| Mr.QueenFan 07.02.2014 16:49 |
I just read this article: link In it Brian says: "When I hear Freddie's voice coming off the recording, it's 35 years ago but it feels as if it was yesterday, and he's full of beans and naughtiness. It's a joy." I mean, "The works" was 30 years ago, so maybe Brian had been working on a track by the Game sessions (35 years ago)? We will find out later this year, but until then it's good to speculate about everything they say or write:-) |
| Hangman_96 08.02.2014 00:42 |
He could be talking about two different tracks. |
| rocknrolllover 08.02.2014 01:42 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote: I just read this article: link In it Brian says: "When I hear Freddie's voice coming off the recording, it's 35 years ago but it feels as if it was yesterday, and he's full of beans and naughtiness. It's a joy." I mean, "The works" was 30 years ago, so maybe Brian had been working on a track by the Game sessions (35 years ago)? We will find out later this year, but until then it's good to speculate about everything they say or write:-)35 years ago is 1979. June-July The Game sessions. |
| thomasquinn 32989 08.02.2014 05:19 |
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82. |
| Stick 08.02.2014 05:27 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.You didn't recognize the flaming autism in his previous posts? |
| jacksonmerc 08.02.2014 06:05 |
Perhaps it was a figure used to throw us off the scent completely? |
| rocknrolllover 08.02.2014 07:09 |
Stick wrote:What are you talking about, stick?thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.You didn't recognize the flaming autism in his previous posts? |
| rocknrolllover 08.02.2014 07:16 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.if you don't understand the meaning of the word "Assumption" is your personal problems. if you're implying that I'm stupid, moron, and a Troll. I assure you I am more than you could imagine, although you do not think. |
| Mr.QueenFan 08.02.2014 12:33 |
Lostman wrote: He could be talking about two different tracks.Yes, that is what i mean, sorry if i wasn't too precise. We already know that he worked on a track by "The works" sessions or so, but reading this i got the impression that one of the tracks was late 70's early 80's. We know that there are at least 3 new unheard songs, and 35 years to me sounds more like a song from "The Game"or even "Hot Space" than from "The works", witch can imply that Brian had been working on two different songs at he same time. Of course i'm aware that 35 can mean 36 or 33, but in this case i'm taking the liberty to believe that it's not from "The Works" sessions, that was more my point that it being from "The Game" sessions. But it gave a great title for my topic:-) |
| Hangman_96 08.02.2014 14:02 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote:My thoughts exactly.Lostman wrote: He could be talking about two different tracks.Yes, that is what i mean, sorry if i wasn't too precise. We already know that he worked on a track by "The works" sessions or so, but reading this i got the impression that one of the tracks was late 70's early 80's. We know that there are at least 3 new unheard songs, and 35 years to me sounds more like a song from "The Game"or even "Hot Space" than from "The works", witch can imply that Brian had been working on two different songs at he same time. Of course i'm aware that 35 can mean 36 or 33, but in this case i'm taking the liberty to believe that it's not from "The Works" sessions, that was more my point that it being from "The Game" sessions. But it gave a great title for my topic:-) I once heard that they recorded a bunch of songs during the The Game sessions. This rumour might have turned out false sometime later though, I just don't remember. But they certainly do have more tracks than we can even imagine! To have them all released would just be a luxury, but it's only just a dream! However, knowing that at least something is going to be given the right treatment, it warms me up a bit. |
| brENsKi 09.02.2014 04:29 |
rocknrolllover wrote:thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.if you don't understand the meaning of the word "Assumption" is your personal problems. if you're implying that I'm stupid, moron, and a Troll. I assure you I am more than you could imagine, although you do not think. MORE than we could IMAGINE ????? is that possible? by all accounts that would make you VERY STUPID, a HUGE MORON and a MASSIVE TROLL. Ok you said it. So we're forced to accept ALL of the above. |
| rocknrolllover 09.02.2014 06:18 |
brENsKi wrote:Lol! All that you're saying is outright bullshit!rocknrolllover wrote:MORE than we could IMAGINE ????? is that possible? by all accounts that would make you VERY STUPID, a HUGE MORON and a MASSIVE TROLL. Ok you said it. So we're forced to accept ALL of the above.thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.if you don't understand the meaning of the word "Assumption" is your personal problems. if you're implying that I'm stupid, moron, and a Troll. I assure you I am more than you could imagine, although you do not think. I am not a troll, I am not a moron an I am not a massive troll. If I am a troll and you are a troll too. Yes yes, you are a troll. |
| Stick 09.02.2014 08:19 |
rocknrolllover wrote: Lol! All that you're saying is outright bullshit! I am not a troll, I am not a moron an I am not a massive troll. If I am a troll and you are a troll too. Yes yes, you are a troll.Flaming autism. Nothing more, nothing less. |
| rocknrolllover 09.02.2014 10:19 |
Stick wrote:Please stop stink and trollingrocknrolllover wrote: Lol! All that you're saying is outright bullshit! I am not a troll, I am not a moron an I am not a massive troll. If I am a troll and you are a troll too. Yes yes, you are a troll.Flaming autism. Nothing more, nothing less. |
| Thistle 09.02.2014 11:42 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.You may be right, Thomas, but I don't really agree with those thoughts - when I say something was 20 years ago, I mean it was 20 years ago. If I'm not sure, or estimating, I'd say "roughly 20 years ago". Perhaps Brian said 35 years because he knows it was 35 years? If so, then it would place it in "The Game" era. It may just be an estimation - only Brian knows, as he'll have the recording dates in front of him. |
| rocknrolllover 09.02.2014 22:38 |
Wait and see. Need to wait for official announcements, rather than guessing on a coffee thick! |
| thomasquinn 32989 10.02.2014 05:41 |
Walter White wrote:It is possible that he meant exactly 35 years ago, that's why I didn't rule out '79. However, based on the information available we cannot conclude that he definitely meant an exact time-span. Another problem is that we get the quote from a second-hand source: quotations are often modified slightly, intentionally or unintentionally, to fit the flow of an article, so for all we know there might have been an "about" just before "35 years ago" - we don't have a recording or a direct transcript available.thomasquinn 32989 wrote: It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.You may be right, Thomas, but I don't really agree with those thoughts - when I say something was 20 years ago, I mean it was 20 years ago. If I'm not sure, or estimating, I'd say "roughly 20 years ago". Perhaps Brian said 35 years because he knows it was 35 years? If so, then it would place it in "The Game" era. It may just be an estimation - only Brian knows, as he'll have the recording dates in front of him. Bottom line: I do not mean to say that Brian *didn't* mean exactly 35 years ago, but that we don't have enough information to pinpoint an exact date. Therefore, I do not wish to jump to the conclusion that a new track is from the "The Game"-sessions. I could easily see it being from either the "Jazz" or "Hot Space" sessions, maybe even "News Of The World". |
| Opunium 13.02.2014 07:01 |
Tough 35 years ago do actually mean about 35 years ago it could actually be from The Game session. The Game was recorded in 1979 with more general Queen 70's sound that could have fit on any album from the 75-78 period while the sessions from early 1980 feature more syntheziser songs, as they broke with their No Synth rule. Maybe one the original songs from the 79 session which got dumped after the synth came in is now being reworked by Brian. |
| thomasquinn 32989 13.02.2014 13:06 |
Opunium wrote: Tough 35 years ago do actually mean about 35 years ago it could actually be from The Game session. The Game was recorded in 1979 with more general Queen 70's sound that could have fit on any album from the 75-78 period while the sessions from early 1980 feature more syntheziser songs, as they broke with their No Synth rule. Maybe one the original songs from the 79 session which got dumped after the synth came in is now being reworked by Brian.Maybe, maybe not. There is no evidence for anything you postulated from what Brian said - because Brian was (deliberately?) extremely vague. |
| Martin Packer 13.02.2014 14:09 |
A divisible-by-5 number is vaguer than a divisible-by-1. Divisible-by-10 numbers even more so. |