overdubs are nothing new on live releases, in my opinion they do not diminish them, it's par for the course. This is the greatest ever live package release by Queen and I have bought every format. Now, wheres Mr. Postman? :)... |
| Oscar J 10.08.2014 14:44 |
Holly2003 wrote:Very well put. I feel exactly the same. -------------------------------------------------------- dysan wrote: The artefacts on his voice could easily pass as cracks and mannerisms? I think it sounds amazing. Never heard May sound so baroque. This recording has really effected me in a way I never thought Queen would again. I have to disagree - I really trust my ears here. I've been messing around with auto tune and pitch correction when I have singers coming over to my home studio, and those slightly twangy, smurf sounding vocals are what you end up with if you overdo it. Still, if people don't think it's that noticeable, who cares right? :) |
| on my way up 10.08.2014 15:20 |
Oscar J wrote:Freddie could sound like a smurf at times ;-)Holly2003 wrote:I have to disagree - I really trust my ears here. I've been messing around with auto tune and pitch correction when I have singers coming over to my home studio, and those slightly twangy, smurf sounding vocals are what you end up with if you overdo it. Still, if people don't think it's that noticeable, who cares right? :)Very well put. I feel exactly the same. -------------------------------------------------------- dysan wrote: The artefacts on his voice could easily pass as cracks and mannerisms? I think it sounds amazing. Never heard May sound so baroque. This recording has really effected me in a way I never thought Queen would again. |
| pittrek 10.08.2014 15:31 |
Oscar J wrote:Timestamps please, thanksHolly2003 wrote:I have to disagree - I really trust my ears here. I've been messing around with auto tune and pitch correction when I have singers coming over to my home studio, and those slightly twangy, smurf sounding vocals are what you end up with if you overdo it. Still, if people don't think it's that noticeable, who cares right? :)Very well put. I feel exactly the same. -------------------------------------------------------- dysan wrote: The artefacts on his voice could easily pass as cracks and mannerisms? I think it sounds amazing. Never heard May sound so baroque. This recording has really effected me in a way I never thought Queen would again. |
| Chief Mouse 10.08.2014 15:39 |
'...the sound' sounds a bit autotunish to me. |
| Oscar J 10.08.2014 16:03 |
PLOUGHboy sounds rather weird too, at least that note was the one that got me thinking. Come to say HELLO could also have something done to it, although I'm not sure. Will be interesting to hear the rest of it - wonder if the senaTORial pipe C5 is on there as well. Probably not though, since it's in a harmony part and Freddie could let Roger go for that one, like he did on "trumpeter". Another thing I'm pretty sure they've done with this - is putting Freddies line from the studio version of the words "under lady's gown" as an overdub (although it's fairly low in the mix). That soft falsetto just can't be Roger's. |
| Nitroboy 10.08.2014 16:26 |
Oscar J wrote: Freddie could let Roger go for that one, like he did on "trumpeter". Another thing I'm pretty sure they've done with this - is putting Freddies line from the studio version of the words "under lady's gown" as an overdub (although it's fairly low in the mix). That soft falsetto just can't be Roger's. None of these things are in the live sample?? |
| Oscar J 10.08.2014 16:43 |
You're right about the first thing - I just meant since they're doing harmonies on "trumpeter", Freddie could alter his part of the harmony so that he didn't have to get the high note. But in the "under lady's gown" line, the album phrasing certainly is there deep down in the mix - have a closer listen to the harmonies. I'm not talking about Freddie's live lead vocals, but about the harmonies in the background. Pretty sure they've copy-pasted some stuff from the studio version multitrack there. You have to admire the work they've put into this! All speculations of course. |
| Nitroboy 10.08.2014 19:21 |
I really don't hear anything odd on those two phrases. |
| Oscar J 11.08.2014 07:49 |
Why would there be anything odd? I don't think you understand what I'm saying. :( |
| Benn Kempster 11.08.2014 08:29 |
I'm waiting on hearing the whole thing in situ - picking apart a sample of a few seconds is great journalism but in the context of the whole thing which hasn't been heard yet? Has anyone considered that this auto-tuning has been done in order to generate just this kind of response prior to the actual release? Not saying that we're not going to get a release saddled with artifacts like this all over it, but am preferring to wait until the proof is in the pudding....... |
| Oscar J 11.08.2014 08:42 |
Yep. The fact that the samples have been taken down from iTunes makes me think that maybe they've realised that there are some things that need fine tuning in order to show the material in public. |
| bootLuca 11.08.2014 09:18 |
Oscar J wrote: Yep. The fact that the samples have been taken down from iTunes makes me think that maybe they've realised that there are some things that need fine tuning in order to show the material in public.if so the release date would be delayed... |
| Oscar J 11.08.2014 09:18 |
Let's hope it's not. |
| GinjaNinja 11.08.2014 09:42 |
There are 30 second previews available here: link They're a bit different to the iTunes samples so we can hear a couple more lines from Fairy Feller. |
| BETA215 11.08.2014 10:42 |
Can somebody do a merge between the Amazon and the iTunes samples? That would be amazing. But please, in different files, not like the iTunes sample who are all together in one file Or at least, the enhanced version by Inu-Liger of TFFMS merged with the Amazon version. |
| The Real Wizard 11.08.2014 15:07 |
The only autotune I can hear is the "plough" on ploughboy. The high C just isn't hit cleanly. Without hearing the original it's hard to be 100% sure, and if it was really necessary. That said - when the BBC broadcast Hammersmith 75 in 2009, someone posted a file of White Queen with the original audio in one channel and the 2009 audio in the other, revealing little autotune tweaks of Freddie. I can't lie, that was extremely disappointing. I'd heard that version of White Queen for a decade and thought it sounded just fine. I wonder if Brian and Roger are even aware of this.. ? |
| Oscar J 11.08.2014 15:13 |
Yes, that's the most obvious one. I'm also interested in how involved they are. From what I've heard hey've been doing loads of overdubs and stuff for earlier concert releases, so I guess it isn't that big of a stretch for them to allow the sound engineers to do some auto tune. |
| Rick 11.08.2014 15:33 |
Killer Queen is hugely overdubbed :( |
| dysan 12.08.2014 04:13 |
We can only guess why the original release plan was shelved. We know the tracks were overdubbed for release and perhaps the effort involved to get it up to scratch was seen as too much (more than the anticipated fixing and mixing) as they were obviously a new band who's efforts were better spent getting a 'proper' 3rd album out. I expect to polish it up for release in 2014 they have felt it's fine to use 2014 methods such as autotune rather than using the overdubs. No problems here. Perhaps Live Killers wouldn't have so many edits if they had autotune in '79. That said, I also don't have any problem with the edits in Live Killers or Live Magic. |
| Mrmarioanonym 12.08.2014 09:54 |
the delay ould be fine with me if they'd overhaul it. otherwise no buy. that's just too much autotune and flying in. it actually impacts my enjoyment. |
| Oscar J 12.08.2014 09:57 |
What delay? It's delayed? :( |
| MercurialFreddie 17.08.2014 17:53 |
No it's not ! You can now download Killer Queen for free from the Queenonline website. It sounds "more" live than Box of tricks version. |
| alberbal12 18.08.2014 10:46 |
Whatever it sounds, it is an incredibly song, most if we say that is the 1st time we hear it!!! Long live Queen!!! |
| BETA215 18.08.2014 17:12 |
inu-liger wrote: Here's a better quality rip of the iTunes preview stream, with liberties taken to de-fade in/out so you can better hear the a cappella bit :) How do you do that? What program and what effect do you use? I'm trying to de-fade in/out all the Amazon samples and the iTunes samples to merge it, but I can't de-fade in/out them. I'm using Adobe Audition. |
| The Real Wizard 19.08.2014 14:59 |
Select the first second of audio and double the volume, then fade the segment out to 50%. Repeat as necessary. Just be careful not to cause clipping. The best way to deal with that is to bring the entire thing down to 50% before starting. |
| BETA215 31.08.2014 17:02 |
Here you have a mix created by me of the iTunes sample and the Amazon sample. link |
| inu-liger 01.09.2014 15:16 |
Nice! |