4 x Vision 15.10.2009 09:45 |
Seb brought up an interesting point for me in his SMGO myth/truth topic. He said that "It's got both human bass and human drums (a rarity for the era)". This saddened me a bit, but got me thinking... If Freddie was indeed getting sicker and making less frequent studio visits, and if they used more technological bass, drums... which Brian and Freddie could both use very well... what use were Roger and John in the studio with Miracle, innuendo and MIH albums? (obviously wasn't any Queen live after Magic). I'm aware they did write some songs, but in the editing was Brian more involved in the finished product? (I'm aware they put all songs under the banner of Queen, but we all know who wrote what now). Was Brian more relied upon to edit material or make the bigger decisions with songs... even not his own? IMO, these albums do instantly have that Brian solo material feel to them. Am I right in saying he took over the MIH sessions after he didn't like what John and Roger where doing? I ask this not to criticise John or Roger, I'm just interested in how much each played in the later stages and if Brian did kind of become Team Leader in the studio??? |
Sebastian 15.10.2009 12:38 |
Absolutely not: songwriting was still dominated by Freddie, and both Roger and John contributed a lot to production as well as programming, not to mention lyrics. So, Queen was NEVER Brian, just like Queen was NEVER Freddie. Let's see track by track: Party: Songwriting-wise it's more Fred; playing-wise it's got more input from John (bass+rhythm) and Fred (piano+programming). Vocal-wise Fred dominates both lead and harmonies (though both B&R sing as well). So: it wasn't mainly Brian at all. Khashoggi's Ship: Pretty much 25-25-25-25. So: it was not mainly Brian. The Miracle: Songwriting's dominated by Fred; most instruments (piano+synth+samplers) are by Fred too; most vocals (almost all, actually) are Fred too. So: it was NOT mainly Brian. I Want It All: Songwriting's by May; most instruments by May; vocals are mostly May (most harmonies plus some lead). So yes, this one is. Invisible Man: Songwriting's Rog; most instruments by Rog (human drums, some programming); vocals are mostly Taylor (most harmonies plus some lead). So: NOT mainly Brian. Breakthru: Same as Invisible Man. Drums are at least partly programmed, but Brian's got nothing to do with it. So: NOT mainly Brian. Rain Must Fall: Songwriting's F&J; most instruments by Deacon (human bass, programming, synths and maybe some rhythm guitar); vocals are all Fred. So: NOT mainly Brian. Scandal: Written by May; all instruments except for (human, btw) bass and drums by May; vocals are all Fred. So yes, this one IS mainly Brian. My Baby Does Me: Written by F&J; most instruments by Deacy; most vocals by Fred (though Bri does sing some harmonies). But still: NOT mainly Brian. Was It All Worth It: Written by F; most instruments by F (loads and loads of synths); most vocals by Fred (the others join in the end, mostly). So: NOT mainly Brian. Innuendo: Written by F&R; most instruments by F (loads of synths); most vocals by Fred. So: NOT mainly Brian. Slightly Mad: Written by F; most instruments by F (piano, synth & programming); most vocals by Fred (though there are some by B). Still, NOT mainly Brian. Headlong: Written by B; most instruments by B (including programming); most vocals by Brian (most harmonies). So yes, this one IS mainly Brian. I Can't Live With You: Ditto. Ride the Wild Wind: Written by R; most instruments by R (including human drums & programming); vocals are a duet between F&R. So: NOT mainly Brian. All God's People: Written by F&M; most instruments by Mike (piano, synths & programming); vocals are mostly F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Days of Our Lives: Written by R; programming by all five (inc. D); vocals are all F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Delilah: Written by F; most instruments (piano, synth & programming) by F; all vocals by F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Don't Try So Hard: Written by F; all four played instruments in a more or less equal amount; vocals mostly F. So: NOT mainly Brian. The Hitman: Written by F, arranged by B&J; all four played instruments in a more or less equal amount; vocals feature both F&B. So: NOT mainly Brian (though he did contribute a lot). Bijou: Vocal lines by B; guitar lines by F; keyboard bits by F; title by F; instruments 50-50; vocals by F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Show Must Go On: Music by J&R; lyrics & melody by B; instruments mostly B (keys+guitars); vocals mostly by F&B (B on most harmonies). So yes: this one IS manly Brian. You Don't Fool Me: Credited either to F&R or F&J so... Brian's the one who contributed THE LEAST, not THE MOST. Winter's Tale: Written by F; most instruments by F; vocals are more or less balanced (F on lead, B&R on backing); So: it was NOT mainly Brian. Mother Love: Written by F&B; most instruments by B (keys, guitars & programming); vocals are more F than B. So: yes, it WAS mainly Brian. So we've got 25 songs written, recorded and released in albums after 'Magic'. Only 6 of them were dominated by Brian (24%, almost exactly the 1/4 each member represents). Conclusion: late era Q was ABSOLUTELY NOT mainly Brian. Only two Queen albums had Dr May as 'team leader', and those were 'News of the World' and 'Flash Gordon'. For the remaining 90% of the band history, Brian was NOT a dominating force. As for deciding on mixing et al, they kept the usual way: the author's got his way. So, for 76% of the songs, Brian was NOT the dominating force when it came to making decisions, etc. About 'MIH', the very hard task of re-arranging and recording was taken EQUALLY by the three surviving members. It was 1/3 by B, 1/3 by R, 1/3 by J. |
john bodega 15.10.2009 14:48 |
Even so, this is a topic that can only be discussed using averages at best. The minutiae of songwriting and being in a band is something that outsiders really can't list after the fact. MIH for example, was done in equal measures by the 3 guys (and Dave Richards), but it was Brian who came back from holiday (or touring, I can't remember which) to shitcan everything that John and Roger had done and basically start again. That's a pretty big call to make, and no doubt changed the album quite severely. Good fun, these topics! |
maxpower 15.10.2009 15:23 |
Who knows but my own take, Bri did slow down 1987-91; marriage problems, death of his father, the none touring didn't help, & telling the world Freddie was fine (when he wasn't) is going to make me not want to be too creative. Where as Freddie could simply pour himself into his work when he knew there would be no more touring & take care of himself as well as one could with HIV/AIDS, from 1987-91 |
4 x Vision 15.10.2009 18:08 |
Thank you Seb for your fantastic reply. Gives a very good insight and answers my question/s and then some! I'm just browsing right now, but I've a day off tomorrow and looking forward to looking at your reply in more depth. Also, I wonder how different MIH would have been under John and Roger having more of an influence instead of Brian. Zeb, do we know to the extent in which Brian re-did what J + R had done with these songs... did he really start them all from scratch? What a kick in the nuts if he did lol |
Vali 16.10.2009 05:45 |
Van Basten 9 wrote: Zeb, do we know to the extent in which Brian re-did what J + R had done with these songs... did he really start them all from scratch? What a kick in the nuts if he did lol Yes, I read Brian talking about this in his Soapbox and I went thinking: "wow, and didn't Roger and John try to protect their work? did they simply allow you re-working the job they had done without ... any resistance?" Has anyone further details to provide on this subject? Sebastian? I die for another of your brilliant+informative posts :) |
rschoorl 16.10.2009 07:14 |
Great topic. I was unaware that Brian had reworked MIH, I certainly wonder where Roger and John came out on all that. I'm also curious about the statement that Brian was the "team leader" on News of the World. Could you provide more info related to that as it feels like the usual Freddie/Brian 40% mix with the Roger/John 10% mix of those days. |
Sebastian 16.10.2009 07:32 |
Studio leadership in those days was pretty simple: the writer's the owner and boss, and he's in charge of arrangements (doing all of them himself or delegating as he pleased), mixing and he produces as well. With that in mind: May wrote 4 songs for the album, Mercury wrote 3, Deacy and Taylor 2 each. So, Brian was the team leader for 36.36% of the tracks, Mercury for 27.27% and the others for 18.18% each. For 'Flash'... well, you know the story. |
mike hunt 16.10.2009 10:44 |
Sebastian wrote: Absolutely not: songwriting was still dominated by Freddie, and both Roger and John contributed a lot to production as well as programming, not to mention lyrics. So, Queen was NEVER Brian, just like Queen was NEVER Freddie. Let's see track by track: Party: Songwriting-wise it's more Fred; playing-wise it's got more input from John (bass+rhythm) and Fred (piano+programming). Vocal-wise Fred dominates both lead and harmonies (though both B&R sing as well). So: it wasn't mainly Brian at all. Khashoggi's Ship: Pretty much 25-25-25-25. So: it was not mainly Brian. The Miracle: Songwriting's dominated by Fred; most instruments (piano+synth+samplers) are by Fred too; most vocals (almost all, actually) are Fred too. So: it was NOT mainly Brian. I Want It All: Songwriting's by May; most instruments by May; vocals are mostly May (most harmonies plus some lead). So yes, this one is. Invisible Man: Songwriting's Rog; most instruments by Rog (human drums, some programming); vocals are mostly Taylor (most harmonies plus some lead). So: NOT mainly Brian. Breakthru: Same as Invisible Man. Drums are at least partly programmed, but Brian's got nothing to do with it. So: NOT mainly Brian. Rain Must Fall: Songwriting's F&J; most instruments by Deacon (human bass, programming, synths and maybe some rhythm guitar); vocals are all Fred. So: NOT mainly Brian. Scandal: Written by May; all instruments except for (human, btw) bass and drums by May; vocals are all Fred. So yes, this one IS mainly Brian. My Baby Does Me: Written by F&J; most instruments by Deacy; most vocals by Fred (though Bri does sing some harmonies). But still: NOT mainly Brian. Was It All Worth It: Written by F; most instruments by F (loads and loads of synths); most vocals by Fred (the others join in the end, mostly). So: NOT mainly Brian. Innuendo: Written by F&R; most instruments by F (loads of synths); most vocals by Fred. So: NOT mainly Brian. Slightly Mad: Written by F; most instruments by F (piano, synth & programming); most vocals by Fred (though there are some by B). Still, NOT mainly Brian. Headlong: Written by B; most instruments by B (including programming); most vocals by Brian (most harmonies). So yes, this one IS mainly Brian. I Can't Live With You: Ditto. Ride the Wild Wind: Written by R; most instruments by R (including human drums & programming); vocals are a duet between F&R. So: NOT mainly Brian. All God's People: Written by F&M; most instruments by Mike (piano, synths & programming); vocals are mostly F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Days of Our Lives: Written by R; programming by all five (inc. D); vocals are all F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Delilah: Written by F; most instruments (piano, synth & programming) by F; all vocals by F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Don't Try So Hard: Written by F; all four played instruments in a more or less equal amount; vocals mostly F. So: NOT mainly Brian. The Hitman: Written by F, arranged by B&J; all four played instruments in a more or less equal amount; vocals feature both F&B. So: NOT mainly Brian (though he did contribute a lot). Bijou: Vocal lines by B; guitar lines by F; keyboard bits by F; title by F; instruments 50-50; vocals by F. So: NOT mainly Brian. Show Must Go On: Music by J&R; lyrics & melody by B; instruments mostly B (keys+guitars); vocals mostly by F&B (B on most harmonies). So yes: this one IS manly Brian. You Don't Fool Me: Credited either to F&R or F&J so... Brian's the one who contributed THE LEAST, not THE MOST. Winter's Tale: Written by F; most instruments by F; vocals are more or less balanced (F on lead, B&R on backing); So: it was NOT mainly Brian. Mother Love: Written by F&B; most instruments by B (keys, guitars & programming); vocals are more F than B. So: yes, it WAS mainly Brian. So we've got 25 songs written, recorded and released in albums after 'Magic'. Only 6 of them were dominated by Brian (24%, almost exactly the 1/4 each member represents). Conclusion: late era Q was ABSOLUTELY NOT mainly Brian. Only two Queen albums had Dr May as 'team leader', and those were 'News of the World' and 'Flash Gordon'. For the remaining 90% of the band history, Brian was NOT a dominating force. As for deciding on mixing et al, they kept the usual way: the author's got his way. So, for 76% of the songs, Brian was NOT the dominating force when it came to making decisions, etc. About 'MIH', the very hard task of re-arranging and recording was taken EQUALLY by the three surviving members. It was 1/3 by B, 1/3 by R, 1/3 by J. Good Job Seb! |
August R. 16.10.2009 12:46 |
Sebastian wrote:
About 'MIH', the very hard task of re-arranging and recording was taken EQUALLY by the three surviving members. It was 1/3 by B, 1/3 by R, 1/3 by J.
And this claim is based on what?? |
4 x Vision 16.10.2009 13:39 |
What's interesting to me is the amount of synths, drum programming etc... which I know nothing about. To any musicians... would you find it obvious (without Seb's breakdown) to when such programming was employed over human playing? Where Queen making up for the fact they used "no synths" on earlier albums! |
Cwazy little thing 18.10.2009 09:58 |
Sebastian wrote: The Hitman: Written by F, arranged by B&J; all four played instruments in a more or less equal amount; vocals feature both F&B. So: NOT mainly Brian (though he did contribute a lot). Whilst I dont question the overall conclusion in the slightest, and happily admit I am far from qualified to call into question any of that very thorough post, I am nevertheless inclined to ask a question, haha: If Freddie wrote The Hitman, why is there a demo with Brian singing the lead vocal and doing all the backing vocals? |
john bodega 18.10.2009 10:28 |
Mmmm... my guess is that if Brian did more than a bit of rearranging, it would've been easier to do a guide vocal himself than to wait for a day when Freddie would be well enough to come in and work on the track. |
4 x Vision 18.10.2009 11:09 |
Cwazy little thing wrote:Sebastian wrote: The Hitman: Written by F, arranged by B&J; all four played instruments in a more or less equal amount; vocals feature both F&B. So: NOT mainly Brian (though he did contribute a lot).Whilst I dont question the overall conclusion in the slightest, and happily admit I am far from qualified to call into question any of that very thorough post, I am nevertheless inclined to ask a question, haha: If Freddie wrote The Hitman, why is there a demo with Brian singing the lead vocal and doing all the backing vocals? That's a funny one... i always thought it was Brian who wrote this too for the same reason... i.e The demo he sings in. Also got that rockier feel that I put down to Brian. |
Sebastian 18.10.2009 11:17 |
Freddie wrote the music, but not necessarily the lyrics. Here are some recurring themes: * Dr May sings the demo: True, BUT, it's a 1-minute demo. Even if it 'proved' he'd written those two verses (melody-wise and lyric-wise, including the 'shit' line that's not present in the final version), it does NOT mean, imply or suggest AT ALL that he created the remaining 81.756% of the song. * Dr May sings all backing vocals: Yes, so? While it was a frequent case to have the composer singing all BV's (e.g. Love of My Life, Tenement Funster, Leaving Home Ain't Easy), it is NOT an error-proof evidence (e.g. Scandal, Calling All Girls). * There'd never been a song written by Fred with the demo sung by somebody else before. Why would there be one then? Well, by that logic: Fred never died, because he hadn't died before. He wasn't born either... conclusion: there's a first time for everything. Considering his health and the fact they'd got some deadlines, it could happen that Bri stepped in to sing the 54-sec demo in order to keep the ball rolling. It does NOT mean or imply that he wrote the remaining 81.756% of the song, or that Fred had nothing to do with the music, lyrics or melody (of either that portion or the remaining 81.756% of the track). * Some people say that Fred MUST have written the lyrics because of 'hitman school' (similar to 'school of lover boys'). Well: is it physically impossible for somebody else to write those lyrics? By that logic, because John wrote 'you ('re my best friend)' in his song, it instantly became strictly forbidden for anybody else on the planet to write the word 'you'. Hence, all the songs, poems or scripts having 'you' MUST have been penned by John Deacon. Of course, in the case Fred in fact wrote those two words, it doesn't AT ALL imply, prove or suggest he wrote the remaining 99.0521% of the lyrics. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. Based on the existing data, both options are possible. |
mooghead 18.10.2009 13:09 |
"Some people say that Fred MUST have written the lyrics because of 'hitman school'" I'm sorry but no one has ever said that, you are making stuff up now to back up your speculation. |
12yrslouetta 18.10.2009 13:52 |
Interesting post. As an aside i was under the impression, or rather i thought i read somewhere that Roger and John had already started Made In Heaven as Brian was to busy, but when brian heard what they had done the only way he would get involved was if they started again with him at the helm. I was sure i read that. Of course i may have got that read. As an aside, its very difficult, damn near impossible to determine averages of who wrote what. For example (now this is stretching it a bit), what would my input be counted as if my only suggestion was, hey freddie you know what, we should put an opera section after brians solo" It may be just one suggestion but how could you determine an average on my participation?? |
Sebastian 18.10.2009 17:42 |
mooghead wrote: "Some people say that Fred MUST have written the lyrics because of 'hitman school'" I'm sorry but no one has ever said that, you are making stuff up now to back up your speculation. No one has ever said that? Sure.... because you know EVERYTHING EVERYONE HAS EVER SAID. NOTHING has EVER been said without YOU knowing it. It is you who are making stuff up now to back up your speculations about other people's speculations. |
Cwazy little thing 18.10.2009 18:20 |
Sebastian wrote: Freddie wrote the music, but not necessarily the lyrics. Here are some recurring themes: * Dr May sings the demo: True, BUT, it's a 1-minute demo. Even if it 'proved' he'd written those two verses (melody-wise and lyric-wise, including the 'shit' line that's not present in the final version), it does NOT mean, imply or suggest AT ALL that he created the remaining 81.756% of the song. * Dr May sings all backing vocals: Yes, so? While it was a frequent case to have the composer singing all BV's (e.g. Love of My Life, Tenement Funster, Leaving Home Ain't Easy), it is NOT an error-proof evidence (e.g. Scandal, Calling All Girls). * There'd never been a song written by Fred with the demo sung by somebody else before. Why would there be one then? Well, by that logic: Fred never died, because he hadn't died before. He wasn't born either... conclusion: there's a first time for everything. Considering his health and the fact they'd got some deadlines, it could happen that Bri stepped in to sing the 54-sec demo in order to keep the ball rolling. It does NOT mean or imply that he wrote the remaining 81.756% of the song, or that Fred had nothing to do with the music, lyrics or melody (of either that portion or the remaining 81.756% of the track). * Some people say that Fred MUST have written the lyrics because of 'hitman school' (similar to 'school of lover boys'). Well: is it physically impossible for somebody else to write those lyrics? By that logic, because John wrote 'you ('re my best friend)' in his song, it instantly became strictly forbidden for anybody else on the planet to write the word 'you'. Hence, all the songs, poems or scripts having 'you' MUST have been penned by John Deacon. Of course, in the case Fred in fact wrote those two words, it doesn't AT ALL imply, prove or suggest he wrote the remaining 99.0521% of the lyrics. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. Based on the existing data, both options are possible. I do agree with the suggestion that Brian might have demo'd the track because he'd worked on it in Freddie's absence and wanted to keep the ball rolling as it were, as that seems perfectly plausible, but can I flip this on its head for a second: Basically what you've done there ^ Seb is say that the evidence in favour of Brian writing the track (namely the fact he demo'd it, and that he sings the BV's) is circumstantial (I can also understand the poster above that thought it was Brian's due to it being a very heavy track). Ok, fair enough, but what is your evidence for it being a Freddie track? I dont mean that in any sort of "YOU MUST PROVE YOUSELF!" way - Im genuinely curious as Id just assumed it was Brian originated since I first heard Innuendo. Has one of the band said it was Freddie's at some point? |
Sebastian 18.10.2009 18:34 |
During a Sunset Strip interview made to Maylor in 1991, Brian commented that he wasn't even in the room when Fred wrote it (the riff). He then changed the key and some of the notes to make it playable on guitar, and later on John would reconstruct the track, changing the order and (whatever he meant by) 'everything'. While that's as much circumstantial evidence as the BV's and the 54-sec demo (and the fact it's heavy says nothing... remember Ogre Battle, Princes of the Universe, Let Me Entertain You or even Was It All Worth It?), it makes sense considering the song, arrangement aside, does fit Fred's style a lot more than Brian's if you look through it musically. Of course, none of that gives us any account on the melody, the lyrics and other details. We do know, of course, that Brian was heavily involved with it, but that can also be said about Freddie and Radio Ga Ga and the song is still Roger's, isn't it? Or George Martin and Yesterday, etc. What can be inferred from both interviews and song analysis is that The Hitman's got a very mixed approach, with all sans Roger having a lot to do with it at some point (unless, hypothetically, Roger contributed to the lyrics rather strongly, there's nothing to confirm or deny that), which still works for the point I'm making (i.e. late era Q was NOT mainly Brian). The topic's far from being finished or cleared, and I hope one year from now we can look back and think 'how little we knew about it, and how much there's still to research on'... that's the whole point of these threads IMO. |
GratefulFan 18.10.2009 19:21 |
I've always thought 'Hitman' to be a pefect and deliberate metaphor for AIDS in that song behing the song kind of way. For that reason I always imagined it to be lyrically led by Mercury with suggestions by the others. But what do I know. ;) I do know that for me, it's an outstanding track. |
Sebastian 18.10.2009 19:35 |
And you could easily be right, Grateful Fan. We do know it's definitely not 100% any of them, and we do know that it's definitely not one of the tracks Bri was doing for his solo album (those were Headlong and I Can't Live With You). |
Mr Butambul 19.10.2009 02:06 |
Blimey....i'm enjoying the read. |
Sebastian 19.10.2009 03:07 |
Mr Butambul wrote: Blimey....i'm enjoying the read. Gr8! So am I ;) |
4 x Vision 19.10.2009 07:35 |
Seb, with Freddie getting sicker at the end and spending less time in the studio... is their a chance Brian got to do more editing of ALL the final material (again M, I, and MIH) though... never mind who contributed what to each song as you've kindly brokedown? I'd argue throughout their career Brian and Freddie where still the two most intelligent and creative in the group (despite all their hits), and made best with all the songs put forward... so would it make sense that Brian possibly got more control over the material on how it finally sounded on the last 3 albums??? Now remember I'm only asking so be nice!!! |
Sebastian 19.10.2009 08:17 |
Fred only spent less time in the studio at the end. During Miracle and Innuendo, he spent MORE time in the studio as it's physically easier and less demanding to sit at a console and produce, than the whole touring, giving interviews, playing concerts that Maylor were doing. As David Richards commented, the only time he couldn't stay there and choose the tracks, direct the mixing and editing, etc... was on his final Winter's Tale session, when he simply left DR to do the job of picking the vocal lines and so on. So no: Brian was NOT the team leader (neither was Freddie), and late era Q was NOT mainly Brian (it was NOT mainly Freddie either). |
Pim Derks 19.10.2009 12:06 |
Interesting topic. Wonder what Roger and John recorded while Brian was on tour in 1993. Remember that Roger and John also performed as Queen that year and Roger even said in an interview that they were going to continue, with or without Brian. Would love to see a box dedicated to these sessions - but ofcourse nothing will ever be released.... |
The Real Wizard 19.10.2009 13:05 |
Sebastian wrote: During Miracle and Innuendo, he spent MORE time in the studio as it's physically easier and less demanding to sit at a console and produce, than the whole touring, giving interviews, playing concerts that Maylor were doing. That is indeed a logical conclusion to make, but it is not unequivocal proof of the proposition that "Fred only spent less time in the studio at the end," as you are stating it to be. If I may speak for mooghead for a brief moment, these are the kinds of statements he is objecting to. You weren't there in the studio in 1990 and 1991, so you don't know how often he was there. The only people who do are in or closely related to the band at the time, and they sure as heck have no obligation to tell anyone about any specifics, as it's none of anyone's business unless they want it to be. During the filming of the I'm Going Slightly Mad video, there was a bed backstage for Freddie to rest on between takes, as he had such little energy. If anything, this should suggest that he was not consistently busy in the studio in the last year of his life. |
Yara 19.10.2009 13:35 |
Sir GH wrote:Sebastian wrote: During Miracle and Innuendo, he spent MORE time in the studio as it's physically easier and less demanding to sit at a console and produce, than the whole touring, giving interviews, playing concerts that Maylor were doing.That is indeed a logical conclusion to make, but it is not unequivocal proof of the proposition that "Fred only spent less time in the studio at the end," as you are stating it to be. If I may speak for mooghead for a brief moment, these are the kinds of statements he is objecting to. You weren't there in the studio in 1990 and 1991, so you don't know how often he was there. The only people who do are in or closely related to the band at the time, and they sure as heck have no obligation to tell anyone about any specifics, as it's none of anyone's business unless they want it to be. During the filming of the I'm Going Slightly Mad video, there was a bed backstage for Freddie to rest on between takes, as he had such little energy. If anything, this should suggest that he was not consistently busy in the studio in the last year of his life. Another good thread aborted. [rolls eyes] No one here was there. If that's the only criterion for trying to make sense of Queen's history, then it's better to shut down the forum. I'd rather read logical, informed conclusions than illogical ones. It's enough that Sebastian's posts are helpful and thought provoking - much more so than anyone else's here lately. Of course it's a matter of perception and personal opinion. And it is so even for the people who were actually there. Each one of them has his own perception of things and none of them holds the absolute pristine unassailable truth. The user is not saying otherwise. And he'd sound absolutely annoying if he started off every single sentence with "in my most humble opinion...". For anyone with a little bit of maturity, for Christ sake, it's obvious that he's stating his opinions, as everybody else does. This is getting destructive and alienating one of Queenzone's most thoughtful posters. Not even the best researches are about spouting out "facts". It's always a matter of doing the best use of whatever evidence one may have at hand and, of course, resorting to reason and logic to put the pieces together. If he's guilty of stating his logical conclusions based on the vast amount of things he read, then I'd like all users to be found guilty of the same crime. The criminal forum would be undoubtedly a better one. |
The Real Wizard 19.10.2009 14:03 |
Yara wrote: No one here was there. If that's the only criterion for trying to make sense of Queen's history, then it's better to shut down the forum. I wouldn't go that far. No doubt Sebastian is an expert on Queen's music in more ways than one, but if people look up to you as some kind of expert, you should be certain that opinions are not stated as facts. There are linguistic ways to distinguish between the two, without having to resort to the IMHO route. |
Angeline 20.10.2009 05:26 |
Yara wrote:Sir GH wrote:Another good thread aborted. [rolls eyes] No one here was there. If that's the only criterion for trying to make sense of Queen's history, then it's better to shut down the forum. I'd rather read logical, informed conclusions than illogical ones. It's enough that Sebastian's posts are helpful and thought provoking - much more so than anyone else's here lately. Of course it's a matter of perception and personal opinion. And it is so even for the people who were actually there. Each one of them has his own perception of things and none of them holds the absolute pristine unassailable truth. The user is not saying otherwise. And he'd sound absolutely annoying if he started off every single sentence with "in my most humble opinion...". For anyone with a little bit of maturity, for Christ sake, it's obvious that he's stating his opinions, as everybody else does. This is getting destructive and alienating one of Queenzone's most thoughtful posters. Not even the best researches are about spouting out "facts". It's always a matter of doing the best use of whatever evidence one may have at hand and, of course, resorting to reason and logic to put the pieces together. If he's guilty of stating his logical conclusions based on the vast amount of things he read, then I'd like all users to be found guilty of the same crime. The criminal forum would be undoubtedly a better one.Sebastian wrote: During Miracle and Innuendo, he spent MORE time in the studio as it's physically easier and less demanding to sit at a console and produce, than the whole touring, giving interviews, playing concerts that Maylor were doing.That is indeed a logical conclusion to make, but it is not unequivocal proof of the proposition that "Fred only spent less time in the studio at the end," as you are stating it to be. If I may speak for mooghead for a brief moment, these are the kinds of statements he is objecting to. You weren't there in the studio in 1990 and 1991, so you don't know how often he was there. The only people who do are in or closely related to the band at the time, and they sure as heck have no obligation to tell anyone about any specifics, as it's none of anyone's business unless they want it to be. During the filming of the I'm Going Slightly Mad video, there was a bed backstage for Freddie to rest on between takes, as he had such little energy. If anything, this should suggest that he was not consistently busy in the studio in the last year of his life. here, here! |
Sebastian 20.10.2009 09:42 |
Exactly: even people who were there can (and often) disagree in their views. Typical Rashomon effect. For instance: let's say Fred was wondering about possible ways to finish Friends Will Be Friends, and he offered three of them, of which Dr May suggested the one about reversing the order ('right 'til the end friends will be friends). Four people witness the moment, or learn about it: one thinks Fred already knew what to do and was just confirming that was the best choice; another one sees it as a collaborative moment between both; another one sees it as 'Fred had no fucking idea, and without Brian's genius advice he'd be nothing'; another one simply assumes the lyric was co-writen (which is tad different to the second option). All of them could be right, all of them could be wrong. Mooghead criticised the fact that (according to him/her, and that's speculation as well - so s/he should have started it with 'in my opinion...') my only source' what I hear. Dear Lord... I deserve the death penalty for having my HEARING sense as a source for MUSIC research!!!!! Last time I tried to smell whether Roger hits an A or an Ab on '39 I failed... but I suppose that's just me... The thing's simple: those who don't like my research can refrain from visiting my website. And by the way, there are several sources (both witnesses and implied conclusions) about Fred spending his last years completely devoted to his work, as opposed to just going in the studio to sing and then leaving the dirty work to the others (and BTW the others aren't just Brian May). |
4 x Vision 20.10.2009 14:43 |
I can agree with both Yara and SirGH here. I must admit, I have MORE recently added "IMO" as much as I can for fear of being held to ransom for claiming I am giving a factual statement. I come here to get my thoughts/questions out of my head and hopefully start some good threads were more experienced members like SEB, SirGH, PD, JS etc can (if they'd like) take part. Then I try my best to keep up lol. You're right Yara, there is a fine line between opinion and fact and which you are trying to put over in a TEXT based forum. But SIrGH is also right. Seb has a habit of jumping on opinions which don't relate to his own train of thought... and more often than not, with the research he has put in over time, and with much better "Queen filling" he can add to his answers will always look like his opinions be more correct than less experienced members... Doesn't make everything he says fact I know, but often it does look that way. IMO (lol) A few times I have made observations or have asked questions only to have been taken exactly the wrong way, as if I'd been trying to mislead. I am quite careful with my answers/questions/topics so that I never portray my opinion as fact. It annoys me sometimes that I have to go to great lengths and so do others, when they've simply been taken out of context. This is in no way offered as a criticism of you Seb and i hope you don't see it as such. I've personally told you how thankful i am that you participate in my threads. I only wish more like minded folk would do the same, as lately you are the only "expert" (i know you don't claim to be, but in terms of QZ) who visibly gets involved. Sadly, i feel some of these discussions are not as interesting to the older members any more which is a MASSIVE SHAME. |
4 x Vision 20.10.2009 14:45 |
Also... YARA, where have you been ? lol |
Sebastian 20.10.2009 16:18 |
There's a lot of interesting stuff in what you wrote, and I'll try to reflect every point as much as I can: * I agree with Yara that if we were to follow Mooghead's rules, we should shut the forum and all Queen websites, Actually, we should shut Bri's Soapbox too since he's also stated wrong things now and then. * All in all, there are two big and strong sub-groups IMO: those who think Queen = Freddie, and those who think Queen = Brian. And both are way off. * I do acknowledge that I'm very firm (which is NOT the same as stubborn) about my conclusions, simply because I tend to very very thorough when it comes to research of any kind (my BD website, while far from being perfect, is a proof of that), so it's not about thinking Plant sang higher than Taylor just because it 'seemed so' to me, but being (within the obvious limitations we all have) certain that Taylor sang higher than Plant because their top notes were mathematically compared. (For the record, I don't fucking know about Plant's range, it was only a hypothetical example). That's VERY different from jumping to other people's throats if they disagree. But then again, there ARE topics with B/W answers, and if I happen to know any of them, I've got no problem in correcting mistakes when they appear. For instance, there's NO way to establish whether Show Must Go On's a better song than I Want It All or viceversa. So, you can have people saying Show's better, others saying IWIA's better, and they're both 'right'. But, other things can be measured: which one's longer, which one was written/recorded first, which one has higher/lower notes, which one has faster guitar scales/licks, which one has more chords, etc... * With that in mind, if anybody says 'I like My Fairy King more than Bo Rhap', that's their opinion and I respect it (regardless of whether I agree or not, and in this case I don't). But if anybody says 'My Fairy King has higher notes than Bo Rhap' that can be measured, and it doesn't, and I know that; hence, I 'jump in' and correct. Like it? Fine. Dislike it? Fine - I haven't got to ask for permisson anyway. Does it mean I think of myself as a god, a walking encyclopaedia of music or a person whose opinion's worth more than anybody else's? No, of course not - and if anybody sees it as that, it's their problem, not mine. It simply means that some stuff IS black or white. For instance, to be a bit BTT, late era Q was NOT mainly Brian (just like it was NOT mainly Freddie, NOT mainly Roger and NOT mainly John). * It's been commented that 'what (I) know is what (I) hear' as if it were a bad thing. Again, the #1 source you can have for music is HEARING. How often do you see a serious musical research based on the way the notes, chords or modulations SMELL? But it's indeed an important point: I haven't got any special source of info, I'm using the same records, interviews and liner notes we've all got access to, and I haven't got any extra ear or CSI type of tool to separate sounds with perfect quality (even for background noises in a phone call - what's the deal with that?). Besides the fact I'm a professional musician (as many people here, so it's not something rare or special here) and as such can understand and organise certain things quite well without feeling I'm speaking a foreign language, my only vice for being a so-called 'expert' here by many (and an idiot by many, as well) is the fact I'm curious enough to research. And that's how the site started: I read 'Was It All Worth It was written by May', and no further explanation was given besides the fact it'd got heavy guitars and hence it HAD TO be Brian's (ridiculous argument). So, I simply didn't buy it. After some research I confirmed what I'd thought: both May and the producer had commented it's (chiefly) Freddie's. When I was prepared enough to make a song analysis, I again found many Mercury-esque details that agreed with what had been concluded from a journalistic perspective. So... a myth fell down, and I started to compile a new list. I published it on QMS, loads and loads thought I was merely an idiot who was against what EVERYBODY knew... but eventually some started to see it made sense, and I slowly gained respect (curiously, loads of visits to my website come from people who hate me). Same for Bo Rhap: I read '180 voices', and the only difference is that I didn't buy it. * Does it mean I'm Prometheus giving fire to people who didn't know what it was? No, of course not. But I did do (with all the mistakes and errors it contains) a thoughtful research and dared 'uncover' several aspects. For that I am proud and I can say I've done a good job in and for the Queen community. Does it mean I deserve a medal, a trophy, a thousand quid and a box of Fred's ashes?No. But I am very proud when I read things quoted or paraphrased (with or without permisson, with or without credit, directly or indirectly, depending on the case) from my web and my research both in sites (QueenConcerts, QueenPedia, QueenSongs, UltimateQueen, Wikipedia), books and even the press occasionally. |
Cwazy little thing 20.10.2009 18:20 |
Sebastian wrote: During a Sunset Strip interview made to Maylor in 1991, Brian commented that he wasn't even in the room when Fred wrote it (the riff). He then changed the key and some of the notes to make it playable on guitar, and later on John would reconstruct the track, changing the order and (whatever he meant by) 'everything'. While that's as much circumstantial evidence as the BV's and the 54-sec demo (and the fact it's heavy says nothing... remember Ogre Battle, Princes of the Universe, Let Me Entertain You or even Was It All Worth It?), it makes sense considering the song, arrangement aside, does fit Fred's style a lot more than Brian's if you look through it musically. Of course, none of that gives us any account on the melody, the lyrics and other details. We do know, of course, that Brian was heavily involved with it, but that can also be said about Freddie and Radio Ga Ga and the song is still Roger's, isn't it? Or George Martin and Yesterday, etc. What can be inferred from both interviews and song analysis is that The Hitman's got a very mixed approach, with all sans Roger having a lot to do with it at some point (unless, hypothetically, Roger contributed to the lyrics rather strongly, there's nothing to confirm or deny that), which still works for the point I'm making (i.e. late era Q was NOT mainly Brian). The topic's far from being finished or cleared, and I hope one year from now we can look back and think 'how little we knew about it, and how much there's still to research on'... that's the whole point of these threads IMO. Ah, excellent - I assumed you'd have a good source for your assertion, and true enough, there it is (and yes, my mind immediately went to tracks like Ogre Battle when I first heard it suggested it was a Fred originated track). I have no doubt Queen were as collaborative as ever towards the end - demonstrated by their willingness to share writing credits if nothing else. And incidently, I can smell an Ab a country mile away. hehe :D GOOD discussion, and I am, as ever, delighted to be educated a bit. |
4 x Vision 21.10.2009 10:19 |
Sebastian wrote: Nicely structured response and makes a lot of sense. What I will say is, you mention you use your "ear" just like everyone else, so have no advantage, but you go on to mention you have professional musical training (which one would have guessed by some/most of your answers). I personally think this does give you a little benefit over the lay Queen fan (to our benefit may i add, that you can give such detailed info... and then Yara can explain it all for us who don't get it lol). I only made the previous statement because I think you sometimes misread the initial poster or replier (just like lots of us do in all fairness). You still seem to think that I set out with this topic i.e Was late era Q mainly Bri? to give my opinion that HE WAS more Queen... when i've really just had a thought from another thread and then asked the question, let folk give their answers, so as i can then base my personal conclusion... in this case, I AGREE, HE WASN'T. You have enlightened me into the amount that Freddie still contributed, even as he got sicker. Funnily enough, i used to be one of those Freddie=Queen fans, and only in last few years as I got older (and wiser lol) I saw past my bias and gave the others their due, especially Brian. As mentioned above though, there is no real answer. We'll never know who made the most contribution over time in the studio... as we weren't there!!! Chances are John was the creative one who changed all their material to give it the "Deacon sound" which we now know as the "Queen sound" he he. Back to topic : Thanks for all your answers and some fun discussion, my own conclusion as mentioned is that they were all still equal (last 3 albums Miracle, Inn, MIH) and nobody tried to "take over" in the studio to influence the end product. Although it may seem he had more creative influence over MIH, that being true if he restarted the work undertook by John and Roger. (I'd love to have the demos from the MIH sessions more than any other album... also a good 5.1 of any of the Heaven For Everyone versions so as i can listen to Freddie's middle harmonies which are stunning). |
4 x Vision 21.10.2009 10:45 |
To add... I manage bars and nightclubs in Scotland. Over the years i've worked in every part of the hospitality industry. I've worked in some fantastic management teams over the years and in turn, developed my own abilities through learning the best (in what I see) in my colleagues. The Van Basten 9 (lol) I am today, is very different from the Van Basten 9 of 5 years ago. I can see in myself some great changes in the way I operate and manage people/tasks etc. You may ask...WTF? But... Would the Queen members have retained their own unique style THROUGHOUT their Queen career (up to 1991)??? Or would they have let themselves learn from the other members in the group and in turn alter their style? I think the obvious answer is "yes"... but there were big arguments in the studios, they did have rows and conflicting views on how the material should ultimately sound... so much so that they let the song's creator have final say on it's end product? Would their "arrogance" (remember they are rock artists... and have said they were arrogant) have meant that they kept their individualism in the studio or could they have majorly altered the way they work to the point that they may even mimic the style/thinking of one of the others... thus making a discussion such as we're having all the more difficult? Especially when discussing or dissecting an individual song or era!!! e.g 1 : I would have put money on the Hitman being Brian's song... both in writing and in the end product... heavy, strong guitars.. kinda like Headlong and I Want It All. I was shocked that it was Freddie's... but it could make sense that he'd written it in a Brian-esque way. This may suggest Sebastian is right in saying they were all 4 equal members, but there is still an argument against this conclusion... mainly down to their personalities and to the much documented rows they had in the studio, resulting in them putting Queen down as opposed to individual song writing credits from Miracle onwards to avoid them arguing further. e.g 2 : Of all the solo projects.... Freddie sounded like Freddie. Roger and The Cross, nothing like Queen in the slightest. John's Biggles thing i've never heard... Brian solo works sound like Queen albums (this all being what I hear, not on fact). With this in mind, could this alter the topic's argument in any way???? Even slightly lol |
Sebastian 21.10.2009 13:15 |
Brian sounded like Queen because he wanted to, not because he was Queen. It's the same I've always said: though I haven't listened to TCR, I suppose there's not a track similar to The Prophet's Song. Is that incontestable proof that, regardless of the credits, it must have been written by either Freddie or John? Of course not, it simply proves the 2008 May's different from the 1975 one (not necessarily better or worse). Same case here: 'Mr Bad Guy' was issued in an era during which Fred was immersed in minimalistic and disco-oriented music (it was done between the two only Queen albums I hate BTW), which is why there are no Bo Rhap's, Master-Stroke's or Love of My Life's there. It's also a matter of approach: while Freddie and Roger tended to use their off-Queen stints to try very different ideas, Brian was more cautious and stayed playing in the same field, with the only difference that Cozy & Neil gave the sound a heavier feel, and the doctor sang himself (very beautifully indeed). That can also be found in his songwriting: both his ballads and his heavy tracks remained in a more or less similar pattern (i.e. I Want It All was, keyboards-aside, as classic Queen as it could get). That's not what Roger did, for instance (compare Modern Times Rock 'n' Roll with Days of Our Lives), and neither thing's 'better' or 'worse', but it's an important difference to keep in mind. The Hitman's a recurring problem for this research: as a matter of fact, it's a mistake to think it's a May track, but it's also a mistake thinking it's solely a Mercury one. Remember Ga Ga or Magic... same case here. |
August R. 26.10.2009 17:54 |
Here's a thought concerning the "mystery" of Brian's demo of Hitman. (in case it hasn't been solved already) If it's true that Brian "changed some of the notes of Freddie's original riff and also changed the key" the the logical questions about the demo are: 1) Is it in the same key as the final recorded version of the song, and, 2) is the riff identical to the final version. If the answer to these questions is "yes" then we can safely assume that Brian made this demo after he had changed Freddie's original idea. Brian's demo COULD in fact be his way of saying to Freddie (and others): Look, I changed your song a bit and this is my vision of how it should go. Now, I leave it to your ears to decide if the demo has Freddie's original idea or Brian's ideas. |
mike hunt 27.10.2009 01:10 |
Van Basten 9 wrote: To add... I manage bars and nightclubs in Scotland. Over the years i've worked in every part of the hospitality industry. I've worked in some fantastic management teams over the years and in turn, developed my own abilities through learning the best (in what I see) in my colleagues. The Van Basten 9 (lol) I am today, is very different from the Van Basten 9 of 5 years ago. I can see in myself some great changes in the way I operate and manage people/tasks etc. You may ask...WTF? But... Would the Queen members have retained their own unique style THROUGHOUT their Queen career (up to 1991)??? Or would they have let themselves learn from the other members in the group and in turn alter their style? I think the obvious answer is "yes"... but there were big arguments in the studios, they did have rows and conflicting views on how the material should ultimately sound... so much so that they let the song's creator have final say on it's end product? Would their "arrogance" (remember they are rock artists... and have said they were arrogant) have meant that they kept their individualism in the studio or could they have majorly altered the way they work to the point that they may even mimic the style/thinking of one of the others... thus making a discussion such as we're having all the more difficult? Especially when discussing or dissecting an individual song or era!!! e.g 1 : I would have put money on the Hitman being Brian's song... both in writing and in the end product... heavy, strong guitars.. kinda like Headlong and I Want It All. I was shocked that it was Freddie's... but it could make sense that he'd written it in a Brian-esque way. This may suggest Sebastian is right in saying they were all 4 equal members, but there is still an argument against this conclusion... mainly down to their personalities and to the much documented rows they had in the studio, resulting in them putting Queen down as opposed to individual song writing credits from Miracle onwards to avoid them arguing further. e.g 2 : Of all the solo projects.... Freddie sounded like Freddie. Roger and The Cross, nothing like Queen in the slightest. John's Biggles thing i've never heard... Brian solo works sound like Queen albums (this all being what I hear, not on fact). With this in mind, could this alter the topic's argument in any way???? Even slightly lol That's the reason I don't like brians solo stuff, it's that it sounds like queen. Too me a solo album supposed to be different, like roger or freddie's stuff. I respect roger for trying new things, while brian did the same shit over and over. |