A Word In Your Ear 18.05.2014 17:07 |
I have to say after just watch this documentary that I has highly please to see something new. The Footage of 17 year old Freddie at College was great. Also loved Brian's Acoustic Riffs for "Keep Your Self Alive" & "Stone Cold Crazy" I wonder if there's a demo for the original arrangement of "Stone Cold Crazy" I thought it sounded interesting. |
aber 18.05.2014 17:19 |
link |
Stelios 18.05.2014 17:25 |
Is there a way to watch it? I live in Grecce so itv is not accesible. (Or i am doing something wrong...) |
Holly2003 18.05.2014 17:27 |
So now we know what Stone Cold Crazy sounded like originally. Nice. Pleasantly surprised how good this documentary is. Usually music documenaties shown on ITV are rubbish. |
Marknow 18.05.2014 17:31 |
Stelios wrote: Is there a way to watch it? I live in Grecce so itv is not accesible. (Or i am doing something wrong...) Use this link it's free and it will give you a British I.P so u can watch ITV & BBC etc online. Just turn it off after you use it to return to your default internet settings. If you have hotspot shield you will need to uninstall that first or else expatsheld wont work. |
dave76 18.05.2014 17:32 |
I missed it though. It must be one awesome documentary. Maybe even better than the great pretender. Lots of footage of young Freddie. |
Stelios 18.05.2014 18:02 |
Marknow wrote:Stelios wrote: Is there a way to watch it? I live in Grecce so itv is not accesible. (Or i am doing something wrong...)Use this http://www.expatshield.com/ it's free and it will give you a British I.P so u can watch ITV & BBC etc online. Just turn it off after you use it to return to your default internet settings. If you have hotspot shield you will need to uninstall that first or else expatsheld wont work. Thanks. I installed it but still wants my postcode to confirm. Is there a specific postcode that should i type? |
Queenfansunite 18.05.2014 18:49 |
Probably the best new documentary on Freddie in recent times. I actually enjoyed it more than the Great Pretender one, as it seemed to reflect and capture his greatness in a far more personal and intimate way than the other recent doc. plus it left you satisfied and not over dosed by the same old footage and quotes. it managed to truly make a showcase of Live Aid for once in the right way, by having the Bob Geldof in sole focus and allowing him just the right amount of time to talk about how great a performance he and Queen gave. Plus I was very pleased to see that Montserrat looks so well and doesn't she look young! I could see some of Freddie's personality in his mother also who also looks well and what a lovely pair of blue fur trees his sister has, gorgeous trees and house. |
Stelios 18.05.2014 23:33 |
I just finished watching it. Its great. Highly recomended for various reasons. For anyone like me who cant have access to ITV there is a torrent already uploaded with decent quality. link Enjoy ! |
The Real Wizard 19.05.2014 01:24 |
link Here too. So are these the guys who sold off the footage and kept the originals ? |
Sebastian 19.05.2014 02:12 |
Extraordinary. |
andyb1968 19.05.2014 02:19 |
Excellent documentary, it does underline that there must be a lot of unseen footage still out there ! I maintain the Torpedo Twins must have a lot. |
rocknrolllover 19.05.2014 03:44 |
Great. Perhaps this is the only documentary, where so few was told about his non-traditional sexual orientation. focused more on his musical basis. it is wonderful to see rare previously unseen footage of young Freddie. |
kosimodo 19.05.2014 08:30 |
and on youtube... link |
Queenfansunite 19.05.2014 08:58 |
rocknrolllover wrote: Great. Perhaps this is the only documentary, where so few was told about his non-traditional sexual orientation. focused more on his musical basis. it is wonderful to see rare previously unseen footage of young Freddie.Yes, showcases his talent musicianship as should be so. The creative GENIOUS of his own artistic invention , and his stage exploits are enough sexual energy to convey him as the great star. It's better than being a constant homosexual promo which he did not want anyway. His private bedroom was private, and being gay is not a talent nor is it the making of a star. There is only one Freddie Mercury after all. How refreshing! Who would have thought it? I resent totally this gay thing, using him as a piggyback purely for a empty label of sex preference. Always was bullshit that. |
rocknrolllover 19.05.2014 09:14 |
QQueenfansunite wrote:He's greatest musician without any doubt .rocknrolllover wrote: Great. Perhaps this is the only documentary, where so few was told about his non-traditional sexual orientation. focused more on his musical basis. it is wonderful to see rare previously unseen footage of young Freddie.Yes, showcases his talent musicianship as should be so. The stage exploits are enough sexual energy to convey him as a star. It's better than being a constant homosexual promo which he did not want anyway. His private bedroom was private, and being gay is not a talent nor is it the making of a star. There is only one Freddie Mercury after all. How refreshing! Who would have thought it? If somebody has doubt on this count, i can say as was wrote in one newspaper in 1977 if I'm not mistaken "IS THIS MAN A PRAT?" |
Queenfansunite 19.05.2014 10:28 |
The PRATTS prat attack Yes and they were attacking Freddie as an easy target because of his brilliant colourful image and act that he used to great effect in his interviews with those Morgans. Nowadays such a blatant anti gay attack would be out of the question, but now they have it like sexism Against women. They use Freddie as a gay sexual icon, which is degrading and exploitation.and it is sexist! Two extremes, both wrong. Homophobic dismissal of his brilliant creative persona calling it prat like and then heteromesuxlaisation idol worship of the gay angle which is political sexism. Freddie was a individual and didn't ride anyone's boat to his creative ideas success or presentation of himself , he wasn't into " gay " rights. He was an entertainer as far as his extrovert- ness goes, and he used it and so brilliantly used it .and they hated his command of the public and his style because it was so far removed from their wannabe rock star ideals. But his musicianship and vocal brilliance they jealous of, because they were wanna be rock stars those failed journo's ' s at NME etc. And , just like Brian says, Queen were not about dirty jean long hairs playing guitars with heads down, and that's what the PRATTS did not like, they preferred the idea of punk because they couldn't play instruments either so wanted to promote that idea. PRATTS! |
Marknow 19.05.2014 13:52 |
Stelios wrote:Marknow wrote:Thanks. I installed it but still wants my postcode to confirm. Is there a specific postcode that should i type?Stelios wrote: Is there a way to watch it? I live in Grecce so itv is not accesible. (Or i am doing something wrong...)Use this http://www.expatshield.com/ it's free and it will give you a British I.P so u can watch ITV & BBC etc online. Just turn it off after you use it to return to your default internet settings. If you have hotspot shield you will need to uninstall that first or else expatsheld wont work. Put in any London postcode. |
FreddieCat 19.05.2014 14:00 |
The Real Wizard wrote: link Here too. So are these the guys who sold off the footage and kept the originals ?Thank you so much for the youtube version. I loved this and learned so much. So appreciated! |
Stelios 19.05.2014 14:58 |
Queenfansunite wrote: The PRATTS prat attack .... Homophobic dismissal of his brilliant creative persona calling it prat like and then heteromesuxlaisation idol worship of the gay angle which is political sexism. Freddie was a individual and didn't ride anyone's boat to his creative ideas success or presentation of himself , he wasn't into " gay " rights. PRATTS!What exactly do you mean by "heteromesuxlaisation idol worship of the gay angle " ? As for "he wasn't into " gay " rights" . Its true but it was a different era, he had personal struggles with his sexuality and to a digree ( after he became famous) he could afford not to care about " gay " rights. When "gay rights" became hot again with the HIV crisis, he was already infected and chose to channel all of his anguish ,sadness and (inevitable) anger into musical creativity. |
crazy duck 19.05.2014 15:11 |
|
crazy duck 19.05.2014 15:15 |
crazy duck wrote: Great documentary! Unseen footage was interesting. Not sure about alfie boe singing as it sounds the same as him talking but more shouty! But other than that I thought he did a great job. You can tell he likes queen! |
inu-liger 19.05.2014 15:40 |
Very interesting to hear the bit of Mother Love around the 47:00 mark without the final "Mother Love" whisper. Caught me off guard there. |
ANAGRAMER 19.05.2014 15:48 |
inu-liger wrote: Very interesting to hear the bit of Mother Love around the 47:00 mark without the final "Mother Love" whisper. Caught me off guard there.Yeah. Me too. Was close..... |
mooghead 19.05.2014 18:09 |
The worst thing about the Alfie Boe documentary was Alfie Boe. Who thinks that singing a song 3 thousand octaves below how it should be sung is a good thing? |
Mr.QueenFan 19.05.2014 18:27 |
This is a great documentary! The new footage was great, and Alfie did a wonderful job. Some great pipes he has, and he was very respectful towards Freddie. This documentary is right there with the "Days of Our lives" and "The great pretender". Brian playing "Stone cold crazy" was great. I'm very happy with this. Just excellent! |
dave76 19.05.2014 18:27 |
At least he gave us this wonderfull documentary otherwise we didn't got to see a 17 year old Farrokh waving. |
Iron Butterfly 19.05.2014 22:17 |
FreddieCat wrote:It was such a great programme. It did Freddie justice IMO, lots of insights. TV on this side of the pond, take note...this is how it's done.The Real Wizard wrote: link Here too. So are these the guys who sold off the footage and kept the originals ?Thank you so much for the youtube version. I loved this and learned so much. So appreciated! |
matt z 20.05.2014 03:21 |
Thoroughly enjoyed it. My only problem was I'd never heard of the guy (not Freddie, the OTHER ONE) Seemed part promotion, part fanship, part documentary. All in all this short film was a better credit to "discovering" Freddie than it's predecessor the great pretender. Especially loved the focus given to collaborators Mike Moran, Brian May, Montserrat, and Mack. A welcome change from the almost salacious great pretender that focused on his hedonism rather than his art. Imho, much of that really truly belonged on "the days of our lives" documentary. Far too short and repetitive to warrant purchase. Even the extras fell short. Thank you posters for bringing this to my attention. (Stateside) |
Costa86 20.05.2014 05:15 |
I agree this was a good programme. My favourite parts were seeing a teenage shy Freddie, and listening to Freddie and Monserrat fooling around in the studio. It was also entertaining to listen to Bob Geldof saying that Freddie can't possibly be called a good-looking man, and that all the Queen guys looked "weird". I can't say I agree with him though. I think Freddie WAS good-looking, at least in the 1980s (he did look somewhat ugly in the 1970s), and I don't think Queen as a whole looked any more peculiar than any other band. And Freddie's style on stage was super cool. Geldof did a lot of good for the world, and he's been through hell (and is still going through it, unfortunately, with the latest tragedy). But he's a bit of a shit. Kind of like Bono. |
crazy duck 20.05.2014 09:00 |
Its a shame that this documentary that seems to have temporarily quenched our thirst was not offerd to us by queen! Why cant they just give us something!!!!!!!!! |
k-m 20.05.2014 16:46 |
A very good programme indeed, but I wouldn't say better than "The Great Pretender" or "DOOL". It's certainly different, because it's very intimate and subjective, Mercury's genius and persona seen through the eyes of an opera singer and a long time fan. Very refreshing take for us, fans, but I don't think it would be as compelling for a non-fan. Also, it has some proper gems in it (Freddie at 17, Brian's acoustic SCC, new interviews). Well done indeed. |
Queenfansunite 20.05.2014 18:13 |
Stelios wrote:Metrosexualisation I meantQueenfansunite wrote: The PRATTS prat attack .... Homophobic dismissal of his brilliant creative persona calling it prat like and then heteromesuxlaisation idol worship of the gay angle which is political sexism. Freddie was a individual and didn't ride anyone's boat to his creative ideas success or presentation of himself , he wasn't into " gay " rights. PRATTS!What exactly do you mean by "heteromesuxlaisation idol worship of the gay angle " ? As for "he wasn't into " gay " rights" . Its true but it was a different era, he had personal struggles with his sexuality and to a digree ( after he became famous) he could afford not to care about " gay " rights. When "gay rights" became hot again with the HIV crisis, he was already infected and chose to channel all of his anguish ,sadness and (inevitable) anger into musical creativity. I mean it's all politics, back then it was cool to laugh at gay people, and that article was a cloaked attack on Freddie a s a gay type of entertainer , but Freddie , he used all his imagination in order to present a entertaining personality, in his music, his stage show and even in his interviews. But now, it politics again, I mean they cannot do that today, because of politics again, it's all politics. And as for HIV, it is politics also, as is AIDS, it's politics and the greatest crime against humanity in recent human history. lIke you said , Freddie's response was to finish his great work as a amazingly talented musician. it was NOT politics or gay rights, because as far as Freddie was concerned GAY as a problem had been solved in regards to politics in 1967' as IT had already been given IT'S rights in 1967. End of And now they idolise the gay politics they have created. They have to or they get the sack. But it was refreshing that this documentary did not do that , and instead allowed Freddie's talent to the forefront, instead of the bogus parading of a gay identity meaning anything, when it doesn't, as that is for his private bedroom and is not a talent, but merely a sexual preference. |
Queenfansunite 20.05.2014 18:32 |
Costa86 wrote: I agree this was a good programme. My favourite parts were seeing a teenage shy Freddie, and listening to Freddie and Monserrat fooling around in the studio. It was also entertaining to listen to Bob Geldof saying that Freddie can't possibly be called a good-looking man, and that all the Queen guys looked "weird". I can't say I agree with him though. I think Freddie WAS good-looking, at least in the 1980s (he did look somewhat ugly in the 1970s), and I don't think Queen as a whole looked any more peculiar than any other band. And Freddie's style on stage was super cool. Geldof did a lot of good for the world, and he's been through hell (and is still going through it, unfortunately, with the latest tragedy). But he's a bit of a shit. Kind of like Bono.Yes I agree, Freddie was very very handsome. Some times looked rough though in the 70's because of terrible photography and sweat, but we get to see all the photos nowadays, but there was a time you did not see the poorer ones. But Some show how handsome he was back then with long hair. But he was very handsome and more , had probably the greatest charisma of ANY Rock Star ever, More even than ELVIS I would say. I am sure everyone agrees with that. Maybe he and Elvis were equals in the charisma department. I may be going overboard on that, but definitely he WAS equal to him. When I see him on tv I say its Freddie bloody Mercury! In amazement . I can't get over how amazing he was! |
Stelios 22.05.2014 06:05 |
Queenfansunite wrote: Metrosexualisation I meant I mean it's all politics, back then it was cool to laugh at gay people, and that article was a cloaked attack on Freddie a s a gay type of entertainer , but Freddie , he used all his imagination in order to present a entertaining personality, in his music, his stage show and even in his interviews. But now, it politics again, I mean they cannot do that today, because of politics again, it's all politics. And as for HIV, it is politics also, as is AIDS, it's politics and the greatest crime against humanity in recent human history. lIke you said , Freddie's response was to finish his great work as a amazingly talented musician. it was NOT politics or gay rights, because as far as Freddie was concerned GAY as a problem had been solved in regards to politics in 1967' as IT had already been given IT'S rights in 1967. End of And now they idolise the gay politics they have created. They have to or they get the sack. But it was refreshing that this documentary did not do that , and instead allowed Freddie's talent to the forefront, instead of the bogus parading of a gay identity meaning anything, when it doesn't, as that is for his private bedroom and is not a talent, but merely a sexual preference. on " to laugh at gay people" Freddie himshelf was not that politically corect in that concept. Yesterday i listened the Osaka live booklet were he introduced Elton John as "a famous poofter". In the making of video of Breakthrough you can hear him calling someone fag. Of course its not the same but shows he had a certain attitude towards this issues. Taking everything with a bit of salt. on "it was NOT politics or gay rights" True, but if the personal is also political ( a famous quote from the 70's i think) Freddie embodied those issues. On regards to gender identity he presented himshelf very fluid from camp/feminime to macho, underlying that gender is a form of expression and constraction NOT an identity written in stone. And this one shakes the very foundation of how society perceives genders. He may did it unconsciously but with such audacity and power that effected more the general subconsious than strickt political talking or theoritical analysis . He became the living proof of how male/female identity works and manifests itshelf without having to say one word. To a certain amount the same goes with sexuality. Barbara Valentine's and Mary Austin's roles in his life blured the perception of what is and what is not a gay man. on "And now they idolise the gay politics they have created" This is a given. Every oppresed minority that achieved some form or tottal liberation has to celebrate the milestone. It's human nature. Perhaps sometimes is overbearing and off putting but remember that they also celebrate the lives of those who have been lost bue to the oppression. Its a very charged concept becouse it even touches matters of life or death and not necessarily in the past. Hate crimes are very evident today also. Look at Russia for example. |
Queenfansunite 22.05.2014 10:33 |
Stelios wrote:That's a given. I don't believe in hate crimes, and this the problem. if someone is murdered or beaten up, the motive is irrelevant and should only be used to prove the culprit if needed.Queenfansunite wrote: Metrosexualisation I meant I mean it's all politics, back then it was cool to laugh at gay people, and that article was a cloaked attack on Freddie a s a gay type of entertainer , but Freddie , he used all his imagination in order to present a entertaining personality, in his music, his stage show and even in his interviews. But now, it politics again, I mean they cannot do that today, because of politics again, it's all politics. And as for HIV, it is politics also, as is AIDS, it's politics and the greatest crime against humanity in recent human history. lIke you said , Freddie's response was to finish his great work as a amazingly talented musician. it was NOT politics or gay rights, because as far as Freddie was concerned GAY as a problem had been solved in regards to politics in 1967' as IT had already been given IT'S rights in 1967. End of And now they idolise the gay politics they have created. They have to or they get the sack. But it was refreshing that this documentary did not do that , and instead allowed Freddie's talent to the forefront, instead of the bogus parading of a gay identity meaning anything, when it doesn't, as that is for his private bedroom and is not a talent, but merely a sexual preference.on " to laugh at gay people" Freddie himshelf was not that politically corect in that concept. Yesterday i listened the Osaka live booklet were he introduced Elton John as "a famous poofter". In the making of video of Breakthrough you can hear him calling someone fag. Of course its not the same but shows he had a certain attitude towards this issues. Taking everything with a bit of salt. on "it was NOT politics or gay rights" True, but if the personal is also political ( a famous quote from the 70's i think) Freddie embodied those issues. On regards to gender identity he presented himshelf very fluid from camp/feminime to macho, underlying that gender is a form of expression and constraction NOT an identity written in stone. And this one shakes the very foundation of how society perceives genders. He may did it unconsciously but with such audacity and power that effected more the general subconsious than strickt political talking or theoritical analysis . He became the living proof of how male/female identity works and manifests itshelf without having to say one word. To a certain amount the same goes with sexuality. Barbara Valentine's and Mary Austin's roles in his life blured the perception of what is and what is not a gay man. on "And now they idolise the gay politics they have created" This is a given. Every oppresed minority that achieved some form or tottal liberation has to celebrate the milestone. It's human nature. Perhaps sometimes is overbearing and off putting but remember that they also celebrate the lives of those who have been lost bue to the oppression. Its a very charged concept becouse it even touches matters of life or death and not necessarily in the past. Hate crimes are very evident today also. Look at Russia for example. Calling something a hate crime is political If someone beats someone up or worse murders them the motive is irrelevant , it's still assault or murder. This is why is say its politics this gay thing is all politics. To give a reason for the culprit beating somebody up as hate crime is like giving a justification of excuse! It's REDICULOUS and flies in the face of equality under the law and makes it special, when it isn't special, murder is murder and assault is assault The reasons behind why the crime is committed does not make it ANY different. You cannot be truly fighting for a equality when you have equality in the law anyway. It's flogging a dead horse. In England in 1967 homosexuality was made legal for those over the age of 21. That suited Freddie fine, and is enough is it not? What else is there other than calling people names and acting superior and judging others? But a crime is a crime it is not a "hate crime" that is bullshit and its politics. |
dragonfly.trumpeter 61319 25.05.2014 17:48 |
inu-liger "hopefully we can get this garbage removed" Well the United States of Government are working on this issue, and Canary Wharf and in particular, 8, Canada Square E14 is the first target but there are many others in Zone 2 and Zone 1 of London. Graham David Bruton |